IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Cisco TelePresence vs TeamViewer Blizz comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."
  • More Cisco TelePresence Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
    610,518 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary.
    Top Answer:The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    15th
    out of 59 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    1,263
    Comparisons
    874
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    236
    Rating
    8.0
    47th
    out of 59 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    44
    Comparisons
    28
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TelePresence
    Blizz, Blizz by TeamViewer
    Learn More
    Overview
    Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

    Blizz is a web conferencing software designed for global collaboration. It aides users in connecting with contacts and remote teams through video meetings, instant chat messaging, screen sharing, and conference recording on desktop and mobile from any location.

    Offer
    Learn more about Cisco TelePresence
    Learn more about TeamViewer Blizz
    Sample Customers
    Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider32%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise62%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Virtual Meetings
    June 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Zoom Video Communications, 3CX and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: June 2022.
    610,518 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco TelePresence is ranked 15th in Virtual Meetings with 2 reviews while TeamViewer Blizz is ranked 47th in Virtual Meetings. Cisco TelePresence is rated 8.0, while TeamViewer Blizz is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "Responsive support, reliable, and integrates well". On the other hand, Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Webex, Zoom, Cisco Meeting Server, Polycom RealPresence Clariti and Skype for Business, whereas TeamViewer Blizz is most compared with .

    See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

    We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.