Cisco MDS Series vs Everpure FlashArray comparison

The compared Cisco and Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) solutions aren't in the same category. Cisco is ranked #4 in ES , with an average rating of 10.0, and holds a 6.7% mindshare in the category. Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) is ranked #4 in AFS , with an average rating of 8.9, and holds a 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) users who would recommend it.

Cisco MDS Series

Read 9 Cisco MDS Series reviews

991 Views
922 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Everpure FlashArray

Read 211 Everpure FlashArray reviews

11,342 Views
9,527 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Cisco MDS Series

Everpure FlashArray

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco MDS Series and Everpure FlashArray based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Enterprise SAN.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise SAN Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise SAN

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco MDS Series

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise SAN (4th)

Everpure FlashArray

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

211

Ranking in other categories

All-Flash Storage (4th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Storage Solutions solutions, they serve different purposes. Cisco MDS Series is designed for Enterprise SAN and holds a mindshare of 6.7%, down 9.0% compared to last year.
Everpure FlashArray, on the other hand, focuses on All-Flash Storage, holds 7.7% mindshare, up 6.3% since last year.

Enterprise SAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco MDS Series	6.7%
Dell PowerStore	23.3%
Dell PowerVault	21.2%
Other	48.8%

Enterprise SAN

All-Flash Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Pure Storage FlashArray	7.7%
Dell PowerStore	13.8%
NetApp AFF	8.7%
Other	69.8%

All-Flash Storage

Featured Reviews

OğuzKalaycı

system engineer at Yaşar Holding

Ensures consistent availability during updates and integrates seamlessly

I am using Cisco MDS in SAN environments for storage connections and server connections The product is very stable and performs well. During the update periods, the devices do not need to reload, ensuring constant availability. It is easy to set up and use. I do not have a central management…

Read full review

Sowjanya MV

Technical Lead at Wipro Limited

Has improved performance for mission-critical workloads and enabled seamless non-disruptive upgrades

The availability is 99.99%, which is the main factor any customer would need because their data should be available whenever they want to access it. This is one main critical thing. It is very easy to upgrade since Pure Storage FlashArray handles it well. Everything is non-disruptive now; previously, there were forklift shifts, but now that is not the case. Pure Storage FlashArray says no to forklift upgrades. Usually hardware requires downtime, but Pure Storage FlashArray has improved their footprint so that they are not asking for downtime; everything is just a non-disruptive activity, which is why customers are more inclined towards Pure Storage FlashArray. Customers want more of the models in their environment due to the performance they are giving, and everything is in one Pure1 Array console where we can view all the models on one page or just an orchestration tool. You don't miss anything; you have replication, notifications about replication, and details about which host groups replication is happening in and if that replication is successful or failed. On a daily basis, our purpose is to create volumes for infrastructure; our daily activities include creating volumes and mapping them to the host, doing any migrations from a VM, clearing the data stores, and carving the volumes to those VMs. One key factor is the data compression with a ratio of 5:1, focusing on space efficiency, inline deduplication, and the compression Pure Storage FlashArray works on; that is a major factor we can suggest to any customer. Analytical capabilities are crucial. Daily, we check the throughput and consumption, and Pure Storage FlashArray provides predictions for one year regarding usage. This prediction helps plan updates well ahead. For support, we just raise a case, and they follow up and get it done. There is also AI readiness, but with the model R2, we don't have much of that AI readiness. For others, we do have AI readiness that predicts capacity based on daily or monthly trends, enabling us to analyze how much space we need or if we need to expand the disk shelf. From an operational point of view, a good feature is that if you accidentally delete a volume, it will be retained in the destroyed state for the next twenty-four hours, which is not the same with any other vendor. I have worked in this storage domain for the past fifteen years, and this option is remarkable, benefiting any L1 or L2 engineer. Additionally, from a compliance perspective, Pure Storage FlashArray has REST APIs enabled. I have not explored automation much, but from a security standpoint, it is strong with encryption data. If you want to automate, you can easily integrate with all clouds and explore Pure Cloud for scheduling workloads, including volume creation. Customers find benefit in Pure Storage FlashArray's single management pane of glass due to the dual controller and active-active setup. If one of the controllers goes down, all workloads automatically shift to the other controller, ensuring their data is safe and accessible at all times. This is a highlighted feature that any customer desires because their data should always be accessible. For SAN workloads, we use Pure Storage FlashArray because for SAN FC fiber channel, we don't use it; we use NetApp for NAS activities. We have clearly split this, so SAN is for mission-critical applications, while network-attached storage handles file systems. This architecture helps us maximize the benefit from Pure Storage FlashArray due to the significant workloads from this giant retail client. From a footprint and energy consumption perspective, you can see energy consumption from the Pure1 storage portal on a daily basis, and it is very compact. The three models we use consume only three units, which is quite low. From a footprint and data center perspective, it doesn't occupy much space. As everything moves to cloud, there are requirements to avoid excess spending on data centers, and Pure Storage FlashArray is efficient in energy consumption and is environmentally friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SAN switches in Cisco MDS Series are a valuable feature of the solution for our company."

