BlazeMeter and Qualibrate compete in software testing and optimization. BlazeMeter has the upper hand due to its flexible pricing and extensive support, whereas Qualibrate's robust features justify its cost for certain deployments.
Features: BlazeMeter provides performance testing tools that integrate with CI/CD pipelines, enabling automated, scalable load tests. It includes comprehensive cloud-based testing and open-source tool integration like JMeter for a seamless workflow. Qualibrate stands out with its capabilities in test automation and documentation, ease of creating test process documentation, and intuitive user interface.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could enhance its interface to improve accessibility for non-technical users and optimize its integration with third-party applications. It may also benefit from reducing the learning curve for beginners. Qualibrate's room for improvement includes expanding its range of supported platforms, increasing the flexibility of its deployment options, and enhancing customer support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter uses a cloud-based deployment model that is easy and flexible, backed by structured support and a large community. Qualibrate uses a hybrid deployment model supporting both on-premise and cloud setups, beneficial for organizations with specific compliance requirements. BlazeMeter benefits from a larger user community, providing extended customer service opportunities.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter is considered cost-effective with scalable pricing models suited to different enterprise needs. Qualibrate may involve higher initial costs but can offer substantial ROI by streamlining test management and reducing time and resource expenditure. Both tools provide significant long-term operational efficiencies that can justify their costs.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
