Avolution ABACUS vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon comparison

Avolution and BiZZdesign are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Avolution is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while BiZZdesign is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. Avolution holds a 3.1% mindshare in AM, compared to BiZZdesign’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Avolution users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of BiZZdesign users who would recommend it.

Avolution ABACUS

Read 15 Avolution ABACUS reviews

2,455 Views
2,234 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Read 19 BiZZdesign HoriZZon reviews

3,973 Views
2,781 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Avolution ABACUS

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Avolution ABACUS and BiZZdesign HoriZZon compete in the enterprise architecture tools category. BiZZdesign HoriZZon holds the upper hand with its robust feature set and positive organizational impact, despite Avolution ABACUS's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Avolution ABACUS offers dynamic modeling, customization, and real-time collaboration, making it suitable for adaptable architectural needs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides advanced integration capabilities, strategic analytics, and visualization tools, excelling in strategic planning and holistic enterprise strategy.

Room for Improvement: Avolution ABACUS could enhance integration capabilities, expand its visualization toolkit, and improve strategic insights. BiZZdesign HoriZZon might benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing costs, and expanding customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avolution ABACUS offers straightforward deployment and reliable support, easing onboarding for users. In contrast, BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides flexible, cloud-based deployment and proactive customer service, catering to organizations seeking agility and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Avolution ABACUS presents a cost-effective solution with competitive pricing and lower initial setup costs, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. BiZZdesign HoriZZon, though priced higher, offers a greater ROI through enhanced strategic insights and long-term value for enterprises seeking comprehensive strategic benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avolution ABACUS

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Avolution ABACUS is 3.1%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 4.7%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BiZZdesign HoriZZon	4.7%
Avolution ABACUS	3.1%
Other	92.2%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

JoseCamacho

Freelancer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Supports evaluating architecture through corporate objectives

I conducted an evaluation of enterprise architecture at the European Court in Luxembourg, reviewing and analyzing existing implementations to identify potential improvements and providing recommendations I conduct evaluations to identify potential improvements and make recommendations, forming a…

Read full review

Maamoun Hasuneh

Chief Enterprise Architect at EVC

Architecture repository has strengthened data‑driven decisions and supported risk‑aware planning

BiZZdesign HoriZZon needs to publish its integration scenarios and integration points with other digital transformation tools such as IT service management, risk management, asset management, customer service, and ERP. The company should first build the scenario and define its integration points in business and technology to make customers more confident about having a complete solution. Currently, there is a challenge with the company to offer transparent and documented integration. They offer five integration points at a fixed price, but other things come at additional costs. However, specific information about what those additional items are, what the scenarios entail, what the schemas are, what the workflows include, and what the application integration involves is not provided. The learning portal does not include integration documentation at a high level or in detail. The portal does have comprehensive resources explaining how to make their website, how to create dashboards, and how to publish EA content, which are clear. The high-end tool on the laptop is also explained in detail, covering elements, relations, and everything as standard.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Avolution ABACUS is very easy."

"The most valuable feature is that it has a customizable meta-model, which is key."

"It is a great tool for helping you understand what you really want to develop in an immature EA practice, providing a lot of flexibility in meeting a client stage and serving as an excellent early development tool."

"The tool's implementation is straightforward as everything is readily available. For instance, setting up a portal is seamless, allowing easy publishing and access to data. However, integrating with other tools like BI, Power BI, or Grafana requires setting up pipelines between them."

"The ease of modeling and the ease of showing interconnectivity and relationships is the most valuable. It is fairly simple and out of the box. It is customizable in many ways. It is a pretty good tool."

"It is a very powerful tool that does what an enterprise architect needs it to do and it supports the business in knowing more about the business so that they can do better."

"For what it does it is very good and a reasonable price."

"I would recommend it very strongly."

More Avolution ABACUS pros

"The feature I find most valuable is that the start times and loading times are short. It takes only a few seconds to load the repository and whenever I want to open diagrams, they are there almost immediately."

"The tool's most valuable feature is that its collaboration part is very good."

"We can derive some meaningful insights from whatever data that we have, which is the main thing."

"Among the valuable features is the ability to document standards. For example, we have mandatory operating standards that need to be followed by every application and every architecture. We use things like table charts and pie charts for documenting the costs incurred across the systems. All of these are good features."