"The product is very stable and performs well."

"The issues with these switches are extremely rare, and the whole product line is very predictable and stable."

"The features I found most valuable are the ease of deployment, it's easy to upgrade, easy to configure and easy to administer. There is no need for vendor professional services which saves project cost. The usage of WebUI for all primary features like hostname, IP address, SNMP traps, zone sets, addition and deletion of zone members or zone sets, backup of switch DB is very simple."

"The most valuable feature of the Cisco MDS Series is security."

"The product is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of the Cisco MDS Series is its reliability, support, and scalability."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the devices, databases, and zoning."

"In Pure Storage FlashArray, the dedupe and compression are excellent, and performance is good too."

"Running SAP on Pure Storage helps a lot without doing any further tuning to improve application performance. Our internal clients are happy."

"The most valuable features are extremely low latency, high IOPS with VMware, inline deduplication and compression."

"The stability of Pure Storage is very very good."

"Before we used Pure Storage it took 93 days of employees who run the database to back up and restore databases. The scale of deployment basically went from several days to a few minutes."

"It simplifies storage."

"The job of support for the storage engineers dramatically changed. We know more quickly the automation of the provisioning. We can now focus on things that bring more value to the company than just managing storage."

"It is an SSD array that has awesome performance, low submillisecond latency, and does what it is supposed to do. It just works, which is difficult for things to do anymore."

More Everpure FlashArray pros

Cons

"The solution's management interface and GUI need improvement."

"The product is very expensive."

"Cisco MDS Series could improve by adding more gigahertz. However, they are doing this over time."

"The licensing model could be less complicated."

"Cisco MDS Series can improve by having API functionality for automation and programming."

"It is quite a stable product. It should be shipped with the latest firmware to avoid download and upload schema at the beginning of the initial setup. There should also be the possibility of downgrading the firmware when required. WebUI needs DCNM instead a web-based GUI should be made available like Brocade san switch."

"The GUI client is Java-based and we know that Java is not secure, so everyone disables it."

"I do not have a central management software to manage these products due to the licensing cost. It would be beneficial to have central management software for easier handling."

"The internal garbage collection process has been fixed recently in some OS updates so it is more efficient but that could be just a little better."

"I would like some performance analytics which go deeper than today. It should be specific to some hosts and applications. This would be good."

"If we suddenly dump large amounts of data onto the storage system, it takes a while to process it."

"It was a little costly. The price was ultimately higher than both of the other solutions that we evaluated. I'd say that's the only downside."

"I would like some form of QoS implemented. As a service provider, it would be beneficial to have it."

"A three wave application or multi wave application synchronization would be an improvement."

"Pure Storage support could be a little better."

"If I need to change or troubleshoot the dashboard, I cannot do it without calling support. If I want to move something critical, I cannot do it by myself. The dashboard blocks me from changing those critical things."

More Everpure FlashArray cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the Cisco MDS Series is high."

"It's perpetual licensing and maintenance is a recurrent cost."

"Pricing cannot be considered an advantageous trait of the solution since it is expensive. I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost has room for improvement."

