No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points vs Huawei Wireless comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Wireless 9100 Access ...
Ranking in Wireless LAN
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Huawei Wireless
Ranking in Wireless LAN
12th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Bharath _Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at Velocis Systems
Wireless has delivered advanced analytics and remote troubleshooting for diverse use cases
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is valuable because of Cisco's Wi-Fi integration with Cisco Spaces, previously called DNA Spaces. When you bundle Cisco AP with Cisco Spaces, the complete wireless story comes into the picture. The first major advantage is the hardware, the chipset, the processor, and the IOS. There is unified licensing and unified iOS, and once you have DNA advantage, you can get a separate AVIX and the Wi-Fi 6 or 6E dashboard in DNAC. These advantages provide basic throughput support, OFDMA, multi-MIMO architecture, and the latest 4K QAM in Wi-Fi 7, previously 1024 QAM, and MLO in Wi-Fi 7. These functionalities exist for every OEM, but the Cisco advantage is the integration with Wi-Fi Spaces. Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points includes one AP that can operate in dual mode. You can onboard it in Meraki or Catalyst, meaning on-premises or cloud controller. Single hardware can be dual OS, either Meraki OS or Catalyst OS. For IoT and industrial wireless, Cisco has a different technology called CURV. The APs are different from the Catalyst 9000 series APs. There is a different set of series with different models working on fluid mesh architecture of Cisco CURV. Remote troubleshooting is a basic functionality of any SDN controller these days. Engineers do not need to manually log in to the end device, which could be either a switch or an AP. From DNA Center itself, you can get visibility from the assurance. You can get client 360, network 360, and application 360 where the health scores of each individual client are clearly visible in DNAC Center. The assurance data provides visibility and highlights the issues that a particular user or particular network node is facing. You can access the device without any challenge. Similar to how SD-WAN came into the picture seven to eight years ago where you could remotely log in to the WAN edge devices and troubleshoot it, the same principle is being applied in DNAC Center for the campus, whether it is switching or WAN. If the RTT latency has been met from the branch to the place where DNAC Center is deployed, you can easily access those devices without needing an engineer to visit that particular location for troubleshooting.
Shahnawaz Nusrat - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of Technical Operations at ITE
Effective and extensive campus Wi-Fi with room for better frequency management
We have deployed Huawei CCTV solutions at multiple universities in Pakistan. This includes Huawei Wireless for Smart Campus projects, where we provide blanket Wi-Fi coverage and Safe Campus projects, where we deploy security cameras and multiple devices to monitor the campus Huawei Wireless has…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In terms of pricing, Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points are quite expensive, but they are worth the investment because once acquired from Cisco, the support and service are excellent."
"The reliability of Cisco is the number one aspect I have seen, and the performance is pretty stable."
"What I appreciate about Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is the convenience to operate them and install them across locations remotely or on-premise."
"Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points' best feature is that it is a standalone device and we do not have to configure it, as it is just plug and play and once you connect the access point to the switch, it will start working and enable many users to connect through the access point."
"I assess the stability and reliability of Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points as very solid, it is tried and true, it has been tested, and we have had no problems whatsoever with that particular platform."
"Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points has positively impacted my organization, particularly in performance with throughput and the number of users connecting on a single AP initially."
"I really liked the 9162 because it has Meraki integration and is essentially plug and play; once you get it on the network, it sees Meraki Cloud, appears as a new device, and all you need to do is put in the license key to register it and you are done."
"Wi-Fi 7 and WPA3 connectivity has made a difference for my organization as it allows for better and faster connectivity."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"The solution has high performance and we are using Wi-Fi 6 that we have found to be the best coverage."
"It is easy to set up."
"The solution's most valuable feature is mobility or seamless roaming."
"The solution is very stable; there are no bugs or glitches, it works very well, it does not crash, and the performance is very good, and so far we have not received any complaints or any faulty hardware or anything."
"It provides high-speed network connections."
"Installation is easy."
"We've found the solution to be quite stable."
 

Cons

"Frankly, ease of use is one of the things that needs improvement, as the management interfaces have always been complex and not very intuitive."
"The navigation tools of the GUI could be more user-intuitive in certain areas."
"What I dislike about Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is that controlling multiple APs is not centralized."
"Cisco is always expensive. In terms of pricing, it is very tough because I have lost many RFPs because of the pricing where Ruckus is much less expensive."
"However, over time, noise distortions have reduced AP performance to about thirty percent. Before, the throughput would be eighty to ninety percent, but now some APs behave like twenty to thirty percent with services unavailable."
"I have had some issues with some of the lower-end devices where I needed to do RMAs. For some reason, the devices either had an issue with the power supply or they got bricked after a firmware update."
"Apart from that, the security measures of Cisco have not provided us with great help in reducing network vulnerabilities."
"Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points are expensive. They are definitely expensive."
"The scalability could be better."
"We are experiencing some challenges in terms of technical support; it's not readily available."
"Cloud integration needs to be improved."
"There were some issues with the network design, but that is not specifically related to the product."
"They should actually first test the equipment thoroughly and then launch it. Sometimes, things come out too soon, before they are ready."
"Technical support is not great. Whenever I open a case, I don't get any immediate support."
"The manageability of radio frequencies to avoid overlapping needs improvement."
"While I am fine with the current licensing price, I would appreciate it to be more cost-effective."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We don't have any control on the pricing. This comes from Huawei in India. Pricing-wise, Huawei is very aggressive and competitive if you compare them to competitors, like Cisco, Aruba, and Ruckus. The Indian Huawei team tells us, "Just pick up the order and design the infrastructure. If there are any pricing challenge, we'll work on that and we will try to match things 100 percent.""
"Its price is very good. This wireless system totally costs about 30,000 euros, and some of the other solutions cost about 45,000 euros. It is a difference of 15,000 euros, which is quite a lot of money."
"Huawei licenses can be for either a one-year up to a five-year period and also apply for the tiers."
"It is very cost-effective."
"I would rate them something, like, eight to nine, on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"Its price is reasonable."
"The price of Huawei Wireless is reasonable. The licenses are active, and everything is working fine as per the license agreement."
"The price is good for the solution and there is a license required."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Marketing Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Catalyst 9100 Access Points?
The navigation tools of the GUI could be more user-intuitive in certain areas. When trying to find a specific setting or option, it may not be in the most obvious place. This happened to me when we...
What is your primary use case for Catalyst 9100 Access Points?
I primarily use this solution for configuring access points through a centralized app and monitoring them. I create SSIDs, enable or disable them, and secure them as needed. When I came to this job...
What advice do you have for others considering Catalyst 9100 Access Points?
Since Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points integrates all components into one ecosystem, no handoff needs to occur, making the system more secure. Our most mission-critical items are hardwired, but we...
Which wireless solution would you choose - Huawei or D-Link?
Huawei wireless is a strong and solid product that has a lot of features - and for all that it offers, it happens to be very cost effective. As a wireless solution, it is simple and its user interf...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huawei Wireless?
For SMB customers with limited wireless users, Huawei Wireless may not be suitable due to the lack of multiple access points and the need for a centralized SSID. However, for large-capacity custome...
What needs improvement with Huawei Wireless?
The manageability of radio frequencies to avoid overlapping needs improvement. Additionally, the reporting part requires enhancement as some customers need detailed reports of each Wi-Fi point, whi...
 

Also Known As

Catalyst 9100 Access Points
Huawei WLAN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Anhui Agricultural University (AAU), China Everbright Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points vs. Huawei Wireless and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.