Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cloudflare Workers vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Workers
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
21st
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Cloudflare Workers is 0.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.2%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot5.2%
Cloudflare Workers0.5%
Other94.3%
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

KA
Fractional CTO at Tassei Tech
Our application responds faster and uses global data effectively
The most valuable feature of Cloudflare Workers is that the data is on the edge. Since the data is on the edge, it makes the application more responsive worldwide, thus lowering the loading time and increasing user engagement. The scalability of Cloudflare Workers is also impressive, as it can handle spikes of traffic with ease. Cloudflare Workers also contributes to the application being faster and geographically distributed.
TusharShankar - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at Synechron
AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages
Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, Cloudflare Workers is a very good solution."
"The most valuable feature of Cloudflare Workers is that the data is on the edge."
"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."
"The platform's most valuable feature is detecting and suggesting variables based on the existing file context."
"GitHub CoPilot is easy to set up as it only requires enabling certain settings."
"In terms of understanding user queries and providing code that aligns with my expectations, there is room for improvement."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"Things which were taking like two days are now finished within half an hour."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
 

Cons

"In general, the security of the product could be improved with minimal latency due to its many points of presence."
"Monitoring needs improvement. It's a bit difficult to understand how many failures occur and manage logging effectively."
"The technology offered by the product in the retail industry and banking processes has certain shortcomings, making them areas that can be improved."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"The limitation is based on the training dataset and the number of repositories."
"They could enhance the product's accuracy of suggestions, especially when dealing with non-standard or legacy code."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."
"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Workers?
Pricing is fair considering the features offered. Our costs vary based on load, with expenses around €100 per month for CORS and approximately €600 per month for using Workers to have data on the e...
What needs improvement with Cloudflare Workers?
Monitoring needs improvement. It's a bit difficult to understand how many failures occur and manage logging effectively.
What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Workers?
We use Cloudflare Workers ( /products/cloudflare-workers-reviews ) mainly to avoid Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) issues and as a reverse proxy. It has also been beneficial in speeding up our...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I am not fully aware of the pricing details as my company manages it, but I recall it was not inexpensive.
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code.
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare Workers vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.