"The most valuable features of BiZZdesign HoriZZon include the diagrammatic representation of BPMN models, which I find good for modeling, and things such as capability maps."

"I used BiZZdesign HoriZZon at two organizations. At Manchester Metropolitan University, I used it with a small team for architectural modeling of the student record system. We modeled teams, process objects, and their interactions with applications. We also used it to model a gradual rollout with plateaus showing migration over time. At the BBC, I used it to model software services for publishing content online. I showed key model views to senior stakeholders using Horizon, allowing them to modify and score applications and services."

"This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool."

"BiZZdesign HoriZZon's visualization techniques help my clients make data-driven decisions."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros

Cons

"I use reference models, which are taxonomies, in my EA work. It is a reference model/taxonomy of things with capabilities, sub capabilities, and sub-sub capabilities, so you're working it down. I haven't yet found a simple way to implement that in Abacus. It could be that it is there, but I don't know how to do it."

"The most valuable features are the catalog and the diagram."

"Avolution ABACUS has the drawback of needing data filtering at the development level, unlike some tools that offer filtering at deployment. Two areas where Avolution ABACUS could be improved are regional support and flexibility in model selection. Sometimes, it's challenging to access support or updates in certain regions, which can slow down progress. Additionally, it would be beneficial if the tool allowed more flexibility in selecting multiple models within a single unit."

"The tool doesn't have any intelligence built in. We have to design the dashboards ourselves, which is a challenge because we have to depend on the vendor for customizations."

"This solution needs to improve resource usage because it has a heavy browser. It is easy to use, but it takes time to load and to run other programs."

"In the future, there could be improvements in integration and enhancements."

"While Avolution ABACUS is flexible, it can be complex to work with as it requires knowledge of specific configurations to customize the product."

"The company needs to update the UML version they are using for the product as it is quite old."

More Avolution ABACUS cons

"BiZZdesign HoriZZon's technical support has presented challenges, as extra fees are required and the process is not straightforward."

"The repository of duplicate objects is bad."

"It should be more open to integrating with other existing tools. Although there has been progress in the past."

"The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult."

"There could be simpler modelling."

"The visibility of things and the user experience in HoriZZon are horrible."

"There's room for improvement. When I finished using it over a year ago, I discussed implementing C4 notation with BiZZdesign HoriZZon.They've likely done this now, but I haven't seen it. Setting up interactive views for stakeholders to score services was a bit difficult."

"It takes a long time to learn and understand, which is a learning curve you have to go through, but once you know how it works, it's very nice to work with."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is not an issue."

"My company makes annual payments toward the licensing costs of the solution. Considering the product's capabilities, its prices are very reasonable."

"To get a fairly extensive license for Enterprise Architects from Spark is approximately US $400.00, maybe less, but with Avolution Abacus it was approximately US $2000.00 per year, and that includes maintenance with the Abacus tool."

"I'm paying on a yearly basis. I don't know whether it's a highly expensive tool or not. I'm getting a single version of it, and I don't have the enterprise part on it because I don't need the server component, and I don't need a web browser component. My estimate would be that it's a very reasonably priced tool given that you don't need to have licenses with everyone in order to get the information and the decision support capabilities out of the tool. You use the enterprise edition on top of the studio, which is the heart of the tool. I am not aware of any additional costs."

"It is competitive. It is not chump change. I am just using the studio version. I am not using the full enterprise version, which would probably cost me three times more for single-use, but it gives a lot more capability and analysis. It is server-based as well, and it is reasonably priced compared to a lot of the other tools. There are other tools that have other sorts of capabilities, but in order to use them, you'd really have to have like 50 users for the price to become justifiable."

"The pricing is quite good compared to the competition and it is part of the reason we chose the product."

"This solution is expensive for some people's budgets and they need to offer a Lite version at a cheaper price"

More Avolution ABACUS pricing and cost advice

"The price is reasonable."

"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."

"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."

"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."

"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."

"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."

"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."

"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Avolution ABACUS?

While Avolution ABACUS is flexible, it can be complex to work with as it requires knowledge of specific configurations to customize the product. It would be beneficial to have seminars or other met...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Avolution ABACUS?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Avolution ABACUS?

