Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs Kemp LoadMaster comparison

Barracuda Networks and Progress Software are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. Barracuda Networks holds a 1.4% mindshare in ADC, compared to Progress Software’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Read 5 Barracuda Load Balancer ADC reviews
  • 519 Views
  • 417 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Kemp LoadMaster
Read 49 Kemp LoadMaster reviews
  • 4,377 Views
  • 2,507 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Kemp LoadMaster and Barracuda Load Balancer ADC compete in network load balancing. Kemp LoadMaster has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Barracuda Load Balancer ADC stands out with robust features.

Features: Kemp LoadMaster emphasizes high availability, comprehensive application delivery functions, and flexible deployment options. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is noted for advanced security features, including DDoS protection and web application firewall capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kemp LoadMaster is recognized for straightforward installation and responsive technical support. Barracuda's setup, while more complex, benefits from strong online resources and thorough documentation. Kemp provides hands-on support, whereas Barracuda focuses on self-service options.

Pricing and ROI: Kemp LoadMaster offers competitive pricing and attractive ROI, making it economical for businesses focused on affordability. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC, with higher initial costs, provides strong ROI through its extensive features and security enhancements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kemp LoadMaster
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
8th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster is 7.6%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
 

Featured Reviews

Roni Wijaya - PeerSpot reviewer
A simple and powerful solution with WAF feature
The solution is simple and powerful. I find the Barracuda Load Balancer ADC's load balancing function most valuable. It balances the traffic well. The security features, like the Web Application Firewall, are also very helpful. I use the SSL offloading feature too. It's very helpful because it prevents overload. Our application runs on HTTP, but we upload HTTPS on the load balancer. This means there are no performance issues. I think it's very helpful.
Read full review
PeterForster - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly stable and scalable load-balancing software that offers great technical support
My company is really happy with Kemp LoadMaster as a product. My company is also happy with the support we receive from Kemp LoadMaster. I want Kemp LoadMaster to provide users with better reporting capabilities in relation to TCP packets. In general, the connections that are present in the system require improvement. Feature-wise, Kemp LoadMaster has everything that our company's customers require. Kemp LoadMaster also has features that have supported our company's past projects.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is simple and powerful. I find the Barracuda Load Balancer ADC's load balancing function most valuable. It balances the traffic well. The security features, like the Web Application Firewall, are also very helpful."
"The price is very good, and it's not very expensive."
"Barracuda's technical support is good - whenever we have an issue, they immediately connect and resolve it."
"I would rate the stability of Barracuda Load Balancer as a ten out of ten; it has high stability."
"The most useful features in Barracuda Load Balancer are its security capabilities, load balancing efficiency, and scalability."
"Security is considered the most effective feature in Kemp LoadMaster."
"The most valuable features for us are the Load Balancing and Web Application Firewall, as we have a lot of web applications."
"LoadMaster is easy to deploy and understand."
"The most valuable feature so far has been the high-availability options that allowed us to add an additional Kemp LoadMaster VLM virtual appliance into our VMware vSphere environment, to provide failover for our existing LoadMaster."
"The security features, load balancing, built-in templates, and the easy to implement virtual IPs are great."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...The initial setup of Kemp LoadMaster is very simple."
"We really like the performance of this solution."
"Mitigates content security policy issues."
More Kemp LoadMaster pros
 

