CA Unified Communications Monitor vs NinjaOne comparison

Broadcom and NinjaOne are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #104, while NinjaOne is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.7. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to NinjaOne’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of NinjaOne users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

202 Views
81 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

NinjaOne

Read 18 NinjaOne reviews

601 Views
273 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

NinjaOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and NinjaOne compete in the IT management space. NinjaOne has the upper hand due to its robust features and technical capabilities, making it a more compelling choice despite CA Unified Communications Monitor's pricing advantages.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers network performance monitoring with tools for real-time analysis, diagnostics, and alerting. NinjaOne provides a comprehensive IT management suite, including endpoint management, patching, and system automation, catering to modern IT needs.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could benefit from enhanced integration with third-party tools, improved user interface, and more streamlined update processes. NinjaOne might improve by expanding its reporting features, adding more customization options, and offering more detailed analytics for users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor relies on traditional deployment models that can require longer setup times and more in-house expertise. NinjaOne offers a cloud-based deployment model for faster implementation and scaling. NinjaOne's customer service is noted for quick response times and proactive support, offering an advantage over CA Unified Communications Monitor.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor positions itself as a cost-effective option with lower initial setup costs. NinjaOne, although requiring a higher initial investment, provides better ROI through enhanced endpoint management and automation, resulting in long-term operational savings.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NinjaOne Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NinjaOne

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

104th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (76th)

NinjaOne

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (9th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (9th), Remote Access (20th), Vulnerability Management (26th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (6th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (11th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), Patch Management (8th), MSP Backup (3rd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NinjaOne is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Jörg Köhler

Owner at AvalisNT AG

Enhances remote access and integration with third-party tools

I use NinjaOne for managing smaller clients, specifically their devices and software, for small to medium businesses. I provide remote management services through NinjaOne. It allows clients to use NinjaOne for remote access to their computers for home office purposes. This feature is highly…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."

"The solution's most valuable feature is related to its remote access...I know that NinjaOne's technical support is good."

"We can use it for remote monitoring, and it also works great as a troubleshooting tool. We are able to open up a command line or a PowerShell session remotely without having to disrupt the user. They have a limited network device monitoring capability, but for workstation servers, we have the event logs. We can do performance monitoring, system changes, software deployment, and patch management. We can also push scripts. It has a very simple web interface. There are no additional things to do there. Security is also pretty good. It does the same things that the other competitor's tools do. One of the advantages of Ninja is that they have a more capable mobile app, which allows you to see the alerts immediately. I get alerted to major critical issues."

"NinjaOne's best feature is its monitoring."

"The policies are probably the most valuable features. They're similar in function to Microsoft group policies where we can have it monitor certain things or push out software on a schedule. I would rate the policies eight out of 10. They're robust, I could monitor most of the things that Windows Performance Monitoring keeps tabs on."

"NinjaOne has a feature where we can create custom scripts that we can run on devices remotely."

"It just works as advertised and serves the purpose for which we got it."

"A significant feature of NinjaOne is its remote access capability, which is essential for my clients’ home office usage."

More NinjaOne pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The ticketing system in NinjaOne is not the best."

"The remote connectivity could be better. It works most of the time, but sometimes, there are issues."

"I would like to see the software reduced to focus on inventory or remote help tools since many of its current functionalities are not needed."

"NinjaOne's pricing and user interface needs improvement."

"Improvements could be made to reduce NinjaOne's functionalities to focus more on inventory or remote help tools."

"The inclusion of XENServer and Proxmox as virtual platforms in NinjaOne is currently missing."

"The reporting is lackluster. NinjaOne is great for maintaining systems, but it's hard to use it to understand the state that systems are in without going in and mining the information myself. I rate the reporting two out of 10."

"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."

More NinjaOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is reasonable and cheaper than ConnectWise."

"NinjaRMM uses a subscription model."

"Its pricing is great."

"NinjaOne is a little expensive but is still cheaper than competitors like Acronis or Veeam."

"NinjaOne's price is fine since my workplace is an educational institution, so we get the product at a really good price considering that we do not pay taxes, making the prices very fair and worth the product."

"We currently pay $1.20 per device on a monthly basis."

"I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

"It roughly costs $400 a month. It provides a good value because of the number of tools that you get in the solution. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about NinjaOne?

NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

The price or licensing of NinjaOne is a little bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

The network monitoring needs to be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Kaseya VSA vs NinjaOne

Compared 10% of the time

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 8% of the time

Atera vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs NinjaOne

Compared 6% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

May 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne

June 2025

Download NinjaOne product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

NinjaOne automates the hardest parts of IT, delivering visibility, security, and control over all endpoints for more than 20,000 customers.The NinjaOne automated endpoint management platform is proven to increase productivity, reduce security risk, and lower costs for IT teams and managed service providers. The company seamlessly integrates with a wide range of IT and security technologies. NinjaOne is obsessed with customer success and provides free and unlimited onboarding, training, and support. - Learn more here: https://www.ninjaone.com/

NinjaOne

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NinjaOne

June 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NinjaOne

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NinjaOne and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NinjaOne report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.