Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs QuickBase comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Boomi Logo
521 views|426 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Quickbase Logo
2,588 views|1,272 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Flow and QuickBase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform.""Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure.""In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money.""The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."

More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Pros →

"It has superb ease of use and no code needed to create and build apps and databases.""It is low-code. We are able to go in and create apps quickly. It is very helpful for the size of our company. We're a mid-size company, and at this moment, we don't need anything externally. We don't have to go out and consult a consulting firm to build something from the ground up. So, the ease of that and being able to get development quickly up and running has been good for us.""Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment.""The product is easy to use.""We have made good use of the ability in QuickBase to add multiple apps for various departments and purposes, while some apps are shared.""I run my own business and the solution allows me to invoice and pay for additional resources. It has helped me in terms of invoicing, quoting, and doing recruitment measures.""I am impressed with the product's automation which makes everything easy.""It has helped streamline and simply track status and collection of data from suppliers and other internal departments."

More QuickBase Pros →

Cons
"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.""Its stability could be improved.""The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved.""The solution's user interface building needs improvement."

More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Cons →

"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work.""The dashboard is not organized.""They could enhance the ability to link records between tables directly without the need for additional automation to increase space and time.""I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate.""I would like the product to add more working processes.""It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities."". For example, we need a third-party to create and save a document in PDF, MS Word, or MS Excel format. The document saving capability is probably the feature that we most often have to procure from an outside provider.""Access to more standard default layouts and sample builds would be useful, and access to more training on use and flexibility."

More QuickBase Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "When you use Boomi AtomSphere Flow in production, you have to pay for licenses. The solution is not expensive but it could be cheaper."
  • "Since its pricing positioning has a different construction with respect to its competitors, the solution is sometimes way more expensive and sometimes less expensive."
  • More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."
  • "We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."
  • "Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."
  • "You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."
  • "It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."
  • "The product is cheap when compared to other products."
  • "The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."
  • "The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."
  • More QuickBase Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.
    Top Answer:Since its pricing positioning has a different construction with respect to its competitors, the solution is sometimes way more expensive and sometimes less expensive.
    Top Answer:We are an Italian company, and we see difficulty proposing products like Boomi AtomSphere Flow to the government due to its cloud nature. The solution's user interface building needs improvement.
    Top Answer:Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment.
    Top Answer:The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year. As for data volume, there is a different pricing model once you… more »
    Top Answer:Areas for improvement in QuickBase include incorporating certain formulas like VLOOKUP, commonly used in platforms like Excel. Additionally, they could enhance the ability to link records between… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    521
    Comparisons
    426
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    688
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    2,588
    Comparisons
    1,272
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    559
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Boomi Flow
    Quick Base, TSheets
    Learn More
    Overview

    Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.

    Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

    Sample Customers
    bioventus, AM Transport Services
    Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Construction Company18%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Logistics Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization69%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Insurance Company3%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business51%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise71%
    Large Enterprise22%
    Buyer's Guide
    Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. QuickBase
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Boomi AtomSphere Flow is ranked 19th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 4 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 13th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 73 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is rated 8.0, while QuickBase is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Flow writes "A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". Boomi AtomSphere Flow is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Pega BPM and Mendix, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Sales Creatio, Oracle Fusion Service, OutSystems and Mendix. See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. QuickBase report.

    See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.