Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BMC AMI DevX vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management comparison

BMC and IBM are both solutions in the Software Configuration Management category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.7, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 6.3. BMC holds a 22.0% mindshare in SCM, compared to IBM’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 64% of IBM users who would recommend it.
BMC AMI DevX
Read 19 BMC AMI DevX reviews
  • 4,088 Views
  • 1,145 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Read 17 IBM Engineering Workflow Management reviews
  • 1,182 Views
  • 177 Comparison Views
64% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2025

IBM Engineering Workflow Management and BMC AMI DevX enhance software development processes. IBM excels in flexibility and extensibility, while BMC is superior in mainframe support and advanced DevOps features.

Features: IBM Engineering Workflow Management includes robust task management, real-time collaboration, and integration with IBM tools. BMC AMI DevX offers debugging, code analysis, and strong mainframe support.

Room for Improvement: IBM could improve user interface intuitiveness, enhance mobile support, and streamline installation. BMC DevX may focus on increasing cloud features, reducing complexity, and improving integration with non-mainframe tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM offers a modern deployment model with extensive resources and support. BMC provides tailored deployment options and dedicated customer support for mainframe contexts.

Pricing and ROI: IBM has competitive pricing with rapid ROI due to integration and workflow optimization. BMC, while higher in setup cost, offers substantial ROI for mainframe-dependent organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Software Configuration Management Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Software Configuration Management
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Debugging (8th), Database Development and Management (20th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (7th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (8th)
IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
3rd
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 22.0%, down from 31.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 4.5%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Configuration Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BMC AMI DevX22.0%
IBM Engineering Workflow Management4.5%
Other73.5%
Software Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

Brian Westerman - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to make mainframe data management process easier and saves manhours
We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates.
Read full review
Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We can develop in parallel today on ISPF, but it's giving us the advantage of the newer interface into the mainframe programming languages that younger programmers can use and are familiar with, rather than using the ISPF green screen."
"I have worked with DB2's great features in the last five years. The IDAA feature transformed the vision of warehousing, business analytics, and big data at my bank. Besides the mainframe, I saw that this solution was evolutionary. It gives real-time information."
"The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is beneficial in application development."
"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."
"It helps our staff work by speeding up their documentation process."
"It does our CICS NEWCOPYs and our Db2 binds for us, whereas before, that was a manual process. It takes a lot of the workload off of the operations folks and off the DBAs."
"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"
"The visual ability to see potential downstream impacts to changes being made assists our developers in understanding the impact associated with their change."
More BMC AMI DevX pros
"The tool provides traceability and reporting, which are important for compliance and measuring progress."
"We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data."
"It was an all-in-one solution for source code, integrated source control, defect tracking, and project planning."
"Good for managing stories, sprints, hydration and releases."
"Traceability reporting is inbuilt and includes all your requirements."
"The most valuable features of the solution are highly customizable reports and visibility for all the higher management."
"All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security."
"Agile templates give us a standard methodology for every Agile project. Also, the ability to create our own object types and linkages to features/epics allows us to enhance the verification of feature readiness."
More IBM Engineering Workflow Management pros
 

Cons

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."
"The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment."
"When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?"
"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."
"DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."
"We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates."
"It's a very complicated tool."
"I'm always looking for improvement in things like the documentation, to make things a little bit easier and simpler to understand, a place where people can go to troubleshoot issues."
More BMC AMI DevX cons
"We have encountered issues with stability. We have seen where the entire system kind of goes for a toss when certain people use certain types of queries, which are very costly. Then the system kind of slows down a bit, and we have to monitor it."
"Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans."
"The solution is very heavily vendor dependent."
"Lacks ability to customize and reporting can be slow."
"I would rate the IBM Engineering Workflow Management a seven or an eight. I am leaning closer to seven based on a couple of items I mentioned that I would like to see or know more about, such as improved reporting."
"It's becoming less relevant. For example, Maven has evolved, and in its later versions, there are plugins for integrating with source control systems, such as Git-based systems. Support for these plugins is diminishing."
"Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial."
"Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified."
More IBM Engineering Workflow Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price point is great."
"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."
"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."
"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."
"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."
"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."
"I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools."
"It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. The cost per token is around $115-$120."
"Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition."
"It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
37%
Insurance Company
12%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Compuware File-AID?
The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Compuware File-AID?
We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Compuware File-AID?
We use the solution clone test files.
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 33% of the time
IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 16% of the time
IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 10% of the time
InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 10% of the time
Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 2% of the time
More BMC AMI DevX Competitors
Jira vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Jira vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 42% of the time
Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 12% of the time
Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 9% of the time
GitLab vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
GitLab vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 6% of the time
IBM Rational ClearCase vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
IBM Rational ClearCase vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 5% of the time
More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Test Data Management
August 2025
BMC AMI DevX reportDownload BMC AMI DevX product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
August 2025
IBM Engineering Workflow Management reportDownload IBM Engineering Workflow Management product report
 

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline
IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
 

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?
  • Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
  • Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
  • Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
  • Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
  • Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
  • Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
  • Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
  • Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom
Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Buyer's Guide
Software Configuration Management
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, IBM and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.