CloudCheckr vs OpenNebula comparison

Read 15 OpenNebula reviews

3,291 Views
3,126 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudCheckr and OpenNebula compete in the cloud management domain, each excelling in distinct areas. Based on feature diversity and application breadth, OpenNebula appears to have the upper hand, favored for its advanced capabilities.

Features: CloudCheckr provides comprehensive financial management, robust cost optimization tools, and detailed billing reports. It is also known for its simplicity and excellent multi-cloud integration. OpenNebula stands out with versatile infrastructure management, adaptable virtualization solutions, and powerful orchestration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CloudCheckr could improve its scalability for larger enterprises, offer more customization in reporting, and enhance its dashboard analytics. OpenNebula might benefit from simplifying its initial setup, broadening third-party integrations, and streamlining its customization options for broader appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudCheckr is praised for straightforward deployment and strong customer service, simplifying new implementations. OpenNebula, although presenting a more intricate setup due to extensive customization options, offers efficient support channels to facilitate deployment for adaptable environments.

Pricing and ROI: CloudCheckr's competitive pricing and rapid ROI due to cost-saving features attract budget-conscious users. OpenNebula, requiring a higher initial investment, offers substantial ROI over time through enhanced efficiency and scalability. Its extensive capabilities deliver superior long-term value compared to CloudCheckr's immediate cost benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudCheckr vs. OpenNebula Report (Updated: June 2026).

CloudCheckr vs. OpenNebula

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,917 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (14th), Managed Cloud Services (6th), AI Observability (26th)

OpenNebula

Ranking in Cloud Management

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 2.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenNebula is 1.7%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenNebula	1.7%
CloudCheckr	2.3%
Other	96.0%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work

The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.

Read full review

FOURES Jean-Philippe

Products Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Reliable, simple to manage, and offers great technical support

The support of VXLAN fits with our network management. Thanks to this we can propose mixed solutions using virtual resources on OpenNebula and bare metal servers hosted in our facilities linked to each other on the sale network. This use case is very useful when some applications need bare metal power (Kubernetes workers, huge databases, AI models computations, et cetera). The cluster management is very useful for splitting our different clusters (mutual vs dedicated). We can manage deployments and capacity planning without pain. The API is also really simple and it helped us to develop the Terraform provider to manage OpenNebula like any other cloud infrastructure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production."

"Our clients use this to financially optimize their cloud platform, and based on their utilization it helps to decide whether their current platform needs to be optimized and what the ideal form is."

"CloudCheckr is filled with useful features, that help us learn and to deliver the best recommendations on the data we have."

"If you are on AWS, you don't need to even think about it, just go ahead with using the solution because there's no better tool in that segment than CloudCheckr CMx High Security."

"CloudCheckr has positively impacted our organization as we've cut AWS spend by around 25% over two years."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More CloudCheckr pros

"I also like the ability to build custom functions. I can define a function where I have two types of views and configure the dependencies. The virtual data centers concept allows me to define users. If a user wants to join certain kinds of machines, the host and the other user won't see them. It gives me the flexibility to define multiple views and data centers in one place."

"It's easy to integrate OpenNebula with our IT systems."

"For the entire data center, as a private cloud, I believe that user management, expert management, and the virtual data center is completely magic for the users."

"OpenNebula freed my customer from doing the maintenance operations of the servers because now that can be done by his clients."

"The live migration feature has been great and is something we use very often."

"With a single click, we could set things up and initiate them."

"It has enabled us to decrease the optics by around 55 to 60%."

"The solution provides templates for configurations that can easily be exchanged to VMs."

More OpenNebula pros

Cons

"CloudCheckr can be very slow sometimes."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"Some aspects could be made more customizable, such as the dashboard and UI."

"CloudCheckr could enhance its Azure support, as it honestly feels an afterthought."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

More CloudCheckr cons

"It should have a simple REST API like most other tools. It's the industry standard format. An XML-RPC API gives you an XML document that you have to convert and then do something with that. REST API endpoint provides outputs in a JSON document. I would also like to see support for user data or heat templates, which OpenStack offers, but OpenNebula doesn't have this yet."

"Template management also needs improvement in OpenNebula because it's inferior right now."

"Hosting platforms are limited so the deployment process needs improvement."

"As with all enterprise software licensing, the pricing is not intuitive and must be negotiated; grandfathered contracts are better than anything offered today."

"The front-facing API can be improved to support lots of requests when the platform is huge with lots of virtual resources."

"The UI, monitoring, and alerting could benefit from further improvements."

"There are small things that are hard. For example, making sure that it is going to be installable on public clouds."

"Most of the competitors are offering some sort of billing software to transform their installation to work as a small-sized public cloud, but those offerings from OpenNebula are still missing."

More OpenNebula cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"VRA is very expensive but OpenNebula is free."

"The licensing for OpenNebula used to be free, but now it's no longer free. A customer contacted me asking to move to another provider because of the changes in the licensing terms for OpenNebula. I have no information on how much the OpenNebula license is because the customer pays for it, and I only do the integration."

