No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Bitdefender Security for AWS vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Bitdefender Security for AWS optimizes efficiency, reduces costs, and enhances threat detection, improving ROI through streamlined security management.
Sentiment score
6.9
Organizations report financial and operational benefits from Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, including improved security, automation, and cost reduction.
There is also an improvement in threat detection accuracy, with a twenty-five to forty percent enhancement due to machine learning and behavioral detection.
Security Practitioner at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
It improved the operational efficiency, reduced the administrative workload, and streamlined the security management.
Lecturer, Department of Agricultural Finance and Management at Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
Bitdefender Security for AWS has saved the team significant time by automating threat detection, malware scanning, and security policy enforcement.
Cloud Technical Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Without detection and protection measures, organizations would face substantial payments and reputational damage, including the necessity to inform customers about data breaches, potentially leading to loss of business.
Consultant at ACT4SERVICES
We have seen a return on investment when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it saves labor by reducing the need for staff to focus on it.
IT CONSULTANT at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
The biggest return on investment for me when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is the time saving.
Lead security engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Bitdefender Security for AWS offers responsive support, effective troubleshooting, and generally positive user experiences despite minor configuration issues.
Sentiment score
6.3
Microsoft support is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, but varies in quality; documentation and complex issue resolution need improvement.
I would rate customer support for Bitdefender Security for AWS a nine out of ten.
Security Practitioner at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The support team provides practical guidance during the deployment, configuration, and troubleshooting activities.
Lecturer, Department of Agricultural Finance and Management at Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
They always give immediate acknowledgment and also try to resolve it very quickly.
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Kyndryl
The Microsoft agent, who did not actually work for Microsoft, is one of the vendors that Microsoft uses for support, said, 'Just to set expectations, my lunch break is in an hour and I am going to go away then.'
Security Analyst III at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The level-one support seems disconnected from subject matter experts.
Office 365 Subject Expert at a government with 10,001+ employees
I rate Microsoft support 10 out of 10.
Team manager of it department at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Bitdefender Security for AWS automates scalable protection, optimizes costs, and efficiently manages EC2 fleets for all environments.
Sentiment score
7.4
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is scalable, seamlessly accommodating large environments with flexible deployment and integration with Microsoft's ecosystem.
Regarding scalability, it's AWS, so you can scale easily.
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Kyndryl
Regarding scalability, as my AWS environment grows, new workloads can be protected quickly without requiring significant administrative effort.
Lecturer, Department of Agricultural Finance and Management at Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
When new EC2 instances are deployed through auto-scaling or our infrastructure expands, they can be protected using the same centralized policies and management framework.
Cloud Technical Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
We managed to scale it out in a short amount of time, with two months of planning and three months of implementation on 10,000 computers.
Team manager of it department at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is scalable enough to handle various devices across environments, whether they are laptops, Android devices, or operating in hybrid environments.
Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra
Compatibility is its main feature.
IT CONSULTANT at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Bitdefender Security for AWS is stable, lightweight, integrates well with EC2, and minimizes CPU impact, ensuring reliable protection.
Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is reliable and efficient, with minor update issues, praised for integration and performance.
The security policies remain consistent and the solution operates reliably during day-to-day cloud operations.
Lecturer, Department of Agricultural Finance and Management at Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
Bitdefender Security for AWS has been stable and reliable in my experience.
Cloud Technical Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
In my experience, Bitdefender Security for AWS is stable.
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Kyndryl
I haven't seen any outages with Microsoft.
IT Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
I rate Defender 10 out of 10 for stability.
Team manager of it department at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Defender for Endpoint is extremely stable.
Systems engineers at Delta Dental of Colorado
 

Room For Improvement

Bitdefender Security for AWS seeks better AWS integration, intuitive UI, agentless deployment, enhanced dashboards, and improved alert filtering.
Microsoft Defender users seek better AI integration, customer support, UI, security, customization, visibility, threat response, and simpler pricing.
