


Cisco Secure Firewall and Serverless are both solutions in the security and cloud infrastructure category, with Cisco Secure Firewall often viewed as superior in terms of security features while Serverless is preferred for flexibility.
Features: Cisco Secure Firewall provides advanced threat protection, strong network segmentation, and comprehensive security configurations. Serverless is known for its scalability, rapid application deployment, and cloud-native infrastructure support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Secure Firewall has complex deployment processes needing specialized knowledge, though it benefits from responsive customer service. Serverless offers a more streamlined approach, integrating cloud services for deployment with varied customer support responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Secure Firewall usually requires a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI for security-focused organizations. Serverless significantly lowers infrastructure costs and enables immediate scalability benefits, being a cost-effective choice for those seeking scalable returns.
Clients are now comfortable and not wasting productive hours on IT support.
The automation part is giving us a cost benefit and speed; we can react faster.
It's a very useful tool to mitigate and protect your enterprise.
There is always a return on investment because you find you invest heavily, but your environment is secure and then you are at rest; you do not need to panic.
The biggest return on investment when using Cisco Secure Firewall is that there's no waste in any infrastructure cost and licensing costs for us.
From my point of view, the biggest return on investment when using Cisco Secure Firewall is the single pane of glass, which is a huge plus for us.
It saves money, time, and requires fewer people for a project because one person can handle everything, deploying using a single command, with testing and running all managed seamlessly without needing multiple people for various purposes.
By reducing our monthly infrastructure spend by about 30%, we eliminated the idle capacity costs we were previously paying for underutilized EC2 instances.
We handle deployment more than 80 percent faster, so we do not need to have a specialized DevOps engineer as my full-stack skills cover it.
The quick resolution of issues with Fortinet FortiGate is due to the support of the company and the fact that the equipment is easy to work with.
I would rate the technical support for Fortinet FortiGate a ten out of ten.
As a solution provider, when I encounter problems, I connect directly with Fortinet support, and they provide solutions within a very short time.
I have to provide many logs, yet problems remain unresolved, often requiring workarounds rather than solutions.
I have been working with them on firewalls, wireless, switching, and routing, and the support is the best.
They have expertise and provide solutions for the most difficult problems.
We tried to reach out for some issues and received quick responses.
Whenever we reach out to them, they quickly reply to us.
When issues arise, I rely on AWS for detailed insights, but the lack of direct access can be limiting.
They scale up really well from smaller models like the FortiGate 40 and 50 to bigger sites with the FortiGate 100 for more throughput - up to enterprise datacenters.
The variation comes in terms of the interfaces and throughputs, but from a security perspective, you get the same benefit, irrespective of whether you have an entry-level unit or an enterprise.
We determine sizing based on multiple factors: number of users, available links, traffic types, server count, services in use, and whether services will be published.
When something happens in the device, the failover happens very quickly without any interruption.
Cisco Secure Cloud now allows us to potentially take the management functions of Cisco Secure Firewall, move it into the cloud, and integrate it with other Cisco security products, managing everything from one single pane.
I rate the scalability as a number 10.
For instance, when I launch an app using Serverless and the load increases, the necessary CPU and RAM scale automatically without requiring any additional configuration from me.
It allows users to run multiple requests at the same time and is able to handle even thousands of requests concurrently.
Serverless automatically handles large requests coming to any Lambda and will automatically scale.
We're experiencing 99.999% availability consistently.
I would rate the stability of Fortinet FortiGate a ten out of ten.
Currently, we are experiencing a general outage of one of the main internet service providers of the Dominican Republic, and we have not been impacted in our operations because with SD-WAN, we have another internet service provider and we are working with the second WAN connection without any disruption.
We have often encountered split-brain scenarios during failover processes and code upgrades, which have been persistent problems for us.
We work with a cluster with high availability, so if something goes wrong, we have it functioning.
Cisco Secure Firewall offers exceptional performance and stability.
With five years of experience using Serverless services from AWS, I have encountered no outages or issues.
Serverless is stable and very responsive.
We have seen significantly higher uptime compared to our previous setup because the platform handles all the underlying patching and scaling automatically.
These sessions should be around five to ten minutes long, allowing users and partners to quickly grasp the information without disrupting their daily tasks.
It would be better for customers to get immediate replacements even with a standard subscription.
It is how quickly each of these companies adapts to that and brings in more value to the customer.
My ongoing complaint for the last six years has been the lack of CLI functionality, which hinders my ability to work on the firewall, alongside concerns regarding deployment time.
The GUI is useless for me and frustrates me to a very high degree, which led me to switch to the CLI for configuration.
Firewall as a Service can scale to a very large extent because it is a cloud-based offering that can scale up to a very large number, which is not a problem.
It cannot run long-running processes, which keeps it from being a perfect ten.
Beyond latency, I believe better observability and debugging tools for distributed Serverless architecture are critical.
Probably it would have an integration with something like Terraform or another alternative.
It offers cost savings as it is generally cheaper than the competition.
It is about 20% cheaper.
