Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs QuickBase comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines processes, reduces errors, improves productivity, and enhances integration, automation, data visibility, and decision-making.
Sentiment score
7.1
QuickBase delivers significant financial benefits by reducing costs, increasing productivity, improving efficiency, and enhancing business visibility.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow support is effective but inconsistent, with strong documentation aiding users in resolving issues independently.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase customer service excels in quick technical support with extensive resources, despite limited weekend support and occasional delays.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
associate director at Nagarro
I have not personally dealt with Boomi's customer support, but my team mentions that support is not good.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is effective and rated highly for scalability but requires manual adjustments for resource scaling.
Sentiment score
7.7
QuickBase is highly scalable, efficiently managing growth in users and data, with strong support for expanding applications.
In terms of scalability, the tool is quite scalable, and I would rate it eight or nine.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
associate director at Nagarro
Quick Base has high potential to scale.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is stable and efficient for moderate use but struggles with heavy data loads and API integration bugs.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase is stable with minor disruptions, rated highly by users for reliability and timely maintenance communication.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
associate director at Nagarro
 

Room For Improvement

Boomi AtomSphere Flow needs user-friendliness, stability, AI enhancements, better support, and flexibility for complex integrations and large datasets.
QuickBase requires better customization, UI, mobile experience, improved reporting, integrations, security, formulas, training, APIs, and cost management.
It lacks features like the ESQL scripting language found in IBM's, which makes integration transformations easy.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
associate director at Nagarro
The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Boomi AtomSphere Flow's pricing is seen as reasonable, especially for small-scale operations, with ratings averaging 6.5-7/10.
Enterprise buyers appreciate QuickBase's flexible pricing, but costs rise with users; negotiating tailored solutions is advised for large enterprises.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
associate director at Nagarro
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Pricing could be cheaper.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines integration with a low-code interface, boosting scalability, security, and efficiency across diverse systems.
QuickBase provides code-free app creation, customization, and efficient data management, enhancing operational efficiency with PaaS capabilities and API integrations.
We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
associate director at Nagarro
This provides a unified solution without needing different databases or pipelines.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
22nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (31st)
QuickBase
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (18th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 2.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
QuickBase2.1%
Boomi AtomSphere Flow1.4%
Other96.5%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

KG
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
We manage app integrations effectively and identify areas for more flexibility
Boomi AtomSphere Flow gives us flexibility. Even though our integration requirements are not complex, ranging from simple to medium, Boomi fulfills all our integration needs. We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
RS
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Empowers content management and application creation without SQL
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for improvement in front-end functionalities. I cannot deploy and use front-end features anywhere; they must be deployed inside Quick Base. The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub. Additionally, their APIs have limitations, such as reliance on XML for backend APIs, which restricts their utility.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Educational Organization
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Non Profit
6%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
7%
University
7%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...
What is your primary use case for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
We are working with Cooke Aquaculture, and we use Boomi AtomSphere Flow ( /products/boomi-atomsphere-flow-reviews ) for integration processes. It is specifically used for application-to-application...
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Boomi Flow
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.