Bitdefender Security for AWS should add CNAPP capabilities including CSPM, infrastructure as code scanning, and container security.
Security Practitioner at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
You need careful planning and tuning with policy tuning.
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Kyndryl
I need broader support for containerized and serverless workloads, deeper integration with AWS native security and monitoring services, as well as expanded cloud posture management capabilities.
Lecturer, Department of Agricultural Finance and Management at Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
Repeated interactions are necessary due to Level One's lack of tools and knowledge, hindering efficient problem-solving and negatively impacting our experience with Microsoft support.
Office 365 Subject Expert at a government with 10,001+ employees
In contrast, competing products offer reduced pricing for long-term commitments, which makes it difficult for us in that environment.
Solution Consultant at BIM Group of Companies
We use Microsoft partners to help govern the platform, and as part of an alliance, we want to gather data from each tenant and combine them for a complete view.
Team manager of it department at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Bitdefender Security for AWS provides cost-effective, usage-based pricing and easy integration with AWS finance workflows for antimalware protection.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers flexible licensing, integrating with Microsoft 365, providing cost-effective, feature-rich enterprise security solutions.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Bitdefender Security for AWS is that it is very cheap compared to others such as Symantec.
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Kyndryl
The licensing model is straightforward and scalable, making it easier to align the cost with the number of protected workloads.
Cloud Technical Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, the experience has been very good as we were able to unify billing with AWS.
Analista de Infraestrutura de TI at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
That has been the trend we have seen with Microsoft lately—it is just getting more and more expensive.
Assistant Director, Hybrid Infrastructure & Operations at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
Given our extensive Microsoft licensing, transitioning to Defender for Endpoint did not affect licensing costs.
Team manager of it department at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
It costs $15 per VM for the P2 plan, which is seen as affordable for customers.
Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra
 

Valuable Features

Bitdefender for AWS offers advanced malware protection, seamless integration, efficient security, and agile operations with pay-as-you-grow licensing.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers seamless integration and advanced threat protection with centralized management and low resource usage for enterprises.
The best features that Bitdefender Security for AWS offers include an advanced anti-malware solution, behavioral detection, a lightweight agent, scan offloading, and low performance impact.
Security Practitioner at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Efficient malware detection and workload protection.
Lecturer, Department of Agricultural Finance and Management at Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
Regarding Bitdefender Security for AWS's AI capabilities, the security and governance are strong as it has SOC 2 compliance and many other compliances including PCI DSS and ISO 27001, which benefit all workloads such as financial and healthcare.
Sr.Devops engineer at Scaler
Defender for Endpoint's coverage across different platforms in our environment is pretty good. We have devices running Linux, Mac OS, Windows, iOS, and Android. It covers all of them.
Team manager of it department at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a unified management interface allowing customers to manage their on-premises and hybrid infrastructures from a single pane.
Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra
One of the best features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is its database for identifying zero-day attacks or malware attacks.
Consultant at ACT4SERVICES
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender Security for AWS
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Defender for Endp...
