Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Celigo Integration Platform vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Celigo Integration Platform
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
60th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (52nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (17th)
iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
24th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (16th), Process Mining (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Celigo Integration Platform is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform0.9%
Celigo Integration Platform0.2%
Other98.9%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Celigo Integration Platform?
Share your opinion
Ganesh-Iyer - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps simplify processes of a business
One of the more important updates that have happened lately in the tool is related to the tool's ability to process data mining. What I mean by data mining is that now you have the ability to take the timestamp of the data from the ERP or transactional data, create your process maps, and then try to see how much compliance is actually happening within your processes. The aforementioned area is one capability that has been added to the tool over the last few years. You can now tell with the tool how much of your process is actually following the required path where everything is approved and where it goes for exception handling, how many transactions are going, what type of transactions really get into exceptions, and then take care of the management and make improvements. One of the areas in the product with certain shortcomings where improvements are required includes the tool's reporting capabilities. The ability to get into customer template requirements and then create different reports from the data they have is one area which can be improved.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
866,300 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
6%
University
6%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Non Profit
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about iGrafx?
The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iGrafx?
I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive.
What needs improvement with iGrafx?
If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right. We have a strategic approach for the customer. I was involved in almost 100 sess...
 

Also Known As

Integrator.io
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

docker, glassdoor, peloton, ringcentral, twilio, bluejeans, crossfit, arista, juniper
Multinational Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: August 2025.
866,300 professionals have used our research since 2012.