Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Dell PowerSwitch Managed Campus comparison

"Multicast is an advanced feature that helps alleviate some of our work challenges."

"I think the VMA architecture is valuable."

"Tech support has always been good."

"Being able to deal with multiple VLANs to segment the network logically is the biggest feature for us. The management of these switches is okay for us. These switches work very well, and they meet our needs."

"Cisco Ethernet Switches are stable."

"Multicast is a great feature of this product."

"The features that I have found most valuable with Cisco switches are that once you get your configuration you can rest assured that it will work. The OS is not going to be failing intermittently or anything like that. Once you get your configuration end-goal right, the firmware and the OS are usually very stable enough to work a long time without support. Support is needed once in a while. My experience is that the Cisco switches are usually rocket."

"Cisco is the world leader in these systems. The expertise they have is very good compared to others. We can trust Cisco from a technical perspective."

"I have found some of the key features of the solution are it can be configured similar to Cisco, it is secure, easy to use, and the dashboard works well."

"The typical areas of concern for Cisco Ethernet Switches are not technical but cost including support costs. I’ve never liked the fact that end users cannot download security patches without a support contract. I’ve had trouble getting approval to renew Cisco support contracts due to the cost."

"The user interface could be improved."

"The local support resources for Cisco in Bangledesh are very poor and should be increased."

"I don't like the fact that the product is very expensive."

"If we can have fewer bugs on our switches, that would be great. We had bugs that caused the switch to reboot. There is probably a problem with the software."

"In the future, some of the features could be updated to support the latest functions."

"We'd like the pricing to be lowered."

"There is room for improvement in terms of cost."

"In some configurations, I am unable to use two switches as one and it causes some problems."

"The price is a bit on the high side."

"Price is a pain point for us. We've lost a lot of bids, and the reason has been that we majorly quoted Cisco devices. Some of our competitors quoted other devices like Ubiquity or Microchip. Some even quoted this Chinese product TP-Link, and they won the bid over us because we quoted Cisco. Meanwhile, the major reason why we quoted Cisco is reliability and stability from day one. They also last longer. The prices could be worked on so that they become more affordable. We had to deploy a city-wide WiFi network, and we were working in conjunction with Google. Because of the price, even Google recommended a product called Ruckus, so we used Ruckus over Cisco. Its price and license were the main reasons. You have to pay to renew the license every year. Even though you also renew the licenses for Ruckus, but they are much cheaper than Cisco. So, while I would recommend Cisco any time, the trouble remains with the pricing."

"The pricing is reasonable so I rate it a six out of ten."

"We are happy with the pricing from Cisco."

"The price of this solution is good."

"Customers have to pay for some of the L3 switches licenses, which are expensive."

"We get the SMARTnet and one of the switches has that Cisco ONE licensing. It's probably running about $12,000 a year right now."

"The cost of Cisco Ethernet Switches is expensive."

"The price of the solution is fair."