Checkmarx One vs Kore.ai comparison

Read 11 Kore.ai reviews

1,912 Views
363 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Kore.ai based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two AI Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Kore.ai Report (Updated: April 2026).

Checkmarx One vs. Kore.ai

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in AI Security

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd)

Kore.ai

Ranking in AI Security

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Agent Builders (7th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (10th), AI Customer Support (5th), AI IT Support (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the AI Security category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 2.0%, down from 14.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kore.ai is 0.7%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	2.0%
Kore.ai	0.7%
Other	97.3%

AI Security

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Judin Augustin

Associate Data Scientist at Guide House

Automation has reduced large call centers and provides real-time outbound support for patients

Kore.ai is a low-code platform, and you do not necessarily have to be an expert in artificial intelligence or generative AI to use this platform. However, if you have that experience, it will be a valuable add-on. The main advantage is that it has almost every kind of plugin available to use, whether for live agents or if you want to use it as a call center. You have real-time capabilities and the most useful plugins available, with almost every kind of model available with configurations. We can configure the ML models and train them. The platform is very user-friendly with explanatory features and a great UI. One significant feature is the live testing platform with Kore.ai. When you are creating a workflow, you have an interactive, real-time testing platform that reflects every change you make. This makes it easy to debug errors or add new features. Additionally, Kore.ai has many different tools and platforms that cater to different needs, whether for a call center, normal workflow, or machine learning workflow, which is really useful. Because of Kore.ai, it was much easier than creating something manually. A low-code platform always helps, and when that platform has this much capability, it provides far more value than manual development. It was particularly helpful for our team that we could create a POC and get that project into production. Kore.ai helped our team build a generative AI outbound calling chatbot, and it truly helped our customers. If you have a hospital with a thousand employees in a call center, you might consider outsourcing. However, with Kore.ai's outbound calling capabilities, you can eliminate the outsourcing part. You do not need a thousand call center employees. You can accomplish this through automation with just one or two employees if people need to switch to agents. This represented a significant cost reduction.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest advantage we have seen is that we're able to develop and deliver secure solutions in a faster time."

"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."

"What I like best about Checkmarx is that it has fewer false positives than other products, giving you better results."

"The tool's valuable features include integrating GPT and Copilot. Additionally, the UI web representation is very user-friendly, making navigation easy. GPT has made several improvements to my security code."

"We are using Checkmarx for analyzing threats."

"Checkmarx offers many valuable features, including Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Infrastructure as Code (IAC), Supply Chain Security, and API Security."

"The most valuable feature for me is the Jenkins Plugin."

"It moved our organization towards being agile vs. waterfall."

More Checkmarx One pros

"Kore.ai helped us integrate a lot through documentation and trial and error, making it straightforward to integrate overall, resulting in a very good experience for first-timers."

"The best feature of Kore.ai is that it is a cost-saving tool because when we use IVR, we have to assign agents at the backend, but using Kore.ai, we can automate all of those functions."

"Kore.ai has positively impacted our organization by reducing error rates from around fifteen to twenty percent to just two to three percent after implementation."

"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization, as it saved a lot of time in implementation and the proof of concept was very fast to implement and easy to develop."

"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by helping us build intelligent chatbots and incorporating voice agents, enabling various clients to adopt these solutions, which have been revolutionary for their businesses."

"It impacted my organization by helping us move into being AI-native, and it helped a lot to show other clients that we have worked in AI."

"The positive impacts we have seen include expected reductions in average handle time, which is typically around 40 to 50 percent for any BFSI industry use case."

"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by being a big money saver because before having our chatbot, the use case was that every time some of our customers needed help, they used to call a number."

More Kore.ai pros

Cons

"We can run only one project at a time."

"Scanning speed optimization is an area where improvements can be made, and we can reduce false positives."

"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."

"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."

"I think the CxAudit tool has room for improvement. At the beginning you can choose a scan of a project, but in any event the project must be scanned again (wasting time)."

