Bitbar vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

SmartBear and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #28, while Progress Software is ranked #24. SmartBear holds a 1.3% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Bitbar

Read 3 Bitbar reviews

760 Views
570 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,219 Views
744 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitbar

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Bitbar and Telerik Test Studio compete in the testing solutions market. Telerik Test Studio generally has the upper hand due to a more comprehensive feature set, while Bitbar is recognized for its accommodating pricing strategy and effective customer support.

Features: Bitbar offers cloud-based testing capabilities, scalability, and compatibility with numerous devices. Telerik Test Studio provides robust integration capabilities, intuitive automation tools, and extensive reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbar provides flexible cloud deployment with quick setup and effective customer service. Telerik Test Studio offers structured deployment with comprehensive documentation and training resources, providing a streamlined experience.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbar is noted for competitive pricing with scalable subscription plans and strong ROI potential. Telerik Test Studio, although at a higher cost, provides a rich feature set that ensures high ROI through enhanced testing efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbar vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bitbar vs. Telerik Test Studio

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbar

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

28th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Platforms (10th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Bitbar is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Telerik Test Studio	1.4%
Bitbar	1.3%
Other	97.3%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1288116

Head of Digital & Cognitive Services at a tech company with 11-50 employees

A testing platform with a good API for apps, but pricing is complicated

I like that the AI Testbot is a near-zero code application for testing. For this use case, the function is good. The services are robust. Game testing and the API for apps are also good. From the perspective of pricing, licensing, ease of use, integration with other applications, impact complexity, and integration with other tools, we're pretty much very satisfied.

Read full review

Chirag N M

Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Supports multiple platforms and identifies elements in a good way

Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code would be reusable. You won't have to change your test cases much. We wrote our code in a separate IDE, which was Visual Studio, and internally, we had the infrastructure to interact with Telerik Test Studio. All the internal logic that we needed for our purpose was implemented in .NET, and we used Telerik Test Studio for tests. I'd rate Telerik Test Studio an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Game testing and the API for apps are good."

"Ability to use different frameworks."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

Cons

"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."

"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs Bitbar

Compared 18% of the time

BrowserStack vs Bitbar

Compared 17% of the time

LambdaTest vs Bitbar

Compared 13% of the time

IBM MobileFirst vs Bitbar

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs Bitbar

Compared 10% of the time

More Bitbar Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Platforms

January 2026

Download Bitbar product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

December 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

Testdroid

No data available

Overview

Testdroid is a set of mobile software development and testing products by Bitbar Technologies Limited. Testdroid comprises three different products: Testdroid Cloud, Testdroid Recorder and Testdroid Enterprise. Testdroid provides an application programming interface through open source software available on GitHub. Testdroid can use testing frameworks, such as Robotium, Appium and uiautomator for native and Selenium for web applications, targeted for mobile application and game developers. Testdroid Cloud contains real Android and iOS powered devices, some of which are available for users. Testdroid Cloud lets users run tests simultaneously on cloud-based service. Testdroid Recorder is a tool for developers and testers for recording user-actions and producing JUnit based test cases on mobile application and games. Testdroid Recorder is available at the Eclipse marketplace. Testdroid Enterprise is a server software for managing automated testing on multiple real Android and iOS powered devices, supporting Gradle build system and Jenkins Continuous Integration.

SmartBear

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Bitbar vs. Telerik Test Studio

January 2026

Free Report: Bitbar vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbar vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitbar vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.