No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Carbonite vs CubeBackup Google Workspace comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite
Ranking in SaaS Backup
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CubeBackup Google Workspace
Ranking in SaaS Backup
38th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the SaaS Backup category, the mindshare of Carbonite is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CubeBackup Google Workspace is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SaaS Backup Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Carbonite0.6%
CubeBackup Google Workspace0.9%
Other98.5%
SaaS Backup
 

Featured Reviews

Rias Majeed - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Exceed NetSec LLC
Reliable high availability with seamless synchronization
If customers say, 'I want the server to be running 27/7/365 without any fail,' then we say this is your high availability option, not the backup. I am clear on that. If you are looking for backup, I suggest other product lines that take folder backups. I use another backup solution with that one, so you have this option. The main concern with other product lines is DC change, meaning it goes to the first head office failover server, then to the remote failover server. If the head office failover server fails, the Doctor server will not have an update. That is the area of concern, as more than eighty percent of the product lines do head AC chaining. I used to ask for direct synchronization. That is where Carbonite plays a role, allowing direct synchronization or replication to one or multiple Doctor sites. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
TH
Consult at Consulting
We prefer it to a local workstation but is expensive
I prefer CubeBackup to a local workstation and then to an offline unit. This way, I have two backup locations. The backups are incremental, starting Monday and continuing through the week, with backups from Monday, Tuesday, and the following days, including additional backups in the middle of the…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SaaS Backup solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Carbonite?
The reverse failover process takes a long time, especially with physical servers, often requiring 48 hours without any surprises. For more granular restores, Carbonite is not the right product, as ...
What is your primary use case for Carbonite?
I utilize Carbonite within my organization for high availability purposes, especially for critical servers where downtime is not acceptable. When a primary server fails, Carbonite permits a quick f...
What advice do you have for others considering Carbonite?
If customers say, 'I want the server to be running 27/7/365 without any fail,' then we say this is your high availability option, not the backup. I am clear on that. If you are looking for backup, ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Barracuda Networks, Commvault and others in SaaS Backup. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.