"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."

"Checkmarx One can be improved by reducing noise and improving false positive filtering."

"Unfortunately, Checkmarx doesn't do any automated backups which is quite inconvenient."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Customer support is okay, I guess. We get what we want from them whenever there is an issue or something, but sometimes when we had issues, it was delayed a lot."

"I would suggest incorporating pre-recorded videos in the tutorials and enhancing the documentation area to make it more user-friendly."

"In my experience, Kore.ai is not stable."

"The two points I deduct relate to the integrations, which were not as extensive as I initially expected."

"I rated Kore.ai an 8 out of 10 because additional features could be added to it."

"I choose 7.5 out of 10 for Kore.ai because a few things already need to be improved, one of which I have mentioned."

"Customer support is where Kore.ai has significant room for improvement. Post-implementation support is a particularly discouraging aspect for me."

"Kore.ai can be improved by enhancing their documentation, which is currently a bit disorganized."

More Kore.ai cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"It's relatively expensive."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"It is an expensive solution."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

What needs improvement with Checkmarx?

One way Checkmarx One could be improved is if it could automatically run scans every month after implementation. If it is possible to set it in the SAST portal to scan the repositories automaticall...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kore.ai?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is comparatively lower than other companies and tools available.

What needs improvement with Kore.ai?

Kore.ai can be improved by enhancing their documentation, which is currently a bit disorganized. They should include detailed videos or workshops. There are not many videos or community resources a...

What is your primary use case for Kore.ai?

My main use case for Kore.ai was creating an outbound calling generative AI-powered chatbot, which is useful for insurance and healthcare companies.

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 37% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Sierra vs Kore.ai

Compared 11% of the time

NICE CXone vs Kore.ai

Compared 10% of the time

Agentforce vs Kore.ai

Compared 9% of the time

Ada vs Kore.ai

Compared 7% of the time

AGAT Software Pragatix AI Firewall vs Kore.ai

Compared 7% of the time

More Kore.ai Competitors

Product Reports

Download Checkmarx One product report

Checkmarx One

May 2026

Download Kore.ai product report

May 2026

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Kore.ai provides advanced tools like Agent Desktop and Agent Co-pilot, designed to handle vast data volumes and improve efficiency. The platform integrates seamlessly with APIs and channels, supports multi-language capabilities, and offers real-time testing.

Kore.ai offers robust solutions for sectors like healthcare and aviation, enabling efficient ML model configuration and generative AI chatbot development. While there's room for improvement in language detection and scalability, particularly with Azure, Kore.ai excels in integrating with Microsoft ASR, TTS, Cloud Anthropic, and OpenAI, enhancing performance in industries such as insurance and healthcare. Users see potential in extending capabilities with advanced models like Claude or Anthropic. The post-implementation support could improve to match competitor offerings, and more comprehensive documentation is needed.

What are the key features of Kore.ai?

Agent Desktop: Streamlines customer interactions and reduces handle time
Agent Co-pilot: Assists agents with data handling and task efficiency
Advanced API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity across platforms
Real-time Interactive Testing: Facilitates immediate testing and feedback
Low-code Configurator: Simplifies chatbot development and ML configuration

What benefits should users look for?

Operational Efficiency: Improved task handling and reduced costs
Scalability: Well-suited for diverse applications, though needs enhancement on Azure
Language Support: Global reach with multilingual features
Improved Customer Satisfaction: Enhanced interaction quality and faster resolutions

Kore.ai finds applications in banking, aviation, and automotive, facilitating real-time transactions, ticket booking, and customer feedback measurement. It is instrumental in creating AI chatbots for HR and customer services. Industries such as insurance and healthcare benefit from its capabilities in policy tracking and implementation, leveraging integrations with Microsoft ASR, TTS services, and OpenAI for superior chatbot functionality.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Leading banks & Enterprise Companies