Catalogic DPX vs Dell Avamar comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Catalogic and Dell Technologies are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Catalogic is ranked #78, while Dell Technologies is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.5. Catalogic holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to Dell Technologies’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution.

Catalogic DPX

Read 2 Catalogic DPX reviews

1,790 Views
1,701 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Dell Avamar

Read 90 Dell Avamar reviews

11,183 Views
10,065 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Catalogic DPX

Dell Avamar

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Dell Avamar and Catalogic DPX compete in the data protection category. Dell Avamar has the upper hand due to its robust deduplication capabilities, making it ideal for virtualized environments, while Catalogic DPX stands out with fast recovery times.

Features: Dell Avamar offers efficient data deduplication, VMware integration, and robust virtual machine backup. Catalogic DPX provides efficient snapshot management, rapid recovery points, and comprehensive data replication features.

Room for Improvement: Dell Avamar needs to enhance scalability, provide more intuitive configuration options, and improve its initial setup process. Catalogic DPX could improve reporting tools, create a smoother upgrade process, and enhance its user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell Avamar’s deployment is straightforward but has a steep learning curve. Its customer service is helpful but could be more responsive. Catalogic DPX is easier to deploy with a less steep learning curve and has supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Dell Avamar’s initial setup cost is higher, but efficient data deduplication leads to long-term savings. Catalogic DPX offers an attractive pricing model with faster ROI due to its quicker recovery capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catalogic DPX

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

78th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Dell Avamar

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Deduplication Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Catalogic DPX is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell Avamar is 1.9%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Dell Avamar	1.9%
Catalogic DPX	0.5%
Other	97.6%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

it_user292722

Data Center Global SAP Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use it to backup some high output critical physical servers, knowing that in case of disaster we could still recover to our VM environment. The user interface needs improvement.

The user interface needs improvement, the selection boxes to select a backup job are very small not adequate for managing 400+ backup jobs, we only see 8 job names in the small scroll window. The scheduler features are lacking, we must edit backup specs to reach the option to change the schedule. The new reporting feature has greatly improved the product, prior to this it was very difficult to have a full view of our backup schedules when scheduling a new job. Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix. We still see a lot of value in the product, but hope that the next few updates will not cause more issues... We wanted a mission critical enterprise solution, and sincerely hope that the future upgrades will bring the product back on track.

Read full review

SamuelThomas

Consultant at Key Information Technology L.L.C.

Have supported critical environments despite room for improvement in legacy backup options

It is very efficient in cyber resilience. Deduplication, automation, and everything is very efficient. It is multi-cloud enabled and has broad protections. The software delivers flexible and efficient backup and recovery options through its cyber resiliency features. Dell PowerProtect Manager provides insights in managing backup processes. Its encryption mechanisms are very efficient, helping to secure sensitive data. Its integration with Dell EMC Data Domain is very good. It is easy to integrate with Data Domain. Multi-cloud options are enabled, and backup in cloud options exist in Dell Avamar.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Catalogic has great features including the ability to P2V from snapvaults, and recently the addition of agent-less backups for Linux."

"By implementing an OVF (docker based) and without any agents on your servers, you’ll get a system which provides you with: Orchestration, Automation DR and Data analytics."

"Technical support for this solution was great."

"We've found the product to be stable."

"The tool's most valuable features are backup management and speed."

"The function I find most valuable in Dell Avamar is its ability to take differential backups for users. This feature is very effective for both backup and restore operations. We've had multiple cases where we needed to restore files directly from Avamar, and it worked perfectly. The Delta feature, which captures changes in user files, is particularly useful."

"We sell Avamar with Data Domain. Data Domain and Avamar work really well together and their compression ratios are very high compared to Veeam, Commvault, and all the other backup software on the market."

"We have seen huge data reduction and data deduplication and compression, which is very cost-effective and cost-reducing for the company."

"Easy to configure and highly reliable for backup."

"The most valuable feature for me in Dell Avamar is the automation, which is good for completion."

More Dell Avamar pros

Cons

"And hearing about all these awesome posibilities, it kind of struck me that this was only possible with NetApp storage."

"Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix."

"The solution could improve by having better integration and more flexibility."

"The support is very bad."

"The solution used to freeze sometimes while taking a snapshot backup."

"The technical support should be improved. They could be more responsive in the future."

"Avamar is dependent on the hardware. It can't be implemented with ordinary storage."

"It's an expensive solution."

"Stability has improved since we first started using it, but it still has a ways to go."

"The UI is a complete mess; it is graphic, but it might as well be a CLI considering how difficult it is to work with."

More Dell Avamar cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It was very expensive before, but after integrating it with Dell EMC Avamar Data Protection suite licensing, we are getting better discounts."

"The solution is expensive."

"Dell Avamar is free when we deploy the data protection. When we order data protection, this software is included in the hardware."

"I rate the tool's price as a three out of ten if one means expensive and ten means it is a cheaply priced tool."

"Licensing fees are paid annually."