Cons

"The Barracuda Load Balancer ADC could be improved with more customization features. For example, F5 uses iRules for custom configurations. I haven't found something similar in Barracuda yet. The load balancer and WAF's basic and common features are enough, but we need more customization options."
"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."
"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."
"The quality of the solution's performance could be improved."
"Load Balancer ADC is competitively priced, but it's not feature-rich, and its technology is not that advanced."
"If there is anything that needs to be updated, the GUI can get a refresh to make it look more like 2020, although it is just a cosmetic change."
"I want to have the ability to pull a particular server. The DevOps portion was challenging for me, like if I needed to redirect from one IP to another URL. I needed to look that up, and the knowledge base is not well organized. When I look for information about Kemp on the Internet, I don't find many articles or something like that."
"Some of the support documentation seems to make assumptions that the person installing or configuring is experienced with the product or concepts."
"When we go serverless, we may again have to revisit this because the configuration needs to be changed. With this change, we can run into a lot of other configurations that we haven't got into, which involve additional expenses. It would be challenging to convince management to buy at that price point. It would be a balancing act of justifying that expense and the value, that is, how it is going to save a bit of time and make our platform secure. It can have better configuration ability. A lot of iterations happen when we have multiple servers pointing to the same domain. If we do not orchestrate carefully, it gets into a loop, which takes away the precious time of the user who is trying to subscribe to a service. It takes a little longer time to realize services as well as web pages."
"The configuration of the basic services is pretty straight forward but for more complex solutions, there needs to be better documentation or knowledge base articles."
"It would be much easier to have the management interface directly integrate with the Kemp Support library, allowing you to choose the desired template from the online catalog to then directly download to the LoadMaster."
"The product could be improved by making the SSL Offloading easier."
"They were still in the process of development, and for example, we set it up in a cluster. So it was one logistical unit built out of two physical devices. And the expected behavior, which I know from other devices, will be formed into a logic cluster. It's that you configure one unit. Then you bring the second unit into this cluster with the already configured primary unit. So the secondary box pulls all the configured ones from its neighbor, does everything automatically, and then synchronizes with this primary neighbor. And then it works, like, one logical unit. And this didn't work with the Kemp's initially, where they caused a lot of issues when building up a cluster, so there were some specials on how to set this up. When we built or set them up for the first time and the months afterward with no new software releases, there were a couple of problems, but in the end, they worked fine. So, they developed a lot and learned from what they've responded to, what we responded to them, and what needs fixing."
More Kemp LoadMaster cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Load Balancer ADC is cost-effective and is about half the price of F5."
"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"It is well-priced and licensing is very flexible."
"The Kemp LoadMaster is a tremendous value."
"Less expensive than Citrix."
"Setup is easy, the cost is affordable, and the licensing is quick and simple."
"This product has good value and features for the money."
"The price is lower than other options."
"The pricing is alright and we pay a monthly licensing fee"
"At $2,500 USD, this is absolutely a fantastic buy for the money!"
More Kemp LoadMaster pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Retailer
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
57%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Government
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?
Pricing for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC can be a consideration. However, it offers good value with its cost-saving benefits and efficient operation, balancing the initial financial outlay.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?
There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic. Also, more could be done to enhance the initial setup, as it can be c...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?
The typical use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC involves managing and distributing network traffic efficiently to maintain system performance. Clients use Barracuda Load Balancer ADC for its a...
See all answers
What do you like most about Kemp LoadMaster?
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...The initial setup of Kemp LoadMaster is very simple.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kemp LoadMaster?
LoadMaster is cheaper than some other solutions. It has a perpetual license, so it's a one-time cost.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kemp LoadMaster?
There are some challenges with updates on certain models that don't have a few features. The support team often takes a lot of time to provide resolutions for issues. Also, I could see more capabil...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Logo
NetScaler vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Compared 31% of the time
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Compared 24% of the time
A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Logo
A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Compared 12% of the time
Fortinet FortiADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Compared 12% of the time
More Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Competitors
HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster Logo
HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster
Compared 19% of the time
NGINX Plus vs Kemp LoadMaster Logo
NGINX Plus vs Kemp LoadMaster
Compared 16% of the time
Fortinet FortiADC vs Kemp LoadMaster Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs Kemp LoadMaster
Compared 16% of the time
NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster Logo
NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster
Compared 10% of the time
More Kemp LoadMaster Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
April 2025
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC reportDownload Barracuda Load Balancer ADC product report
Buyer's Guide
Kemp LoadMaster
April 2025
Kemp LoadMaster reportDownload Kemp LoadMaster product report
 

Also Known As

Barracuda Load Balancer
LoadMaster Load Balancer
 

Overview

Barracuda Load Balancer is ideal for organizations looking for a high-performance, yet cost-effective application delivery and security solution. With the broadest range of hardware and virtual models, Barracuda Load Balancer provides maximum flexibility for organizations looking to build highly secure and scalable application infrastructure, whether it's deployed on-premises or in the cloud.
Barracuda Networks

Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features. 

Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.

Progress Software
 

Sample Customers

Fenwal Blood Technologies
Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT€ Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster
April 2025
Free Report: Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.