We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and VMware Carbon Black Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."
"The most valuable features are its lightweight design, ensuring minimal impact on end-users, and its real-time protection."
"The market information they gather from the community is really good. Their configuration capabilities are good."
"The detection response and quarantining are very good features."
"We are able to remotely isolate exploited endpoints in seconds and perform a live deep dive of any endpoint into its running processes (as necessary) without the need for extra scripts."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to seek out abnormal activity and to create alerts."
"Setting up and managing the setup for this solution is okay. It is stable, scalable, and it runs just fine. No issues with technical support."
"Probably the most valuable feature of CB Response is its ability to isolate a host and take it off the network, so it's not spreading anything. We have two security operations centers around the globe. When an SOC analyst sees something on an endpoint, they can use Carbon Black Response to isolate that host from the customer's environment and prevent any kind of lateral spread."
"The enhanced logging and data analysis of the incident response and investigation components allowed us to quickly identify and resolve security issues before they could spread."
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."
"The product detects too many false positives initially and it could integrate better with other security solutions."
"The solution can only handle about 500 bans or blocks."
"It's not highly available, so you have to have a core server. If the primary server goes down, you need a new one. It's not available at the same time, however. It's not automatically swapped from one server to another."
"The cloud console has a lot of bugs and issues in the analysis part."
"Additionally, it is complex to use, and the pricing should be improved."
"They need to improve the batch console. It needs more capabilities. We are limited by the ones it provides..."
"The dashboard should be more user-friendly."
"The support team of Carbon Black CB Response needs improvement. At present, they need a lot of information. Then they give you an answer that they already gave you. You tell them it didn't work, and then they take a long time."
Earn 20 points
Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 11th in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 18 reviews. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Cloud writes " Shows promise for endpoint detection and response, with room for improvement in complexity and pricing ". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas VMware Carbon Black Cloud is most compared with VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, Fidelis Elevate, Splunk SOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
