Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony Mobile vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point Harmony Mobile enhances security, reduces breaches, and improves efficiency, offering valued protection and cost savings for users.
Sentiment score
7.3
Prisma Access enhances security, reduces costs, and simplifies operations, offering great ROI and scalability with integrated insights and technology consolidation.
It reduced the cost of data breaches.
Incidents have dropped by around 15% since we started using Check Point Harmony Mobile.
Our ROI with Harmony Mobile has been strong, we have prevented multiple phishing and malware incidents in mobile devices saving time, potential breaches, and compliance-related costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Check Point Harmony Mobile support is responsive and knowledgeable, with prompt resolutions, despite occasional delays and language barriers.
Sentiment score
6.8
Prisma Access support is efficient and knowledgeable, but users seek faster response times and improved language-specific expertise.
Their team is responsive, knowledgeable and proactive in resolving issues and providing guidance.
The support for Check Point Harmony Mobile was excellent, both for technical support and other aspects.
There were a few initial hiccups with certain applications, but Check Point Harmony Mobile support helped us resolve those quickly.
The product is reliable, making customer support less frequently needed.
We rarely need to contact support due to having a strong internal team and a robust product.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Check Point Harmony Mobile excels in scalability and integration, fitting various infrastructures and enabling flexible, seamless organizational expansion.
Sentiment score
7.6
Prisma Access excels in scalability and flexibility, though challenges exist in extensive deployments and complex integrations at large scales.
Check Point Harmony Mobile is scalable and can be integrated with our existing security infrastructure.
Harmony mobile scales easily with growing device fleets making it well suited for both small teams and large enterprises.
Check Point Harmony Mobile's scalability is good, and I have been able to add more users or devices easily as my organization has grown.
To scale, one would need to upgrade or acquire more hardware.
Prisma Access provides significant scalability, allowing integration of different systems.
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is a cloud-based solution, and from my experience, there are no issues with scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point Harmony Mobile is highly reliable with stable performance, minimal issues, and excellent data protection across devices.
Sentiment score
7.9
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is praised for stable performance and reliability, with minimal downtime even during updates.
Harmony mobile has proven to be highly stable in our environment with consistent performance and no major downtime or crashes.
Check Point Harmony Mobile is absolutely stable with no downtime, and it is working excellently.
I think the stability of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is excellent, and I would rate it ten out of ten.
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks works efficiently during peak usage times.
GlobalProtect is a satisfying solution, and the product is robust without major stability issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Harmony Mobile requires improvements in usability, integration, cost-effectiveness, feature parity, performance, and customization for better efficiency.
Prisma Access needs better documentation, integration, and pricing, alongside UI, authentication, and global coverage improvements for enhanced user experience.
While it is worth the investment given the increased security and improved user experience, it is definitely a significant expense.
Check Point Harmony Mobile is strong but could improve in reducing alert fatigue, sometimes we get too many notifications which can overwhelm users and IT staff.
I would like to see improved speed, overall speed, and customization in the reporting.
Hosting it in the cloud can mitigate these issues by allowing connection through the nearest Palo Alto or Prisma Cloud regional hub.
There is a lack of integration with third-party solutions like CrowdStrike or SentinelOne in Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Harmony Mobile is expensive but justified by security, and negotiation or bundling can reduce costs for installations.
Prisma Access is costly but valued for comprehensive security features, though licensing complexity and extra support costs are concerns.
It is a significant expense, but it is worth the investment given the increased security and improved user experience.
Harmony Mobile's pricing is per device and generally affordable especially when bundled with other harmony solutions.
The pricing for Check Point Harmony Mobile was higher than expected, but the setup cost and other aspects were a good experience.
The pricing is on the higher side, rating it around eight to nine out of ten.
From my experience, Palo Alto is more expensive compared to solutions like Netskope and Triscale.
Pricing for Prisma Access and Prisma SD WAN is high due to the need for different hardware flavors like IONs.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Harmony Mobile offers real-time threat detection, ease of use, and seamless integration for comprehensive mobile security.
Prisma Access offers robust security features, seamless integration, and real-time alerts, making it ideal for reliable organizational protection.
Check Point Harmony Mobile's advanced threat prevention capabilities have been very effective in blocking these threats.
Network protection especially against unsafe wifi has been crucial for securing remote work.
Check Point Harmony Mobile has positively impacted my organization by saving time and providing better security.
These features are security-driven, providing robust protection against increasing cyber threats by integrating NG Firewalls, SD WAN, and CASB, all within a fully cloud-native solution.
GlobalProtect has been beneficial for its cloud security capabilities, which are vital as businesses seek hybrid options and need to support remote workers while addressing latency issues.
One of the most valuable features of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is the ability to manage on-premise firewalls.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony Mobile
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Threat Defense (1st)
Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
64
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (3rd), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (1st), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (6th), ZTNA as a Service (2nd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Check Point Harmony Mobile is designed for Mobile Threat Defense and holds a mindshare of 12.8%, down 16.9% compared to last year.
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, on the other hand, focuses on Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), holds 15.5% mindshare, down 18.9% since last year.
Mobile Threat Defense Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point Harmony Mobile12.8%
Zimperium30.5%
Lookout24.9%
Other31.80000000000001%
Mobile Threat Defense
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks15.5%
Netskope12.3%
Cato SASE Cloud Platform11.8%
Other60.4%
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
 

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Ensuring remote work security with effective protection for Mobile device access
Check point harmony mobile is strong but could improve in reducing alert fatigue, sometimes we get too many notification which can overwhelm users and IT staff. Making alerts smarter or more customizable would help focus attention on the most critical threats. Also enhanced reporting with more detailed insights and easier integration with other security tools would be great. In the future versions adding AI-driven threat prediction and automated remediation could take the solution to the next level.
Amar-Patil - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables seamless policy management and supports secure remote work
Our primary use case for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is to control the internet and serve as an internet proxy. Additionally, we use it for secure remote work One of the most valuable features of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is the ability to manage on-premise firewalls. We can…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Threat Defense solutions are best for your needs.
866,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Security Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise28
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Mobile?
The most valuable features of the solution are threat emulation, threat extraction, URL detection, antimalware, antivirus, and IPS.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Mobile?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony Mobile was smooth.
What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Mobile?
One area Check Point Harmony Mobile can improve is the cost for the solution itself, which I find a bit expensive, but other than that, most of it should be okay. Cost is indeed the main thing I wo...
What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?
We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...
What do you like most about Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?
The most valuable features of the solution are in the areas of the secure remote access it provides while also being user-friendly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?
From my experience, Palo Alto is more expensive compared to solutions like Netskope and Triscale.
 

Also Known As

Check Point Mobile Access, Check Point SandBlast Mobile
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Prisma Access, GlobalProtect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect Mobile Security Manager, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks, Prisma Access
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, Mississippi Office of the Secretary of State
Concord Hospital, State of Colorado, Essilor International, RheinLand Versicherungsgruppe, University of Westminster, Universidade Nove de Julho, SPAR Austria, CAME Group, ZipRealty, Greenhill & Co., IKT Agder, Aviva Stadium, Animal Logic, Management & Training Corporation, Brigham Young University Hawaii, School District of Chilliwack
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Software Technologies, Lookout, Zimperium and others in Mobile Threat Defense. Updated: August 2025.
866,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.