The advantages of Fortinet FortiGate over its competitors include good pricing and meeting our requirements at a lower cost.
It's good to have them, however, it costs us a lot.
Basically, the license for the VPNs is for all the interfaces, and that is the thing that is really expensive compared with Palo Alto.
It's considered a premium, but people pay that price for Cisco.
I recently feel the licensing is a bit expensive.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I find the pricing model quite efficient for us, as we only pay for execution time in a pay-per-use model, eliminating the idle costs we saw with traditional servers.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing experience, I find the application to be very cost-effective.
They put in a thing called the FortiCookbook, which is very easy to read with real-life scenarios that make networking tasks like joining networks very straightforward.
The firewall and VPN features are the most valuable in protecting our customers' networks.
The most valuable feature is the deep inspection for traffic, which is capable of identifying zero-day attacks.
What stands out positively about Cisco is their training and support, which has effectively prepared engineers to work with their products.
This is very important to my organization, as we work extensively with security because we are a bank, so we can keep the data safe.
Cisco Secure Firewall allows me to safeguard Layer 7 or Layer 3 and manage the security rules with the business needs of my organization.
Serverless integrates with my existing tech stack and other tools seamlessly; it works flawlessly and is a service of its own, so it does not really affect anything else.
Serverless improves the release speed and deployment speed significantly compared to earlier when we used to deploy using Lambda SAM, reducing deployment time and becoming less error-prone, making it very useful.
If you want to scale up, then Serverless is the best way. It is scalable and more secure, and it is on-demand, so it is easy to reduce or increase the load based on our needs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Secure Firewall | 7.5% |
| Fortinet FortiGate | 15.1% |
| OPNsense | 8.5% |
| Other | 68.9% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Serverless | 0.3% |
| Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect | 8.9% |
| LeanIX | 7.6% |
| Other | 83.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 370 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 138 |
| Large Enterprise | 195 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 192 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 130 |
| Large Enterprise | 236 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Fortinet FortiGate is a versatile network security tool offering features like VPN, firewall, web filtering, intrusion prevention, and scalability. It is known for its performance and integration with other Fortinet products, making it a preferred choice for robust cybersecurity.
Fortinet FortiGate stands out as a comprehensive cybersecurity solution with strong performance and ease of configuration. It delivers unified threat management, integrating features such as dynamic routing, SD-WAN support, and centralized management. Despite its strengths, improvements in the web interface's stability, pricing structures, and reporting capabilities are needed. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and automation advancements to enhance the experience further. These enhancements, alongside improvements in bandwidth management and the reduction of licensing costs, are points of interest for users looking to capitalize on FortiGate's extensive capabilities.
What are Fortinet FortiGate's key features?Fortinet FortiGate is widely implemented across industries as a primary firewall system for securing internet gateways and safeguarding data centers. It supports businesses in achieving SD-WAN integration and enhances cybersecurity by providing essential features like antivirus, web filtering, and application control. Enterprises utilize FortiGate for securing remote connections and ensuring compliance with security standards, making it adaptable for different network sizes and industries.
Cisco Secure Firewall provides comprehensive network security with advanced features such as application visibility, URL filtering, and malware protection. It combines a user-friendly interface with robust VPN capabilities, making it a reliable choice for varying network environments and industry applications.
Cisco Secure Firewall offers exceptional protection with its integration into Cisco's broader ecosystem, ensuring enhanced threat detection and policy unification. Despite its complexity in command-line interfaces and management, Cisco Secure Firewall remains a potent tool for safeguarding data. It is widely adopted for edge security, VPN services, perimeter defense, and traffic segmentation, especially in hybrid settings. Essential sectors like banking and telecom benefit from its stable connectivity and centralized security management. Though there are challenges with costs and support for third-party APIs, the firewall's scalability and high availability provide comprehensive support for protecting network assets.
What are the key features of Cisco Secure Firewall?Cisco Secure Firewall is widely implemented across sectors like banking, education, ISPs, and telecoms. It fortifies data centers and network edge security, delivering strong protection for client access, hybrid environments, and intrusion prevention. In these industries, firewall solutions ensure secure connectivity and manage RTU traffic effectively, leveraging centralized management and integration with Cisco's security tools.
Serverless revolutionizes application architecture by eliminating the need for server management, offering a scalable, cost-efficient approach for modern development needs. It enables developers to focus on writing code without the complexities of infrastructure handling.
Originally designed for enhancing agility, Serverless provides on-demand function execution, ensuring seamless scalability and rapid deployment. As a back-end architecture, it allows businesses to execute code in response to events and automatically manage the required resources, optimizing resource usage and minimizing idle capacity. This approach abstracts server provisioning, allowing developers to streamline workflow and focus on creating innovative solutions without dealing with infrastructure concerns.
What are Serverless's key features?Serverless finds application across industries such as e-commerce, where it handles app backends, and finance, for managing real-time data processing tasks. Its flexibility supports a diverse range of enterprise needs, including automated data collection in retail and transaction processing in banking.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.