

Ping Identity Platform and CyberArk Certificate Manager are competing products in the realm of identity and access management. While CyberArk offers strong security features, Ping Identity Platform gains an edge with its robust support and competitive pricing.
Features: Ping Identity Platform excels in seamless integration, scalability, and advanced authentication options. It supports various systems with ease and offers excellent interoperability. CyberArk Certificate Manager shines with strong certificate management capabilities and comprehensive security tools, focusing on security management over integration.
Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could enhance its user management by integrating directly into its interface rather than relying on third-party entities. Improvements in customization could also be beneficial. For CyberArk Certificate Manager, a simpler and less complex deployment process and better user-friendly interfaces would be helpful. Enhancements in integration flexibility can also improve user satisfaction.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform offers straightforward deployment with extensive integration support and responsive customer service. In contrast, CyberArk Certificate Manager, while noted for its security, often requires a more complex deployment and support structure, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve.
Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform provides a competitive pricing model that offers a strong ROI due to its simplicity and ease of integration. CyberArk Certificate Manager tends to be on the higher end in terms of cost; however, for organizations with complex security needs, its extensive features justify the cost, potentially leading to higher long-term ROI.
Earlier, we had an operations team of seven people to manage certificates manually, but now it has reduced costs by reducing the team to two people with the help of the certificate management tool.
CyberArk Certificate Manager is doing its best with multiple layers of security.
I have seen a return on investment in terms of money saved and time saved.
Inquiries are typically addressed the same day, with most issues, even complex ones, resolved within 24 hours.
Venafi's technical support is excellent, with even their first-tier support being in-house and highly competent.
Their technical support is knowledgeable and helpful, making Venafi stand out among other CyberArk products.
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
The problem with the support team is that I do not like support; the day of the threat image, they never come on the call and unless it is a priority, they never come to call to defend it and to provide any kind of solutions.
I would rate the technical support for Ping Identity Platform seven out of ten because of their limited support and late availability.
This role-based access control enhances scalability and efficiency by providing a focused view of necessary information.
Horizontal scaling is a necessity rather than vertical scaling.
Scalability with Venafi is good; you can definitely use it if you have ten thousand certs, a thousand certs, a million, or a couple million.
Venafi's stability has been consistently reliable.
Venafi is a stable product. It's definitely more stable than others.
I observed that in the last year, CyberArk Certificate Manager was down two to three times without any notification.
Ping Identity Platform demonstrates strong stability, as it is not prone to bugs.
In terms of stability for Ping Identity Platform, we haven't faced any issues till now.
Overall, I see PingFederate as a stable product.
Expanding the range of out-of-the-box integrations would significantly improve the user experience.
The yearly DNS verification required by certificate authorities necessitates manual intervention, hindering full automation.
They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns.
I would like to enable ServiceNow Generative AI for auto-diagnosing PingFederate SSO failures and suggest remediation steps.
Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access management, identity management, a solution for API security, a solution for authorization, and a product for identity verification.
There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems.
Venafi offers good value for the cost.
The pricing has increased for us, impacting our organization due to its operational expenditure (OPEX).
For our budget, Venafi's cost is moderate. It's not expensive as internal certificate generation is free, and we only pay for the public CA certificate signer and for storage in Venafi.
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
The most valuable feature of Venafi is the automation that helps save time and reduce human error.
It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices.
What I like best about Venafi is that it's very easy to get somebody on a call and get any of my questions answered.
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
Ping Identity Platform can be accessed both on-premises and in the cloud, allowing for high flexibility in creating user flows and policies tailored to client requirements.
It's a converged platform which can do both identity management, access management, and recently they are bringing privilege management capability as well.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Certificate Lifecycle Manager | 1.9% |
| Ping Identity Platform | 2.9% |
| Other | 95.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
CyberArk Certificate Manager automates and streamlines certificate processes, reducing errors and enhancing efficiency. It centralizes management, supports compliance, and improves certificate lifecycle management with customizable features.
CyberArk Certificate Manager offers a streamlined approach to managing certificates, focusing on automation that minimizes manual intervention and errors. Its discovery and centralized management enhance operational efficiency, while integration capabilities facilitate seamless handling of certificates across systems like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from its user-friendly, intuitive interface, robust reporting, and customizable notifications, which improve compliance, reduce bottlenecks, and allow for custom field creation. Though the on-premises version is mature, there is room for improvement in cloud service integration and out-of-the-box features. Additional enhancements are needed in documentation clarity, hardware security module support, and diverse scripting language support.
What are the most important features of CyberArk Certificate Manager?
What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?
CyberArk Certificate Manager finds applications across multiple industries like finance and healthcare where stringent security protocols are critical. Organizations use it for server authentication and managing application IDs, ensuring compliance and preventing outages. Its integration with major cloud platforms and automation of installations across endpoints makes it an ideal choice for companies focusing on enhancing security and operational efficiency.
Ping Identity Platform offers cloud capabilities for applications, supporting Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and passwordless authentication. It features flexible integrations and federated identity management, enhancing security through detailed compliance features and seamless IDP integration.
This platform meets enterprise needs with role-based access control, device management, API security, and risk-based adaptations. Its BYOD support, ease of integration, biometric authentication methods, and customizable options with PingFederate aid in enhancing security and convenience. Challenges such as the complex management console, network reliability, and limited customization are present. Users find areas for improvement in incident response features, bio-certification, and network handling for IP classification. Community support and documentation need strengthening to address existing device tracking and token management issues.
What are the key features of Ping Identity Platform?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and IT, enterprises deploy Ping Identity Platform for its ability to implement seamless SSO and MFA. It integrates with protocols like SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect to secure communications and user identities. This enhances security and user convenience for customer-facing and internal applications.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.