"Price is about the only thing that's wrong with it. A little bit better pricing would be great."

"We have seen a reduction in total cost of ownership."

"The price is too high."

"We have 16 or 18 arrays. We like to do the three-year support model so that we get Evergreen and therefore, we get free upgrades. We pay around more than 1.5 million dollars."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price of the solution can be a bit expensive. There is an additional fee for support."

"When I last looked, the prices were reasonable, and we could get an excellent array for about $60,000."

More Everpure FlashArray pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise SAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	63
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	143

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco MDS Series?

The pricing could be improved as the solution is very expensive. I am on a yearly payment basis.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco MDS Series?

I do not have a central management software to manage these products due to the licensing cost. It would be beneficial to have central management software for easier handling.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco MDS Series?

I am using Cisco MDS in SAN environments for storage connections and server connections.

See all answers

Which should I choose: HPE 3PAR StoreServ or Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series?

Both are great platforms, but if you are considering all flash solutions, I would recommend you to consider Pure Storage. It may be more expensive, but it should pay for itself for its functionalit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashArray?

I don't really know much about the pricing for Pure Storage FlashArray in terms of the absolute cost. Regarding Evergreen, the way they do it, Evergreen One, for example, is a utility model. So the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashArray?

Despite liking Pure Storage FlashArray, there is room for improvement in automation. Pure Storage FlashArray needs to enhance this aspect compared to other products. Even though Pure Storage FlashA...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell Connectrix vs Cisco MDS Series

Compared 23% of the time

INFINIDAT InfiniBox vs Cisco MDS Series

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerVault vs Cisco MDS Series

Compared 10% of the time

IBM SAN24B-4 Express vs Cisco MDS Series

Compared 10% of the time

IBM SAN768B vs Cisco MDS Series

Compared 9% of the time

More Cisco MDS Series Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 15% of the time

NetApp AFF vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 10% of the time

VAST Data vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 7% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 7% of the time

More Everpure FlashArray Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise SAN

February 2026

Download Cisco MDS Series product report

Buyer's Guide

Everpure FlashArray

March 2026

Download Everpure FlashArray product report

Also Known As

Cisco MDS 9100, Cisco MDS 9222i, Cisco MDS 9700

Pure Storage FlashArray

Overview

Cisco MDS 9000 Series Switches have met and often exceeded the demanding requirements for storage area networks for more than a decade. They offer a combination of performance, non-stop operations, and multiprotocol flexibility.

Cisco

Everpure Storage FlashArray delivers simplicity, speed, and performance with ease of management and data reduction capabilities. Its resilience and seamless upgrades complement its integration with VMware, while predictive analytics and proactive support enhance reliability.

Everpure Storage FlashArray leverages a flash-based architecture for improved storage efficiency, reduced footprint, and outstanding data management through deduplication and compression. Users appreciate its single pane of glass management and Evergreen model. It supports VMware environments effectively, offering predictive analytics for better operational insights. The system is noted for its user-friendly management and proactive support, ensuring minimal downtime while delivering resilient storage solutions.

What Key Features Does Everpure Storage FlashArray Offer?

Simplicity and Speed: Easy management and rapid performance enhancements.
Data Reduction: Effective deduplication and compression.
Flash Architecture: Seamless upgrades and outstanding resilience.
VMware Integration: Excellent compatibility with virtualization platforms.
Predictive Analytics: Strong insights for proactive management.

What Benefits Should Users Consider?

Reliability: Proactive support with minimal downtime.
Efficiency: Reduced storage footprint and enhanced data management.
Performance: Faster processing speeds and low latency.
User Experience: Simplified management with Evergreen model.

In industries like finance, banking, and healthcare, Everpure Storage FlashArray supports high-performance storage needs focusing on virtualization and database environments. Employed for VMware workloads, disaster recovery, and storage provisioning, it ensures application performance in private or hybrid cloud setups while enhancing management of virtualized environments.

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)

Sample Customers

National Rugby League

Nielsen, Lamar Advertising, LinkedIn, Betfair, UT-Dallas

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Enterprise SAN. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.