We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Venn Software based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."
"The UI is user-friendly."
"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the automation and information that it provides in the reports."
"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."
"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes."
"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."
"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."
"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."
"They can support the remaining languages that are currently not supported. They can also create a different model that can identify zero-day attacks. They can work on different patterns to identify and detect zero-day vulnerability attacks."
"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."
"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."
"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."
"Checkmarx could be improved with more integration with third-party software."
"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."
"There is nothing particular that I don't like in this solution. It can have more integrations, but the integrations that we would like are in the roadmap anyway, and they just need to deliver the roadmap. What I like about the roadmap is that it is going where it needs to go. If I were to look at the roadmap, there is nothing that is jumping out there that says to me, "Yeah. I'd like something else on the roadmap." What they're looking to deliver is what I would expect and forecast them to deliver."
"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."
"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."
"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."
"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Venn Software is ranked 28th in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Venn Software is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Venn Software writes "Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Venn Software is most compared with Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Microsoft Intune. See our Checkmarx One vs. Venn Software report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
