Cisco UCS Director vs Snyk comparison

Cisco and Snyk are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while Snyk is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.7. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Snyk’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 14 Cisco UCS Director reviews

575 Views
314 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Snyk

Read 47 Snyk reviews

220 Views
91 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Snyk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

Cisco UCS Director and Snyk complement each other in the realm of IT solutions but address different aspects. While UCS Director primarily manages data centers, Snyk focuses on security and vulnerability management. Snyk has stronger security features due to its dedicated focus on vulnerability management.

Features: Cisco UCS Director offers comprehensive automation, resource management, and workflow orchestration across data center operations. It supports multi-cloud management and centralized control of infrastructure. Snyk specializes in identifying vulnerabilities with accurate databases, providing developer-friendly integrations, and offering actionable advice for security issues.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS Director could enhance support for non-Cisco environments and streamline its user interface for easier navigation. Its documentation could be more exhaustive. Snyk could benefit from expanding its integration library, refining the UI for better usability, and providing more detailed guidance for vulnerability remediation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Director has an extensive deployment model suiting large enterprises but involves a complex setup. Its customer service is robust, catered for large-scale operations. Snyk offers easy integration with development pipelines, focusing on efficient security deployments, and has responsive support tailored for security issues.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Director requires a substantial initial investment due to its broad scope but justifies costs with improved resource utilization and operational efficiency. Snyk provides a cost-effective setup with attractive ROI by reducing security breaches and integrating seamlessly into development processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Cloud Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Container Security (5th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Sunny Nair

Solution Architect and Senior Consultant at Keysight Technologies

Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement

Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems. I feel that more development or a more integrated road map should be set up so that it becomes a common platform for any infrastructure. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see changes in the navigation controls of UCS Director. That would be helpful. Modifying the icons that are available for use, as well as virtualization aspects.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A product that really aids in systems management without complexity."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"Cisco's knowledge base is extensive."

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

"Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate."

"An easy and strong configuration, along with its low cost, are some of the features of the solution."

"UCS director enables us to be more productive and more agile, and also more self-sufficient because we don't have to depend on anybody else."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories, making it suitable for wide-scale deployment."

"Snyk helps me pinpoint security errors in my code."

"The CLI feature is quite useful because it gives us a lot of flexibility in what we want to do. If you use the UI, all the information is there and you can see what Snyk is showing you, but there is nothing else that you can change. However, when you use the CLI, then you can use commands and can get the output or response back from Snyk. You can also take advantage of that output in a different way. For the same reason, we have been using the CLI for the hard gate in the pipeline: Obtain a particular CDSS score for vulnerability. Based on that information, we can then decide if we want to block or allow the build. We have more flexibility if we use the CLI."

"What is valuable about Snyk is its simplicity."

"The customization is excellent."

"The dependency checks of the libraries are very valuable, but the licensing part is also very important because, with open source components, licensing can be all over the place. Our project is not an open source project, but we do use quite a lot of open source components and we want to make sure that we don't have surprises in there."

"The most valuable features are their GitLab and JIRA integrations. The GitLab integration lets us pull projects in pretty easily, so that it's pretty minimal for developers to get it set up. Using the JIRA integration, it's also pretty easy to get the information that is generated, as a result of that GitLab integration, back to our teams in a non-intrusive way and in a workflow that we are already using."

"Our overall security has improved. We are running fewer severities and vulnerabilities in our packages. We fixed a lot of the vulnerabilities that we didn't know were there."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"The product's pricing needs to improve."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable."

"The areas where this product can be improved are the integrations and the UI. These features are not as friendly compared to VMware products."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

"It is not easy to add or expand the product."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"We tried to integrate it into our software development environment but it went really badly. It took a lot of time and prevented the developers from using the IDE. Eventually, we didn't use it in the development area... I would like to see better integrations to help the developers get along better with the tool. And the plugin for the IDE is not so good. This is something we would like to have..."

"We would like to have upfront knowledge on how easy it should be to just pull in an upgraded dependency, e.g., even introduce full automation for dependencies supposed to have no impact on the business side of things. Therefore, we would like some output when you get the report with the dependencies. We want to get additional information on the expected impact of the business code that is using the dependency with the newer version. This probably won't be easy to add, but it would be helpful."

"The general input I have is that there is an opportunity for them to better align with other similar tools and better align with similar capabilities that cloud suppliers deliver natively."

"The tool needs improvement in license compliance. I would like to see the integration of better policy management in the product's future release. When it comes to the organization that I work for, there are a lot of business units since we are a group of companies. Each of these companies has its specific requirements and its own appetite for risk. This should be able to reflect in flexible policies. We need to be able to configure policies that can be adjusted later or overridden by the business unit that is using the product."

"They need to improve the Snyk plugins and make it easier to make your optimizations based on your own needs or features."

"One area where Snyk could improve is in providing developers with the line where the error occurs."

"The solution's reporting and storage could be improved."

"I use Snyk alongside Sonar, and Snyk tends to generate a lot of false positives. Improving the overall report quality and reducing false positives would be beneficial. I don't need additional features; just improving the existing ones would be enough."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The price is good. Snyk had a good price compared to the competition, who had higher pricing than them. Also, their licensing and billing are clear."

"The product has good pricing."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Their licensing model is fairly robust and scalable for our needs. I believe we have reached a reasonable agreement on the licensing to enable hundreds of developers to participate in this product offering. The solution is very tailored towards developers and its licensing model works well for us."

"It is pretty expensive. It is not a cheap product."

"The solution is less expensive than Black Duck."

"Compared to Veracode, Snyk is definitely a cheaper tool."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a three. It is a cheap solution."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

31%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind.

See all answers

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 53% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 31% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 16% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 12% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 7% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

June 2025

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

May 2025

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fugue

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Snyk

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.