Basis Testimony [EOL] vs OpenText Functional Testing comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Basis Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of Basis Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Basis Testimony [EOL]

Read 1 Basis Testimony [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 98 OpenText Functional Testing reviews

19,772 Views
9,293 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Basis Testimony [EOL]

OpenText Functional Testing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing and Basis Testimony EOL compete in the automated testing solutions domain. OpenText Functional Testing has an advantage in ease of deployment and customer service, while Basis Testimony EOL is preferred for its superior features.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing is recognized for its integrated testing environment, supporting multiple scripting languages, and robust test automation. Basis Testimony EOL stands out with advanced test management capabilities, strong tool integrations, and innovative feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing offers a straightforward deployment process with reliable customer support for quick technical issue resolution. Basis Testimony EOL has a complex setup that can delay deployment, and while customer support is available, OpenText's support is more responsive.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing involves a higher initial setup cost but ensures consistent ROI through its reliability and comprehensive support. Basis Testimony EOL has a lower setup cost but may require additional investments in training and support, making the ROI dependent on users' ability to utilize its features.

To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Basis Testimony [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Functional Testing

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (4th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1474518

Security and Senior IT Projectmanager at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

User-friendly regression testing that is fast and offers good support

We have not yet explored this area in our testing. We plan to be ready for this phase next year. We are only doing a one or two-minute recording, next year it will be done for a year. Currently, I am the only user in our organization who is working with Basis Testimony. Once we have tested out the entire tool and we are satisfied, we plan to roll-out to the business for 10 to 20 users.

Read full review

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It takes less time to complete the regression testing; normally it will take three weeks and with this solution, we can shorten it to one week."

"It takes less time to complete the regression testing."

"It's allowed us to perform functional testing (to verify a specific action or function of code) for each product update."

"The solution’s AI capabilities cut down test creation time for mobile by at least 60 percent."

"The most valuable features are the API testing, the integration with DevOps and accessibility to people without a lot of technical skill."

"UFT is an expensive tool that can save you a lot of time and effort and provide great value for money if used correctly, but also turn out as ineffective related to value-for-money if used the wrong way."

"UFT is easy to use so the QA team is not required to have much programming skills."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."

"It's not only web-based but also for backend applications; you can also do the integration of the applications."

"UFT has improved our ability to regression test, freeing up the test team to work only on the new portions of the software without having to worry that they are introducing new errors in other areas without knowing it."

More OpenText Functional Testing pros

Cons

"The GUI and design could be improved."

"Cost is the biggest issue with UFT. It is not cheap."

"The application can be buggy at times and takes up a lot of memory on your PC."

"It needs to be able to be used on Chrome, Firefox, and other browsers on Macs and not just Safari. That's a very key requirement for my organization."

"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."

"There is a gap in technical support which is also part of our review. We've raised issues in the past, which have not been fixed in two years."

"Sometimes you need a little bit more, but then HP help us to find it as they're knowledgeable troubleshooters."

"The initial setup is complex."

"Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation)."

More OpenText Functional Testing cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"It's an expensive solution."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

"The price is reasonable."

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

More OpenText Functional Testing pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	74

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

Reducing the levels of support is something they could continue to improve. They tend to have an entry-level person that may not be as familiar with the product that fields the calls, which creates...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT One?

I'm more familiar with Functional Testing. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is a different product set that functions as an IDE for writing custom code. We don't leverage that pro...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 20% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 4% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Basis Testimony [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

October 2026

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

Overview

Information not available

Basis Technologies

OpenText Functional Testing is designed for ease of use, featuring strong object identification, AI capabilities, and multi-platform integration. Its VBScript simplicity and cross-browser, mobile support make it versatile for handling UI and API tests.

OpenText Functional Testing provides a seamless testing experience with powerful automation capabilities. Its integration with technologies like SAP and Oracle, combined with record and playback features, makes it a go-to tool for comprehensive testing environments. Users find value in its flexibility to streamline both UI and API tests. Challenges include high costs and resource usage, and there's a demand for broader programming language support and improved integration with CI/CD pipelines. Enhanced AI functionalities and better documentation are also requested.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Ease of Use: Simple scripting enhances the experience for testers.
Object Identification: Strong abilities ensure accurate testing.
AI Capabilities: Advanced AI features support testing automation.
Platform Integration: Compatible with SAP, Oracle and more.
Cross-Browser Testing and Mobile Support: Versatile testing across devices and browsers.

What benefits can users find in the reviews?

Automation Efficiency: Streamlines test executions saving time.
Versatility Across Technologies: Supports multiple platforms enhancing flexibility.
Scalability: Handles a wide range of testing requirements.
Improved Quality Assurance: Enhances the accuracy and reliability of tests.

OpenText Functional Testing is utilized in industries requiring robust testing frameworks like finance and healthcare. Companies automate web, desktop, and API applications, perform functional tests, and handle validations. Its adaptability to integration and broad technology support facilitates diverse testing needs.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.