"We use the Community Edition, rather than the Enterprise Edition."

"OpenNebuoa has recently come up with a new subscription model that is economical and a lot of new customers are choosing this as it is an easy subscription model."

"OpenNebula gives good value for money."

"The solution is open source so is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing reflects that it uses custom pricing based on your cloud spend, which is pretty standard for this category. I won't pretend it's cheap, but we'...

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

CloudCheckr could enhance its Azure support, as it honestly feels an afterthought. We have some workloads on Azure and the experience compared to AWS is noticeably worse. Additionally, there's a lo...

What is your primary use case for CloudCheckr ?

A quick, specific example of how I use CloudCheckr in my workflow is that first thing every morning, I check the cost anomaly alerts. CloudCheckr flags anything that looks out of the ordinary overn...

What needs improvement with OpenNebula?

The web interface could be better. It's not very difficult to use, but there's room for enhancement. Another area for improvement is the integration with hardware to manage the lower layer of the n...

What is your primary use case for OpenNebula?

Previously, we were using VMware, but recently, we've started using OpenNebula for cloud management. As a big cloud provider, it helps give customers increased control over their clusters. We use L...

What advice do you have for others considering OpenNebula?

I recommend it, especially if you need a management interface for a small to medium private cloud. I would rate OpenNebula an eight out of ten.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudCheckr

Comparisons

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 3% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

CloudStack vs OpenNebula

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenNebula

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs OpenNebula

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs OpenNebula

Compared 5% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs OpenNebula

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenNebula Competitors

Product Reports

Download CloudCheckr product report

CloudCheckr

June 2026

Download OpenNebula product report

May 2026

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

No data available

Overview

CloudCheckr offers a cohesive platform for managing cloud infrastructures with a focus on cost visibility, security, and compliance. Designed for multi-cloud environments, it provides insights and optimizations to enhance decision-making and resource efficiency.

CloudCheckr delivers thorough cloud management with features like cost analysis, security and compliance checks, and automated optimization suggestions. Its intuitive interface allows for easy deployment, supporting cost-saving measures. Users often find its cost visibility, multi-cloud integration capabilities, and granular reporting particularly beneficial. However, improvements can be made in areas such as Azure and Google Cloud integration, reporting capabilities, pricing model clarity, and UI complexity reduction.

What are CloudCheckr's key features?

Intuitive Interface: Easy navigation and deployment enhance user interaction.
Cost Visibility: Offers in-depth financial analysis and efficiency insights.
Granular Reporting: Customizable reports that provide detailed insights.
Multi-Cloud Integration: Supports various cloud platforms efficiently.
Actionable Insights: Auto-generated optimizations help reduce expenses.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost Reduction: Identifies idle resources and optimizes usage.
Resource Management: Facilitates effective allocation and governance.
Improved Security: Runs compliance checks and addresses vulnerabilities.
Managed Services: Simplifies billing and supports multi-tenant environments.

Industries using CloudCheckr benefit from enhanced cloud financial optimization and security monitoring. Managed service providers find it crucial for customer billing, while organizations leverage its multi-cloud support for maintaining compliance and governing usage. Specifically useful in sectors like finance and technology, it aids in data analysis and cost-saving strategies.

Spot - A Flexera company

OpenNebula offers scalability, ease of deployment, and integration capabilities that enhance cloud management for enterprises. It supports both virtual and bare metal resources, providing a versatile cloud management experience.

OpenNebula provides a robust platform for building, managing, and automating private and public clouds. Its compatibility with platforms like VMware, KVM, and containers makes it ideal for businesses hosting virtual private clouds and deploying Kubernetes clusters. OpenNebula's API and SDK facilitate automation and integration, allowing organizations to connect with IT systems effectively. Despite its strengths, improvements in object storage, REST API integration, and UI enhancements are needed. The documentation can be disorganized, and users encounter challenges with upgrades and community support.

What are key OpenNebula features?

Scalability: Easily manage resources for growing cloud environments.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies cloud management tasks.
Integration: Connects seamlessly with IT systems using robust API and SDK.
Hypervisor Support: Works with multiple hypervisors and container platforms.

What benefits do users find in OpenNebula?

Efficiency: Streamlines cloud operations, reducing management complexities.
Versatility: Offers support for both virtual and bare metal resources.
Community and Documentation: Though needing improvement, provides valuable resources for users.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lightweight nature minimizes resource expenditure.

OpenNebula implementation spans industries where cloud automation and management are critical. Companies utilize OpenNebula for deploying private clouds and managing infrastructure. Its support for Kubernetes clusters is beneficial in tech-driven sectors, highlighting OpenNebula's adaptability to different operational needs.

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Akamai, BBC, Fermilab, Terradue, Surf Sara, Produban, Netways, ESA, China Mobile, BlackBerry, Deloitte, Fuze, Telefonica, Trivago, Nokia, Encore Tech, Beeks.