Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs Kemp LoadMaster comparison

Barracuda Networks and Progress Software are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Barracuda Networks holds a 2.2% mindshare in ADC, compared to Progress Software’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Read 5 Barracuda Load Balancer ADC reviews
  • 830 Views
  • 805 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Kemp LoadMaster
Read 50 Kemp LoadMaster reviews
  • 3,150 Views
  • 2,709 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Kemp LoadMaster and Barracuda Load Balancer ADC compete in network load balancing. Kemp LoadMaster has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Barracuda Load Balancer ADC stands out with robust features.

Features: Kemp LoadMaster emphasizes high availability, comprehensive application delivery functions, and flexible deployment options. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is noted for advanced security features, including DDoS protection and web application firewall capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kemp LoadMaster is recognized for straightforward installation and responsive technical support. Barracuda's setup, while more complex, benefits from strong online resources and thorough documentation. Kemp provides hands-on support, whereas Barracuda focuses on self-service options.

Pricing and ROI: Kemp LoadMaster offers competitive pricing and attractive ROI, making it economical for businesses focused on affordability. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC, with higher initial costs, provides strong ROI through its extensive features and security enhancements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 883,896 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kemp LoadMaster
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
10th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (22nd), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is 2.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster is 6.8%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kemp LoadMaster6.8%
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC2.2%
Other91.0%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Moges Bekru
Network and Security Engineer at Malam Engineering PLC
Balances loads efficiently and saves costs but could improve initial setup
The typical use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC involves managing and distributing network traffic efficiently to maintain system performance. Clients use Barracuda Load Balancer ADC for its ability to handle and balance loads across servers I have seen improvements in Barracuda Load…
Read full review
IshtiaqKhalil - PeerSpot reviewer
IshtiaqKhalil
Information Security Engineer at BOK
Displays flexible, user-friendly interface with minor licensing challenges
The product could be improved with a more intuitive interface for complex configurations and more advanced analytics. Additionally, enhanced security features, like a more robust Web Application Firewall, and stronger APIs for better automation would be beneficial. Overall, the main areas for improvement are in strengthening the advanced features to better meet the demands of large-scale enterprise environments. key features for the next release should focus on three areas. First, an enhanced, next-generation security suite with a more powerful Web Application Firewall (WAF) and integrated bot protection. Second, more advanced and customizable analytics dashboards to provide deeper insights into application performance. Finally, greater support for modern, cloud-native environments, including better APIs for automation and seamless hybrid-cloud traffic management
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is simple and powerful. I find the Barracuda Load Balancer ADC's load balancing function most valuable. It balances the traffic well. The security features, like the Web Application Firewall, are also very helpful."
"The price is very good, and it's not very expensive."
"The most useful features in Barracuda Load Balancer are its security capabilities, load balancing efficiency, and scalability."
"I would rate the stability of Barracuda Load Balancer as a ten out of ten; it has high stability."
"Barracuda's technical support is good - whenever we have an issue, they immediately connect and resolve it."
"The DNS Load Balancer makes it so that I don't have to worry about site failures."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...The initial setup of Kemp LoadMaster is very simple."
"The most valuable features for us are the Load Balancing and Web Application Firewall, as we have a lot of web applications."
"The pricing of the solution is valuable."
"Great web balancing and remote access balancing."
"I like that this is a Network Load Balancer that can be used practically with any application in the backend. They have how-to guides on how to set up Kemp NLB with Exchange, but you can use it as well for Sharepoint, RDS, or any other back end server."
"Managing and maintaining multiple servers is done in a single place."
"The user interface is very easy to work with."
More Kemp LoadMaster pros
 

