Cavisson NetDiagnostics vs Instana Dynamic APM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cavisson Logo
131 views|101 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Instana Logo
3,948 views|3,150 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cavisson NetDiagnostics and Instana Dynamic APM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its end-to-end dashboard provides information on all the integration callouts happening on the server side."

More Cavisson NetDiagnostics Pros →

"It is a stable solution.""The most valuable feature of Instana Dynamic APM is auto-instrumentation.""Instana is very fast to implement and deploy because the dashboards are automated and don't need configuration.""With Instana, the interface and the UI are very simple to use.""The platform’s most valuable feature is the ability to monitor the performance of containers for request and response analysis.""Visually, it's very good. It provides everything needed for dynamic detection, which is very useful.""The overall capabilities are the most valuable.""It's great for monitoring services and applications."

More Instana Dynamic APM Pros →

Cons
"They can improve on providing "help and navigation" for each feature available in the UI."

More Cavisson NetDiagnostics Cons →

"The configuration of Instana Dynamic APM needs improvement because it requires quite a bit of work.""The integration could be improved with more plugins or open API.""Many managers, as well as our customers, used to ask for reports, such as "top X number of queries that are slow," or "top pages that have the highest number of issues." This is something that can be improved by Instana. Currently, they don't have that kind of reporting available out-of-the-box.""The App Connect middleware does not integrate with or show corresponding sub nodes.""They could improve the product’s dashboards and provide more dashboard options.""Maybe log monitoring could be better.""The solution's monitoring is pretty weak and should be improved.""While it is already quite good, there is room for improvement in terms of providing better functionality"

More Instana Dynamic APM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing is quite competitive. Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic were all several times more expensive than Instana, both the on-prem and the SaaS versions. Price-wise they are a lot more competitive than anyone else out there."
  • "Its pricing isn't a big pain point. Its pricing seems to be better than some of the other competing products in the market, but they also have some of the features and functionalities that are better than Instana."
  • "The pricing is $1,200 per year which is a bit high compared to other vendors."
  • "The solution is less expensive than one of its competitors."
  • "It's reasonably priced and manageable, especially for individuals who grasp the significance of application monitoring."
  • "The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."
  • "Instana Dynamic APM is more affordable for small and medium-sized companies compared to other vendors."
  • More Instana Dynamic APM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The platform’s most valuable feature is the ability to monitor the performance of containers for request and response analysis.
    Top Answer:Instana Dynamic APM is more affordable for small and medium-sized companies compared to AppDynamics and Dynatrace.
    Top Answer:They could improve the product’s dashboards and provide more dashboard options. Additionally, the server and database monitoring needs enhancement compared to other vendors.
    Ranking
    Views
    131
    Comparisons
    101
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    3,948
    Comparisons
    3,150
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    328
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Cavisson
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Cavisson NetDiagnostics Enterprise (NDE) is a comprehensive Application Performance Management (APM) solution for real-time monitoring, diagnostics and management of distributed processing in your application environment using state of art technologies with minimal overhead. Leading Fortune 500 brands rely on NDE to avert risks, reduce revenue loss, and improve customer loyalty by enabling proactive monitoring and real-time diagnosis of application performance issues.

    Instana’s Enterprise Observability Platform, powered by automated Application Performance Monitoring, discovers and maps all services, infrastructure, and their inter-dependencies automatically. Instana ingests all observability metrics, traces each request, profiles every process, and updates application dependency maps in real-time to deliver the context and actionable feedback needed by Dev+Ops to optimize application performance, enable innovation, and mitigate risk to help them add value and efficiency to the pipeline. Learn more at https://instana.com.

    Sample Customers
    Oracle, Macy's, Redbox, art.com, Pronto Networks, A10 Networks, Renesas, San Jose Medical Group
    Daxko Lifts Fitness Studios Through COVID Regulations with Quick Engineering PivotsAltissia Meets SLAs to Support Student DeadlinesImmocloud Unlocks Observability to Modernize Real EstateEnento Group Boosts Service Reliability with Real-Time Visibility into Application Performance Instana’s Observability for Amazon EKS Helps Yara Deliver Digital Farming Solutions
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise42%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cavisson NetDiagnostics is ranked 87th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Instana Dynamic APM is ranked 23rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 12 reviews. Cavisson NetDiagnostics is rated 10.0, while Instana Dynamic APM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Cavisson NetDiagnostics writes "Improves our application at the code level because of its different performance metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Instana Dynamic APM writes "A really good GUI that is easy for non-technical users to understand". Cavisson NetDiagnostics is most compared with , whereas Instana Dynamic APM is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, New Relic, Elastic Observability and IBM Application Performance Management.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.