I rate Avolution ABACUS eight out of ten. The focus should be on implementing and understanding enterprise architecture concepts rather than the specific tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

BiZZdesign could improve BiZZdesign HoriZZon in several areas. There are potential areas of improvement that should be addressed to make the product better.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

BiZZdesign HoriZZon is primarily used for enterprise architecture processes. My clients mostly use it for architecture modeling and planning.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

I last worked with BiZZdesign HoriZZon recently. BiZZdesign HoriZZon is deployed on Amazon Web Services. I was not involved in the purchase process, as it is totally on the client side. I would rat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 19% of the time

LeanIX vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 12% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 10% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 6% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 6% of the time

More Avolution ABACUS Competitors

iServer vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 12% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 10% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 8% of the time

LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 7% of the time

ARIS Cloud vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 4% of the time

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS

June 2026

Download Avolution ABACUS product report

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

June 2026

Download BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report

Also Known As

No data available

HoriZZon

Overview

Avolution ABACUS provides comprehensive enterprise architecture modeling with customizable features, facilitating effective planning and analysis for businesses seeking advanced integration and analytical capabilities.

Avolution ABACUS stands out in enterprise architecture with its rich feature set including customizable meta-models and 3D modeling. It offers role-based permissions, robust integration capabilities, and is well-regarded for its traceability and dynamic customization. Users benefit from impact analysis, support for multiple frameworks, and its capacity to support corporate objectives and IT infrastructure. A user-friendly dashboard, application testing, and extensive modeling capabilities enable professionals to create strategic roadmaps, although improvements are needed in UI complexity and flexible reporting.

What are the main features of Avolution ABACUS?

Customizable Meta-Models: Allows users to tailor features to specific business requirements.
3D Modeling: Enhances visualization of architectures.
Role-Based Permissions: Facilitates secure collaboration.
Integration Capabilities: Supports seamless interaction with various frameworks.
Impact Analysis: Aids in understanding changes and their potential effects.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Traceability: Facilitates tracking of architectural components.
Effective Cataloging: Organizes data comprehensively for easy access.
Dynamic Customization: Adapts features to specific needs effortlessly.
Analytical and Simulation Tools: Provides insights for effective decision-making.
Predefined Components: Accelerates the modeling process.

Industries such as banking utilize Avolution ABACUS for application domain architecture, benefiting from its comprehensive diagram and model designing abilities. Consultants demonstrate this to clients, showcasing potentials like identifying capability overlaps and standards. On-premises deployments allow organizations to access, evaluate, and develop within established environments, aiding in effective architectural planning and analysis.

Avolution

BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers robust enterprise architecture modeling, seamless collaboration, and supports ArchiMate standards, benefiting organizations with efficient integration capabilities, intuitive features, and stakeholder accessibility.

BiZZdesign HoriZZon facilitates enterprise architecture through its strong modeling features in Enterprise Studio, providing collaborative dashboards and integration with systems like ServiceNow and SQL databases. Known for quick loading times and diagrammatic representation, it supports multiple modeling languages while maintaining an intuitive web interface. Despite its strengths, organizations find challenges with interface complexity, high costs, a steep learning curve, and scalability in large datasets.

What are the key features of BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

Modeling in Enterprise Studio: Enables comprehensive architecture and process modeling.
Collaborative Dashboards: Promotes teamwork with shared perspectives.
ArchiMate Standards: Ensures compliance and consistency in modeling frameworks.
Integration Options: Seamlessly connects with ServiceNow and SQL databases.
Repository Management: Centralizes data for efficient governance.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved Decision Making: Facilitates informed choices through clear architecture representation.
Process Optimization: Streamlines operations leveraging capability mapping.
Accessibility for Stakeholders: Simplifies architectural insights for all involved parties.
Enhanced Governance: Supports enterprise-wide oversight and documentation management.

BiZZdesign HoriZZon serves industries focused on enterprise architecture, aiding in project governance and application portfolio management. Organizations in sectors like finance, manufacturing, and IT leverage it to align architectural elements with business goals, centralize architecture data, and optimize processes for better decision-making and oversight.

BiZZdesign

Sample Customers

Barclays

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

June 2026

Free Report: Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Find out what your peers are saying about Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.