Cons

"Load Balancer ADC is competitively priced, but it's not feature-rich, and its technology is not that advanced."
"The Barracuda Load Balancer ADC could be improved with more customization features. For example, F5 uses iRules for custom configurations. I haven't found something similar in Barracuda yet. The load balancer and WAF's basic and common features are enough, but we need more customization options."
"The quality of the solution's performance could be improved."
"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."
"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."
"The GUI is rather technical and complex, so it could be improved by making it simpler and more user-friendly."
"I really don't like the way the logs are presented in the software."
"In the next release, they can introduce 360 views in the same dashboard to make it easier for users to view. The graphical information should be displayed on the dashboard."
"They need to improve the UI environment. Currently, it's hard to navigate and use product."
"The cost of the GEO upgrade is not cost-prohibitive but it's something that would be a nice add-in, out of the box."
"The only thing that I miss is that the TMG server was giving me live information about who is connected and what is the request about."
"Hardware version needs a dual power solution."
"I would like to see more automation and control of overactive and inactive resources. If I could schedule these around our updates then it would be all automated. I would like to set up an automated script to coincide with the scripts I use to update resources and servers."
More Kemp LoadMaster cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"Load Balancer ADC is cost-effective and is about half the price of F5."
"Pricing for the perpetual licensing was fair to us for the features and ease of use we received."
"Nowadays, going with the virtual appliance is the easiest way and the cost is reasonable."
"The pricing is alright and we pay a monthly licensing fee"
"This is a cost-efficient product."
"Download Kemp's VLM trial and take it for a test drive; you will be impressed."
"Currently, no cost is involved with a virtual load balancer. They have used open source. We did not pay for software. We paid for the expertise. We are only paying the consulting charges, which are very reasonable, that is, around a thousand dollars."
"At $2,500 USD, this is absolutely a fantastic buy for the money!"
"The costs for the Kemp Load Balancer solution are okay because, for a good product, you have to spend money."
More Kemp LoadMaster pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
883,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Media Company
10%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business24
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise16
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?
Pricing for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC can be a consideration. However, it offers good value with its cost-saving benefits and efficient operation, balancing the initial financial outlay.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?
There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic. Also, more could be done to enhance the initial setup, as it can be c...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?
The typical use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC involves managing and distributing network traffic efficiently to maintain system performance. Clients use Barracuda Load Balancer ADC for its a...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kemp LoadMaster?
My primary advice is to carefully analyze your total cost of ownership (TCO) rather than just the initial purchase price. Kemp LoadMaster is highly competitive on price and often provides a much be...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kemp LoadMaster?
The product could be improved with a more intuitive interface for complex configurations and more advanced analytics. Additionally, enhanced security features, like a more robust Web Application Fi...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Kemp LoadMaster?
Our primary use case was traffic load balancing and distribution. The solution was essential for managing all inbound client traffic, including HTTPS and DNS requests, by routing it through our fir...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Compared 21% of the time
NetScaler vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Logo
NetScaler vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Compared 19% of the time
Fortinet FortiADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Compared 13% of the time
VMWare Avi Load Balancer vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Logo
VMWare Avi Load Balancer vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Compared 13% of the time
HAProxy vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Logo
HAProxy vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Compared 11% of the time
More Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Competitors
HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster Logo
HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster
Compared 15% of the time
NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster Logo
NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster
Compared 14% of the time
Fortinet FortiADC vs Kemp LoadMaster Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs Kemp LoadMaster
Compared 9% of the time
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Kemp LoadMaster Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Kemp LoadMaster
Compared 9% of the time
Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs Kemp LoadMaster Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs Kemp LoadMaster
Compared 3% of the time
More Kemp LoadMaster Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
February 2026
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC reportDownload Barracuda Load Balancer ADC product report
Buyer's Guide
Kemp LoadMaster
February 2026
Kemp LoadMaster reportDownload Kemp LoadMaster product report
 

Also Known As

Barracuda Load Balancer
LoadMaster Load Balancer
 

Overview

Barracuda Load Balancer is ideal for organizations looking for a high-performance, yet cost-effective application delivery and security solution. With the broadest range of hardware and virtual models, Barracuda Load Balancer provides maximum flexibility for organizations looking to build highly secure and scalable application infrastructure, whether it's deployed on-premises or in the cloud.
Barracuda Networks

Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features. 

Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.

Progress Software
 

Sample Customers

Fenwal Blood Technologies
Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT€ Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster
March 2026
Free Report: Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
883,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.