We performed a comparison between Bitbar and IBM MobileFirst based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Apple, Temenos and others in Mobile App Platforms."Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"IBM MobileFirst has one of the most feature-rich admin panels."
"I like Its capability for developing hybrid applications, with an ability to integrate device-native code as well"
"With help of this product, we have been able to develop mobile applications without having complete knowledge of each mobile OS's native programming technology. App development, delivery, and code management have been very efficient using this product."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"There are issues with push notifications, especially for Windows mobile apps. JSONStore also crashes abruptly at times."
"I would like to see improved support for native device functions."
Bitbar is ranked 17th in Mobile App Platforms while IBM MobileFirst is ranked 7th in Mobile App Platforms. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while IBM MobileFirst is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM MobileFirst writes "It provides access management for the enterprise user as well as for the consumer". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, CrossBrowserTesting, Sauce Labs and LambdaTest, whereas IBM MobileFirst is most compared with IBM MaaS360, Ionic, SAP Mobile Platform and Microsoft Azure App Service.
See our list of best Mobile App Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile App Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.