Cisco UCS Manager vs NetCrunch comparison

Cisco and AdRem Software are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.8, while AdRem Software is ranked #65. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

2,065 Views
1,859 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

1,233 Views
555 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetCrunch and Cisco UCS Manager are competing products in the IT infrastructure management space. Data comparisons indicate that while NetCrunch is favored for its pricing and support, Cisco UCS Manager stands out with its robust feature set, justifying its higher cost.

Features: NetCrunch offers comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, real-time alerts, and customizable dashboards, making it suitable for various IT environments. Cisco UCS Manager delivers robust server and storage management, seamless resource pooling, and advanced automation functionalities, giving it an edge in complex data center operations.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch could improve by expanding its automation capabilities, enhancing integration with third-party applications, and providing more scalability for larger environments. Cisco UCS Manager may benefit from a simplified deployment process, reducing the setup complexity, and improving user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch offers quick deployment with many pre-configured options and responsive support. Cisco UCS Manager, requiring a more intricate setup targeted at large-scale environments, provides detailed documentation and expert consulting, though its complexity can lengthen initial deployment compared to NetCrunch.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch generally presents a lower setup cost, appealing to small to medium-sized businesses seeking immediate ROI. Cisco UCS Manager, with higher initial costs, is suited for enterprises aiming for long-term ROI through comprehensive infrastructure management. The significant investment in Cisco UCS Manager is often offset by its sophisticated features and scalability, offering value to larger deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. NetCrunch

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetCrunch

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

65th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (81st), Server Monitoring (28th), Log Management (61st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.3%
NetCrunch	0.6%
Other	98.1%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rob-Croxford

Consultant at rcnss

A market leader with an enhanced user interface for seamless experience

There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing. Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones. Companies don't really understand how long it takes to set up. Also, when changes are pushed, it can take their phone line off the system for twenty minutes to half an hour. Out-of-the-box functionality is an issue, too. I know that my company is different, however, the basics are always the same. You do your tap lines, zip lines, and stuff like that, then you get your internal phone line system. That can all be automated and scripted, and it's probably part of the automation process. However, I haven't really seen it.

Read full review

it_user1038504

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For the blade architecture and ease of use, I consider Cisco UCS Manager the best option on the market at the moment."

"Ease of management is certainly the most valuable feature in this product."

"Cisco Infrastructure is one of the top vendors and no one can beat them in terms of switching and routing."

"The flexibility and the ease in which the features can be expanded are the solution's most valuable aspects."

"Cisco UCS Manager is recommended for its ease of deployment and management capabilities."

"Cisco UCS has different layers of security, and you can do multiple installations of your LIAMs on top of the server and Blade. You can install VMware, Windows Server, Hyper-V, etc."

"The interface is ergonomic and native. We can use UCS Manager to do all the configurations for the servers, including storage, networking, and all the other components we need inside the fabric. It's simple and flexible."

"The management is one of the most valuable features of this solution."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"The pricing aspect should be addressed."

"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."

"I want to be able to schedule multiple sequential updates in one go."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to their security."

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it. It's quite difficult for somebody who doesn't know the product very well. Users should be able to get proficient with it faster. There's definitely room for improvement there."

"I would like to see improved visibility into the operating system, enabling us to identify issues directly from the operating system itself."

"I would like to see Cisco UCS optionally work as a hyper-converged system because right now, it only operates as a converged system."

"For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

14%

Educational Organization

10%

Agriculture

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 64% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 16% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs NetCrunch

Compared 14% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmk vs NetCrunch

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs NetCrunch

Compared 8% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

January 2026

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download NetCrunch product report

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

NetCrunch is an all-in-one network monitoring platform designed for hybrid IT environments, offering comprehensive agentless monitoring of thousands of devices across different technologies and platforms.

NetCrunch streamlines network management with automated discovery, configuration, and monitoring through rule-defined policies. It covers monitoring across various environments, providing real-time dashboards, dynamic views, and topology maps. With its versatile features, it supports diverse IT ecosystems efficiently. It offers a node-based license model that enables scalable deployment on-prem, self-hosted in the cloud, or in hybrid settings.

What are NetCrunch's most important features?

Agentless Monitoring: Supports devices using SNMP, server metrics, virtualization, cloud platforms, and traffic flows.
Automated Discovery: Facilitates network configuration and monitoring via 670+ monitoring packs and sensors.
Advanced Alerting: Filters, delays, and correlates alerts to minimize false positives with configurable escalation paths.
Real-time Dashboards: Provides dynamic views and automatic topology maps reflecting device status and relationships.
Action Scripts: Offers 40+ actions like script execution and device reboot to manage network incidents.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from NetCrunch?

Scalability: Simplifies expansion with a node-based licensing model adapting to network growth.
Flexibility: Supports on-prem, cloud, or hybrid models for versatile deployment options.
Efficiency: Automates routine tasks reducing manual intervention and potential errors.
Reliability: Enhances monitoring accuracy with real-time updates and minimized false alerts.
Integration Capability: Works with email, SMS, and service integrations for streamlined communication.

NetCrunch is implemented across industries like healthcare and finance, ensuring comprehensive monitoring solutions that accommodate specific protocol and compliance requirements. It's tailored for seamless integration into various IT architectures optimizing monitoring capabilities tailored to industry standards.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. NetCrunch

January 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.