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
212
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (1st), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (3rd), Microsoft Security Suite (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Bitdefender Security for AWS is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is 6.3%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Anti-Malware Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint6.3%
Bitdefender Security for AWS1.1%
Other92.6%
Anti-Malware Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Abhimanyu Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Kyndryl
Bitdefender Security for AWS is a cloud‑native antimalware and workload‑protection service that secures EC2 instances on AWS with minimal performance impact via off‑loaded scanning and centralized man
Bitdefender Security for AWS could be improved by broadening its scope beyond basic antimalware on EC2 and adding features that better match how modern cloud workloads are built and run. Right now it’s focused on lightweight, off‑loaded scanning for EC2 instances, which is strong, but there are a few obvious gaps that customers often mention indirectly. From a feature‑roadmap perspective, the most useful additions would probably be deeper cloud‑native workload support, such as antimalware‑style protection or integrity checks for containers (ECS/EKS pods) and serverless components like Lambda, not just traditional EC2 VMs. Many teams today mix EC2 with containers and serverless, so being able to manage at least policy and visibility across those layers from the same GravityZone‑style console would make the product feel more comprehensive. Another area to improve is integration with AWS security and observability services: tighter bridging to GuardDuty, Security Hub, and CloudTrail so that Bitdefender detections and scan events can flow directly into native AWS tools instead of relying only on GravityZone or a separate SIEM. This would reduce duplication, simplify alert routing, and help teams enforce consistent security‑and‑compliance rules across the board. Technically, it would also help if the product added lighter agent‑less or partially agent‑less options for scanning or integrity‑checking data and snapshots, similar to how some cloud‑security platforms inspect EBS volumes or backups without requiring a long‑running agent on every instance. This would appeal to teams that want antimalware‑style coverage but minimize the number of agents or services running on critical workloads. Finally, better cloud‑security posture and configuration insights (think basic CSPM‑style checks) around the EC2 and VPC environment would push the product closer to a full‑stack cloud‑security tool, rather than a dedicated antimalware layer. Customers already using GravityZone and XDR would likely appreciate seeing misconfigurations, risky IAM patterns, or open‑to‑the‑Internet instances flagged alongside the traditional malware‑detection view.
Robert Arbuckle - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Analyst III at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Automatically isolates threats and integrates with logging to reduce response time
Overall, I would evaluate the Microsoft support level that I receive at probably about a seven, but that depends on the day. It has been spotty. We have had issues where the urgency level of the Microsoft support is not as high as ours, especially during a data breach or potential data breach situation. We have had issues with some of the offshore support being lackluster. One specific thing that comes to mind is we were on a support call with our CISO on the call, and the Microsoft agent, who did not actually work for Microsoft, is one of the vendors that Microsoft uses for support, said, "Just to set expectations, my lunch break is in an hour and I am going to go away then." For us, it was already ten o'clock at night and we had been working on this for a couple of hours, trying to get a security engineer on with us. For him to tell us that he was going to go away and have lunch, it was, "Okay, but go find somebody else if you need to." It was just the lackluster approach, and it seemed like he did not really care. We seem to get a lot of this when we get non-Microsoft support. I can identify areas for improvement with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it is kind of a convoluted mess to try to take care of false positives. Especially when they have been identified as false positives but they keep going off over and over again. It is great for my pocketbook because it generates a lot of on-call action, but I would really prefer more sleep at two o'clock in the morning than dealing with false positives. I would say that the unified portal for managing Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is suitable for both teams as they are all in there. It would be great if they would stop moving things around and renaming things, which makes sense. The new XDR portal is pretty nice. Being able to have it central again inside of the regular Security Center without having to open up two windows is helpful. Overall, I think it is pretty good. There is always going to be something that could be improved, such as alerting and the ability to modify alerts would be a little bit helpful to have. Being able to add more data into the alerts and turn off alerts that are not as useful would be beneficial. It is hard to say what the quantitative impact the security exposure management feature has had on our company's security, because a lot of it is kind of subjective. I think we are sitting at around a fifty percent score still, and a lot of it is just kind of unusual circumstances that we cannot really implement without breaking the organization.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
13%
Construction Company
8%
University
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business82
Midsize Enterprise45
Large Enterprise96
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender Security for AWS?
My experience with the pricing, implementation costs, and licenses of Bitdefender Security for AWS has been accessible.
What needs improvement with Bitdefender Security for AWS?
I found the platform easy to use, but there are always areas to improve. One thing I would like to see is even more customizable dashboards and reporting, so different teams can quickly focus on th...
What advice do you have for others considering Bitdefender Security for AWS?
I recommend clearly defining security requirements before deployment and taking time to plan policies for AWS integration. Start with a pilot deployment in a test environment. Overall, I had a posi...
How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...
How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?
The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Defender ATP, Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection, MS Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender Antivirus
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe
Petrofrac, Metro CSG, Christus Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Security for AWS vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.