Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs Kemp LoadMaster comparison

Barracuda Networks and Progress Software are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5. Barracuda Networks holds a 1.9% mindshare in ADC, compared to Progress Software’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Read 5 Barracuda Load Balancer ADC reviews

621 Views
602 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Kemp LoadMaster

Read 50 Kemp LoadMaster reviews

2,756 Views
2,425 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Kemp LoadMaster

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Kemp LoadMaster and Barracuda Load Balancer ADC compete in network load balancing. Kemp LoadMaster has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Barracuda Load Balancer ADC stands out with robust features.

Features: Kemp LoadMaster emphasizes high availability, comprehensive application delivery functions, and flexible deployment options. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is noted for advanced security features, including DDoS protection and web application firewall capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kemp LoadMaster is recognized for straightforward installation and responsive technical support. Barracuda's setup, while more complex, benefits from strong online resources and thorough documentation. Kemp provides hands-on support, whereas Barracuda focuses on self-service options.

Pricing and ROI: Kemp LoadMaster offers competitive pricing and attractive ROI, making it economical for businesses focused on affordability. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC, with higher initial costs, provides strong ROI through its extensive features and security enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kemp LoadMaster

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

9th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (20th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is 1.9%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster is 6.7%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kemp LoadMaster	6.7%
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC	1.9%
Other	91.4%

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

Moges Bekru

Network and Security Engineer at Malam Engineering PLC

Balances loads efficiently and saves costs but could improve initial setup

The typical use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC involves managing and distributing network traffic efficiently to maintain system performance. Clients use Barracuda Load Balancer ADC for its ability to handle and balance loads across servers I have seen improvements in Barracuda Load…

Read full review

IshtiaqKhalil

Information Security Engineer at BOK

Displays flexible, user-friendly interface with minor licensing challenges

The product could be improved with a more intuitive interface for complex configurations and more advanced analytics. Additionally, enhanced security features, like a more robust Web Application Firewall, and stronger APIs for better automation would be beneficial. Overall, the main areas for improvement are in strengthening the advanced features to better meet the demands of large-scale enterprise environments. key features for the next release should focus on three areas. First, an enhanced, next-generation security suite with a more powerful Web Application Firewall (WAF) and integrated bot protection. Second, more advanced and customizable analytics dashboards to provide deeper insights into application performance. Finally, greater support for modern, cloud-native environments, including better APIs for automation and seamless hybrid-cloud traffic management

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful features in Barracuda Load Balancer are its security capabilities, load balancing efficiency, and scalability."

"Barracuda's technical support is good - whenever we have an issue, they immediately connect and resolve it."

"I would rate the stability of Barracuda Load Balancer as a ten out of ten; it has high stability."

"The solution is simple and powerful. I find the Barracuda Load Balancer ADC's load balancing function most valuable. It balances the traffic well. The security features, like the Web Application Firewall, are also very helpful."

"The price is very good, and it's not very expensive."

"The most valuable feature is the load balancing and allowing for high availability of our web services."

"Load-balancing is a great feature that is very easy to configure and it is always working fine."

"It helps with efficiency and reactivity, in case of assistance needs."

"The most valuable feature that I found is the load balancing feature, it is the core function of the product."

"It has greatly fortified the performance and uptime of our front-door email ingress, simplified and segmented mail routing, and reduced admin overhead for mail issue resolution and troubleshooting."

"I like that this is a Network Load Balancer that can be used practically with any application in the backend. They have how-to guides on how to set up Kemp NLB with Exchange, but you can use it as well for Sharepoint, RDS, or any other back end server."

"Persistence is very valuable. This holds the connection information of the source and that connection is important to RDP and our APO calls. The connection has to be persisted to the original source to operate properly. We also use the subsections for sub-services to create services inside our services for our API resources, this is most awesome. We would not be able to do this without Kemp and offer this type of sub-service to route based on an API instance. It routes the traffic properly based on the sub-service type."

"The security features are the most valuable features of this solution."

More Kemp LoadMaster pros

Cons

"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."

"Load Balancer ADC is competitively priced, but it's not feature-rich, and its technology is not that advanced."

"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."

"The Barracuda Load Balancer ADC could be improved with more customization features. For example, F5 uses iRules for custom configurations. I haven't found something similar in Barracuda yet. The load balancer and WAF's basic and common features are enough, but we need more customization options."

"The quality of the solution's performance could be improved."

"Several elements of the GUI need work. For example, if you have many content switches, it’s difficult to find the ones you need. And where is the search feature?"

"Although Kemp is very user-friendly, it lacks a more custom configuration."

"In my opinion, the layer seven loads balancing that we're mainly using for web servers, doesn't seem to pick up when there are issues at the application level."

"I definitely think that the WAF can be improved."

"Over the last several major versions, the GUI has remained virtually unchanged and still seems lacking."

"I want to have the ability to pull a particular server. The DevOps portion was challenging for me, like if I needed to redirect from one IP to another URL. I needed to look that up, and the knowledge base is not well organized. When I look for information about Kemp on the Internet, I don't find many articles or something like that."

"The configuration of the basic services is pretty straight forward but for more complex solutions, there needs to be better documentation or knowledge base articles."

"If I had to change something it would maybe be to have a little better reporting graphics that show more details in the reporting. It seems to be a little small in the graphic, and I'm not sure if possible but maybe a GUI page that one can use to monitor if any server goes down."

More Kemp LoadMaster cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Load Balancer ADC is cost-effective and is about half the price of F5."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."

"From a cost perspective, Kemp is very competitive and is not hard to justify by any means."

"The pricing is alright and we pay a monthly licensing fee"

"It has a very attractive ratio of price/performance."

"They have multiple tiers of licensing and you can upgrade it easily."

"I have control on the licensing and all the prices since I work for a partner."

"The product definitely provides what the organization needs and its cost is reasonable considering the value it brings."

"Nowadays, going with the virtual appliance is the easiest way and the cost is reasonable."

"At $2,500 USD, this is absolutely a fantastic buy for the money!"

More Kemp LoadMaster pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?

Pricing for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC can be a consideration. However, it offers good value with its cost-saving benefits and efficient operation, balancing the initial financial outlay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?

There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic. Also, more could be done to enhance the initial setup, as it can be c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kemp LoadMaster?

My primary advice is to carefully analyze your total cost of ownership (TCO) rather than just the initial purchase price. Kemp LoadMaster is highly competitive on price and often provides a much be...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kemp LoadMaster?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kemp LoadMaster?

Our primary use case was traffic load balancing and distribution. The solution was essential for managing all inbound client traffic, including HTTPS and DNS requests, by routing it through our fir...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 32% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 25% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 11% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 10% of the time

HAProxy vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 10% of the time

More Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Competitors

HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 16% of the time

NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 10% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 10% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 2% of the time

More Kemp LoadMaster Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

January 2026

Download Barracuda Load Balancer ADC product report

Buyer's Guide

Kemp LoadMaster

January 2026

Download Kemp LoadMaster product report

Also Known As

Barracuda Load Balancer

LoadMaster Load Balancer

Overview

Barracuda Load Balancer is ideal for organizations looking for a high-performance, yet cost-effective application delivery and security solution. With the broadest range of hardware and virtual models, Barracuda Load Balancer provides maximum flexibility for organizations looking to build highly secure and scalable application infrastructure, whether it's deployed on-premises or in the cloud.

Barracuda Networks

Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features.

Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Fenwal Blood Technologies

Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

December 2025

Free Report: Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.