"Its licensing is weird. It is not just the licenses; we also purchase hardware. With most software products, such as Veeam, Commvault, and Data Protector, there is no hardware purchase at the same time. Because Avamar and Data Domain are tied together, they have an integrated pipe. You can separate them, but basically, they're designed to work as a couple. Because the Data Domain backend is designed to do dedupe and compression, we get 60:1. When you count it, you count it as a straight compression, but of course, that's with dedupe and some other stuff. You have to buy the hardware, the licensing, and the software at the same time. So, it's not just software."

"The price is the main thing I'd like to see them change. If they can come down in price, that would be a good thing. It's very cost competitive in the entry level range, because Veeam pricing is much cheaper than Avamar."

"Regarding pricing, I would say Avamar is slightly expensive compared to its functionalities. It's not high-priced or low-priced but somewhere in between."

More Dell Avamar pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What's the difference between Dell EMC Avamar and Dell EMC NetWorker?

From the very beginning, Dell EMC NetWorker considers users and those who might potentially become users. In terms of both pricing and setup, this product offers an experience that is significantly...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC Avamar?

The cost is very significant, and it could be lower.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell Avamar?

It is a very good product. My only concern is that there is no tape backup. For tape backup, we have to use Dell NetWorker. They could add more features for cyber resilience and multi-cloud options...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 8% of the time

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 7% of the time

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 5% of the time

More Catalogic DPX Competitors

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Dell Avamar

Compared 28% of the time

Rubrik vs Dell Avamar

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell Avamar

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Dell Avamar

Compared 3% of the time

Dell NetWorker vs Dell Avamar

Compared 3% of the time

More Dell Avamar Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

September 2026

Download Catalogic DPX product report

Buyer's Guide

Dell Avamar

October 2026

Download Dell Avamar product report

Also Known As

BEX

Avamar

Overview

Catalogic DPX offers a robust data protection solution aimed at optimizing backup and recovery processes with efficiency and reliability. Designed to cater to complex IT environments, it ensures seamless data management and protection capabilities.

Intended for enterprises seeking comprehensive data protection, Catalogic DPX delivers advanced features for backup, recovery, and management of data across multiple platforms. The capacity to integrate seamlessly with current systems enhances its functionality, providing users with flexible, scalable solutions that accommodate dynamic business needs. This adaptability is critical in maintaining data integrity and agility in complex IT frameworks.

What are the most important features of Catalogic DPX?

Backup and Restore: Provides fast, reliable backup and restoration options.
Snapshot Management: Integrates with storage arrays for instant access to snapshots.
Replication: Ensures data availability through efficient data replication technologies.
Deduplication: Reduces storage requirements through advanced deduplication techniques.
Ransomware Protection: Offers robust security measures against ransomware threats.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines backup processes, reducing time and labor.
Cost Savings: Minimizes expenses related to storage and recovery operations.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT demands without compromising performance.
Data Security: Ensures high standards of data protection across environments.

Businesses in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing implement Catalogic DPX to manage vast amounts of critical data with ease. Its deployment supports compliance with industry-specific regulations, ensuring secure and efficient data handling tailored to unique business requirements.

Catalogic

Dell Avamar offers advanced deduplication, efficient data compression, and high backup and recovery speed, enhancing backup management and operations optimization for virtual environments and data protection needs.

Known for its seamless integration with VMware, Dell Avamar provides a user-friendly interface and robust performance. Its centralized data handling and minimal bandwidth requirements make it effective for different backup scenarios. While Avamar efficiently supports virtual environments and provides broad protection capabilities, users often report challenges with the interface and backup speed. There can be complexities in training and management, and integration with cloud and external platforms can be troublesome. Additional complaints include high pricing, scalability issues, and challenging transitions that complicate data migration.

What are the standout features of Dell Avamar?

Advanced Deduplication: Significantly reduces data size.
Efficient Data Compression: Optimizes storage use.
High Backup and Recovery Speed: Enhances operational efficiency.
VMware Integration: Facilitates smooth virtual environment operations.
Centralized Data Management: Simplifies data handling.

What benefits and ROI should users seek?

Improved Backup Management: Streamlines processes and enhances efficiency.
Optimal Storage Usage: Through data deduplication and compression.
Reliable Disaster Recovery: Ensures business continuity and data security.
Enhanced Cyber Resilience: Protects against data loss and security threats.
Scalable Operations: Grows with business needs while reducing overhead.

In industries focusing on virtual machine protections, Dell Avamar is widely used for VMware environments, endpoint, server, and database backups. Often integrated with Dell Data Domain for storage efficiency, it supports diverse environments, including remote office backups. Companies also leverage Avamar for compliance with geographical data retention regulations, adapting for on-premises and cloud deployments.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

Hendrick Medical, CommonFund, Red-8, Fairfax County Schools, Tectrade, Storage Assessments

Dodge County, St Laurence's College, FieldCore (a GE Company), Comanche County Memorial Hospital, Getronics, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Cincinnati Bell Technology Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.