Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cloudflare Workers vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Workers
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
24th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Cloudflare Workers is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 6.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

KA
Our application responds faster and uses global data effectively
The most valuable feature of Cloudflare Workers is that the data is on the edge. Since the data is on the edge, it makes the application more responsive worldwide, thus lowering the loading time and increasing user engagement. The scalability of Cloudflare Workers is also impressive, as it can handle spikes of traffic with ease. Cloudflare Workers also contributes to the application being faster and geographically distributed.
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, Cloudflare Workers is a very good solution."
"The most valuable feature of Cloudflare Workers is that the data is on the edge."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"It enhances efficiency and productivity in development."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"The solution increases coding efficiency."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."
"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."
"The document generation features are valuable."
 

Cons

"In general, the security of the product could be improved with minimal latency due to its many points of presence."
"Monitoring needs improvement. It's a bit difficult to understand how many failures occur and manage logging effectively."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."
"There are no extensions provided by the product for Eclipse."
"Sometimes it requires multiple iterations to get the code I need, like for creating a login page with specific buttons and logic."
"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."
"I don't have enough experience to share this kind of feedback."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."
"The solution is costly."
"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."
"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."
"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Workers?
Pricing is fair considering the features offered. Our costs vary based on load, with expenses around €100 per month for CORS and approximately €600 per month for using Workers to have data on the e...
What needs improvement with Cloudflare Workers?
Monitoring needs improvement. It's a bit difficult to understand how many failures occur and manage logging effectively.
What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Workers?
We use Cloudflare Workers ( /products/cloudflare-workers-reviews ) mainly to avoid Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) issues and as a reverse proxy. It has also been beneficial in speeding up our...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare Workers vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.