We performed a comparison between BigID and Collibra Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."BigID integrates well with our other products."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the user experience, the credentialing, and that BigID is user friendly. Additionally, you can deploy to several other Microsoft platforms and you can use it for other things, like a bigger element or a report."
"BigID's scanning feature is its most valuable component."
"One of the most valuable things in a data-focused world is a tool, a technology that's data-centric, not trying to master data management or whatever else. It's a source of truth for what data an organization holds, giving it the ability to catalog, categorize, and understand its data."
"It helps us build a powerful workflow mechanism where there can be any stewardship, including issue management governing assets using policies, regulations, or business rules."
"The diagram showing the limits is absolutely magnificent."
"The automation process is very strong."
"It enables a linear view of the data assets across different levels, providing a comprehensive understanding."
"The solution's technical support is helpful and responsive."
"From the perspective of a data user, the solution has a great search capability."
"The beauty of the solution is that you can customize it quite a bit."
"Workflow is very helpful and assessment are good features. I really like the structure of this solution and how it is compartmentalized."
"BigID is making some forays into the GRC space, and that's a natural progression. I'd like to see that improve so that data governance is better, data risk is identified, and the ability to control and mitigate it."
"BigID is expensive. I prefer McAfee."
"In terms of what could be improved, when you're looking in a BigID file, you cannot really get the whole file. You have to export it to download it to another platform that allows you to completely view it, or run a program. That was one of the things that was really a disappointing point for me. Not to be able to view everything. There's a lot more data, but you can't get it all at once."
"The tool currently lacks security features."
"It would be better if there was a way to import all data and metadata in an automatic way in one block form."
"The price of Collibra Governance could improve."
"We would like to have out-of-the-box automation."
"The connectors for metadata ingestion need to be improved."
"Recently, I find that the default process of issue management in Collibra is really complex — It wasn't really helpful to us."
"The interface is not very user-friendly and can be difficult to navigate."
"The connectors are not very sophisticated. They can do, for example, Informatica and Tableau, but the connectors themselves could be improved."
"There are a lot of gaps in Collibra's support and documentation."
BigID is ranked 7th in Data Governance with 4 reviews while Collibra Governance is ranked 2nd in Data Governance with 41 reviews. BigID is rated 8.4, while Collibra Governance is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of BigID writes "Commendable and robust data-centric tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Collibra Governance writes "Transformed our cross-functional business teams into one enterprise-facing view". BigID is most compared with Varonis Platform, Microsoft Purview, Cyera , OneTrust DataGovernance and Alation Data Catalog, whereas Collibra Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Alation Data Catalog, Informatica Axon, Ataccama ONE Platform and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest. See our BigID vs. Collibra Governance report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.