We compared Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform and Cato Networks across several parameters based on our user reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Initial Setup: The user reviews for Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform mention varying durations for deployment and setup, ranging from three months for deployment and an additional week for setup to a week for both. Cato Networks users emphasized the importance of considering the context in which terms like deployment, setup, and implementation are used.
Valuable Features: Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is known for its robust security measures, seamless integration with existing systems, advanced analytics, simplicity of use, and reliable customer support. Cato Networks is praised for its excellent network performance and reliability, ease of implementation and management, and comprehensive security features.
Room For Improvement: Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform could benefit from improvements in performance, reliability, and user interface. Cato Networks needs enhancements in network speed and stability, GUI for easier navigation, occasional connectivity issues, faster support response times, and more advanced customization options.
Setup Cost: Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is affordable and offers good value for money, with transparent and flexible licensing terms. Users have also found the cost of Cato Networks to be reasonable, with appreciated flexibility in licensing options.
ROI: Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform offers increased network security, simplified management, improved performance, and cost savings. Cato Networks provides increased efficiency, cost savings, improved network performance, ease of implementation, and secure connectivity across multiple locations. Both platforms offer valuable investment opportunities for businesses.
Customer Service: Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is praised for its commendable customer service, with top-notch assistance and guidance. Cato Networks also provides highly satisfactory customer service, with customers appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team.
Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is preferred over Cato Networks. This choice is based on user feedback that highlights Versa's robust security measures, advanced analytics capabilities, and seamless integration with existing systems. Versa excels in customer service and support, offering top-notch assistance and guidance to ensure a seamless experience for customers. Users have mentioned that Cato Networks could benefit from enhancements in terms of performance, reliability, user interface, and customization options.
"The protection offered by the product is the most valuable feature. It detects vulnerabilities or traps on our users' phones and then prompts them to clean up their devices. Tools we used previously would only discover, which required us to gather information on the backend, so Lookout is a welcome upgrade."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable features are the antivirus as a whole, the anti-malware, and all of the protection features that scan our enterprise devices."
"On the outside, the main differentiation is because Lookout ingest. They have ingested basically all of the apps for the last ten years and all the versions of all the apps, and we have that in a corporate database that allows us to do very large-scale machine learning and analysis on that data set. That's not something that any of the competitors really have the capability to do because they don't have access to the data set. A lot of the apps you can no longer get them because that version of the app is five or six years old, and it just doesn't exist anywhere anymore, except within our infrastructure. So, the ability to have that very rich dataset and learn from that dataset is a real differentiator."
"It's a cloud-based solution that integrates well with everything."
"The feature that I find to be the most valuable is the bandwidth aggregation."
"The product is very simple, and everything can be done very quickly."
"Cato offers all the functionality found in other solution. The life cycle management is always very stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it also works as a next-gen firewall because it has security features."
"The solution is stable."
"When I first encountered Cato, I didn't know how to use it, but after a week of training, I could onboard our systems to it, so the solution was easy to learn and navigate."
"It is quite simple and easy to use."
"It is very easy to deploy. The GUI interface is really good, and the security features are also very good. It is also stable and scalable, and their support is also good."
"I like all the features. We utilize different LAN, bandwidth transferring, bandwidth balancing, and mappings. We use it as a centralized solution, and use the same product at all our locations."
"The initial setup is simple."
"Their dashboard is also a good point for us and the customer. The solution is very clean and easy."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the next-generation firewall features and geo-blocking capabilities."
"Versa is a good centralized solution, where you're setting up your infrastructure in a data center type thing."
"The necessary enhancement pertains to the controller segment, specifically addressing the issue of frequent flapping when a link is left. In the case of Versa Unified, if a link experiences frequent flapping within an entire branch, it triggers instability. Hence, it is imperative that the overall routing system is not contingent solely upon the active dial branches."
"The division of Control Plane and Data Plane is most valuable. It can be deployed anywhere, and you can control it and configure it from anywhere. This is one of the good features of this solution."
More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Pros →
"We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide API to customers so we can query our data and use it in our cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now."
"The stability depends on the service from where you access it. Because sometimes, the place you are in, you have Gateway. You don't have Gateway. The gateway is overutilized. At the end, you need to go through their gateways. And this is the key point here. You have a tracking point. If it's not well orchestrated, and it scales up as you add more to the existing team, you will suffer"
"Lookout was moving into the SSE space. And so their work on SecureWeb Gateway and SD-WAN is still sort of evolving."
"From the analysis that we've done, they do seem to be maybe a step behind in trying to enter the market with a new solution. But when they do pick up, they do come out with some good products."
"The price could be better."
"The different languages in the user interface should be enhanced."
"The solution is not cheap."
"Cato Networks security could be better."
"A little tweaking or improvement of the UI in terms of logging when troubleshooting would be an improvement because it's very detailed."
"They should add more sophisticated security features. It should also be integrated into the cloud."
"They can't do one-to-one NAT (Network Address Translation) in AP (their access point), and that is something that Palo Alto can do."
"We would like the product to continue to improve its security."
"The solution's current customer support is not that good. So, they need to improve that. Also, the solution's UI is quite complex, so they need to simplify it."
"The smaller units lack a lot of functionality."
"The security should be improved."
"The web interface can be improved."
"We've had the odd occasional stability issue with software upgrades."
"With the pandemic and changing work models, it would be ideal if the product more accessibility options or more diversity within the solution itself."
"The stability of FlexVNF's controller and devices could be improved."
"The support needs to be improved."
More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Cons →
More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cato SASE Cloud Platform is ranked 5th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 21 reviews while Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is ranked 8th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 20 reviews. Cato SASE Cloud Platform is rated 8.8, while Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cato SASE Cloud Platform writes "Useful remote worker VPN, centralized management, and simple on-boarding process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform writes "A flexible, stable and scalable solution ". Cato SASE Cloud Platform is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cisco SD-WAN, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet FortiGate and Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform, whereas Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN, Meraki SD-WAN and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange. See our Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform report.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors, best WAN Edge vendors, and best Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.