BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs IBM Rational System Architect comparison

BiZZdesign and IBM are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. BiZZdesign is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while IBM is ranked #19. BiZZdesign holds a 4.9% mindshare in AM, compared to IBM’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of BiZZdesign users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Read 17 BiZZdesign HoriZZon reviews

2,102 Views
952 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

IBM Rational System Architect

Read 5 IBM Rational System Architect reviews

883 Views
479 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

IBM Rational System Architect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

IBM Rational System Architect and BiZZdesign HoriZZon are key players in the enterprise architecture domain. BiZZdesign HoriZZon has the upper hand due to its modern design and flexibility, making it a compelling choice.

Features: IBM Rational System Architect offers strong modeling capabilities and extensive integration options, beneficial for managing complex system architectures. Meanwhile, BiZZdesign HoriZZon is valued for its intuitive design, advanced analytics, and flexible frameworks, suitable for enhancing decision-making and process efficiency.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational System Architect could improve by enhancing its user interface for a smoother learning curve and developing more agile deployment options. BiZZdesign HoriZZon might focus on expanding its modeling languages and further streamlining its import/export capabilities for better integration, along with enhancing broader industry-standard compliance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides cloud-based deployment with efficient onboarding and comprehensive customer support, enabling rapid implementation. In contrast, IBM Rational System Architect often requires more intensive setup and technical guidance due to its on-premise focus.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational System Architect demands higher upfront costs, leading to a longer ROI period due to its complexity. BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers competitive prices with potentially quicker ROI, facilitated by scalable subscription models and efficient resource utilization.

To learn more, read our detailed BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. IBM Rational System Architect Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. IBM Rational System Architect

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

6th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (11th)

IBM Rational System Architect

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

19th

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 4.9%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational System Architect is 1.7%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

BijoyTalukder

Enterprise Architect at Tata Consultancy

Helps to get a clear overview of our enterprise architecture, especially when dealing with multiple departments

One area where BiZZdesign HoriZZon could use some improvement is in its REST APIs. While the platform offers REST APIs, they have limitations when it comes to retrieving and exporting data. Obtaining detailed information at the individual application or component level, including IDs, costs, and deployment-related data, can be challenging through these APIs. This limitation makes it difficult to smoothly export such granular data. I have raised this issue with the BiZZdesign team, and they expressed interest in addressing it, but I'm not aware of the current status of this improvement effort. Nonetheless, improving the usability and flexibility of the REST APIs for data extraction is an area that could enhance the platform's capabilities.

Read full review

it_user951237

Enterprise Architecture Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Modeling is useful, but many features need improvement and technical support is lacking

I find that almost every feature related to the models requires improvement. For example, I would like to see more trendy models, the look and feel of the models can be improved. This solution can be more user-friendly and easier to use, with better dashboards. The impact analysis feature is in need of heavy improvement. The is a standalone product that lacks integration with a business process automation engine. I would like to see the workflow improved, where it integrates seamlessly with the artifacts.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that it allows you to work with different methods, using the same tool."

"The most valuable features are the application, portfolio, data, architectures, and modeling things."

"The tool's most valuable feature is that its collaboration part is very good."

"t's a good tool. My colleagues that are making use of it for application, business processes, or data modeling, are very satisfied with it. They find it easy to use. The graphical representation is simple but therefore efficient, so I know that they are planning a very good commencement on the use of these tools."

"BiZZdesign HoriZZon is scalable, and I'd give it an eight out of ten for scalability. Our customers are enterprise level companies, but the solution is suitable for small and mid-sized companies as well."

"The powerful editing function in teamwork project-based, common or shared modeling, based on a powerful repository and knowledge sharing in a portal are the most valuable features. These are the most important features for me. I can add the integration of individual modeling notations like Archimate plus BPMN and DMN, and so on. We travel from one location to another and the tool allows us to keep track."

"Among the valuable features is the ability to document standards. For example, we have mandatory operating standards that need to be followed by every application and every architecture. We use things like table charts and pie charts for documenting the costs incurred across the systems. All of these are good features."

"The initial setup of this solution was very straightforward."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros

"The solution is pretty stable."

"The user interface is good. It's both clear and comprehensible. It's easy to work with."

"We have seen ROI with this solution over the years that we have used it."

"There are a lot of features I find valuable, but I think that the metamodel customization is one of the best features that the solution offers."

Cons

"In HoriZZon, there are different matrices. In some of the cases, there is an option to aggregate them, but in other cases, we have not done this, e.g., to see the proper costs. For example, if I have 10 different matrices, then I need to create an aggregate view out of those 10 matrices somewhere. That is where we have been struggling a bit. We have a counterpart from the HoriZZon product team with whom we have bi-weekly discussions. We have suggested to him that this can be improved."

"It lacks capabilities with regard to infrastructure modeling."

"There could be simpler modelling."

"It should be more open to integrating with other existing tools. Although there has been progress in the past."

"The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult."

"The automatic data collection and interface need improvement."

"Integration definitely needs improvement. There are some restrictions. We've seen that it doesn't integrate with everything we might expect."

"There's room for improvement. When I finished using it over a year ago, I discussed implementing C4 notation with BiZZdesign HoriZZon.They've likely done this now, but I haven't seen it. Setting up interactive views for stakeholders to score services was a bit difficult."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons

"There needs to be more information at the outset about how to use the solution and how to deploy it. The deployment process needs improvement."

"The reverse engineering of the database is already there, but in the next release I would like to see some pilot supplied with the solution in order to address any database."

"The solution needs to better integrate with other products, like Microsoft."

"This solution can be more user-friendly and easier to use, with better dashboards."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."

"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."

"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."

"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."

"The price is reasonable."

"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."

"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."

"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

25%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult. We don't use the chart functionality much, and I think that is quite problematic at the moment. We have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

I use the solution in my company for all sorts of things, like enterprise and solution architecture. As part of our design process, BiZZdesign HoriZZon is used for road mapping. We also use it for ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 17% of the time

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 10% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 9% of the time

ARIS BPA vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 9% of the time

Visio vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 8% of the time

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs IBM Rational System Architect

Compared 75% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs IBM Rational System Architect

Compared 14% of the time

ARIS BPA vs IBM Rational System Architect

Compared 11% of the time

More IBM Rational System Architect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

April 2025

Download BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

March 2025

Download IBM Rational System Architect product report

Also Known As

HoriZZon

Rational System Architect

Overview

Make smarter decisions and optimize outcomes by unifying all your strategy, capabilities, operating models and change portfolios in a single platform.

With all the data about your business in one place you can see the big picture and make properly informed strategic decisions to drive growth. Bizzdesign Horizzon brings together strategy, IT architecture, operating models, data, capabilities, change portfolios and ideas into a single, intuitive collaborative business design platform. Real-time visibility of key metrics and trends allows you to take action more quickly. Accelerating the speed and accuracy of your operations now – and into the future.

Core Platform Capabilities:

Multi-discipline collaboration
Data Integration
Advanced analytics
Models and Roadmaps
Governance & Security
Business Insight Graph

BiZZdesign

IBM Rational System Architect is an enterprise architecture solution for visualizing, analyzing, and communicating enterprise architecture and business process analysis. This solution provides decision support, process optimization, and integration into solution delivery. Rational System Architect addresses all aspects of your organization's enterprise architecture, including modeling, publishing, analysis, and execution.

IBM

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance

Wuxi Lake Cloud, Nationwide, ETI, IDS Scheer

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. IBM Rational System Architect

April 2025

Free Report: BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. IBM Rational System Architect

Find out what your peers are saying about BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. IBM Rational System Architect and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. IBM Rational System Architect report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.