Barracuda Application Protection vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Barracuda Networks and Wallarm are both solutions in the API Security category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4, while Wallarm is ranked #14. Barracuda Networks holds a 2.1% mindshare in APIS, compared to Wallarm’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Barracuda Application Prote...

Read 8 Barracuda Application Protection reviews

521 Views
521 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

1,361 Views
558 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Barracuda Application Prote...

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Wallarm NG WAF and Barracuda Application Protection compete in the cybersecurity space, each offering advanced security features for web applications. Wallarm NG WAF is appreciated for its competitive pricing, while Barracuda Application Protection is recognized for its comprehensive feature set, potentially positioning it as a more complete solution worth the investment.

Features: Wallarm NG WAF is noted for its AI-driven threat detection, seamless cloud integration, and focus on AI capabilities. Barracuda Application Protection distinguishes itself with robust threat intelligence, comprehensive DDoS protection, and broad protection capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF provides straightforward deployment through a cloud-first approach, ensuring quick setup and integration with existing infrastructures. Barracuda Application Protection offers a more involved deployment process but is supported by extensive customer service options, enhancing the setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: Wallarm NG WAF is known for its cost-effective pricing model, delivering solid ROI by streamlining operations and reducing overhead. Barracuda Application Protection, though higher priced, justifies the investment with comprehensive security services, potentially providing long-term value, highlighting Wallarm as a budget-friendly choice while Barracuda may offer greater benefits due to its extensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Application Protection vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Application Protection vs. Wallarm NG WAF

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Application Prote...

Ranking in API Security

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in API Security

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda Application Protection is 2.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 3.9%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Barracuda Application Protection	2.1%
Wallarm NG WAF	3.9%
Other	94.0%

API Security

Featured Reviews

Salbu Kumar

Manager at Cyvogenix

Application protection has strengthened web security and reduces manual effort for critical services

One area where Barracuda Application Protection could be improved is reporting customization. The dashboards are useful, but more flexible executive-level and technical reporting options would help different teams. Another area is policy tuning for complex applications. While the platform is strong overall, some advanced environments need extra fine-tuning to reduce false positives or adapt custom rules. Deeper integrations with third-party CM and DevSecOps workflows would streamline operations further. Overall, it is a solid platform, but more customization and smoother advanced tuning would make it even better. A simpler onboarding experience for new administrators would be beneficial. The platform has many strong features, but teams without deep WAF experience may need time to become fully comfortable with advanced settings. More AI-driven recommendations for rule tuning, anomaly prioritization, and false positive reduction would help smaller teams operate more efficiently. Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses. Overall, the product is strong, but easier management and smarter automation would make it even more attractive.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization as it is used for multiple clients, and I am also backing up the Exchange servers, which frequently experience attacks in customer environments, allowing for quick restoration, even from yesterday or the day before yesterday."

"Barracuda Application Protection's best features are protecting APIs and defending against zero-day vulnerabilities."

"Barracuda Application Protection has been a solid and dependable solution for protecting public-facing applications."

"Barracuda Application Protection had a positive impact mainly in terms of improved visibility and better handling of automated attack traffic."

"Barracuda Application Protection has significantly improved security posture, reducing the attack surface using WAF plus API protection, automating threats with machine learning-based bot protections, providing zero-trust access to applications, and helping detect and mitigate threats in real-time, resulting in a 50 to 60% reduction in security incidents after deployment."

"Within the first six to seven months of deployment, I saw a 60% reduction in security incidents, incidents affecting the web application which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."

"Within the first six months of deployment, we have seen a 60% reduction in security incidents affecting the web application, which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."

"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization by managing traffic well, enhancing access security, operational efficiency, and user experience, leading to customer satisfaction."

"They are the only solution that fits our success criteria and business objectives: WAF must have a low (<5%) false negative rate and be ready to protect from all well-known web attacks."

"With active threat detection, we are no longer over-swamped with tons of useless events."

"Perimeter control and active vulnerability scanner are the most valuable features."

"The most powerful feature is the ability to first learn what type of query to make to your web application when it is attacked and what type of query creates a false positive to your app."

"Vulnerability scanner and WAF are valuable features."

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

Cons

"I do not have much to say about the improvement, but a more innovative solution for sniffing more on the network would be great, and having the advanced ability to close off ports when they could be getting tested from hackers for intrusion would be helpful."

"Additionally, I can say that deeper API security features such as automation, API discovery, scheme validations, and improved protections for modern environments are needed."

"My only concerns are that it is not very user-friendly and the response time is slow."

"The interface of Barracuda Application Protection is generally intuitive but can become complex for advanced configurations."

"One area where Barracuda Application Protection can improve is in policy tuning and ease of configuration, especially for complex application and API-heavy environments."

"Barracuda Application Protection could be improved with a more user-friendly interface to enable all types of people to be able to use it, especially the less technical users."

"Improving the operating system structure, firmware, and overall performance would enhance loading times for devices."

"Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses."

"Technical support is 6 or 7 out of 10. Sometimes we have had trouble with communication and understanding."

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm."

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

"There were several stability issues during the first pilot."

"Wallarm uses a learning mechanism to detect attacks and to avoid false positives. If Wallarm blocks some illegitimate request, then you can go to the management console and mark this request as false positive, but sometimes this does not work properly."

"It needs more customization in PDF reports."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Transportation Company

20%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Application Protection?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I feel it is a bit costlier, but the features that it provides are good. However, I am not the one making decisions on costing and limi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda Application Protection?

I believe Barracuda Application Protection could be significantly improved with better usability and integration with other tools. Barracuda Application Protection's WAF serves as a primary defense...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Barracuda Application Protection?

My main use case for Barracuda Application Protection encompasses most of their capabilities. I have used it for APIs, protecting applications, and securing applications for these types of instances.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Operant AI vs Barracuda Application Protection

Compared 39% of the time

Invicti vs Barracuda Application Protection

Compared 35% of the time

Netacea Bot Management vs Barracuda Application Protection

Compared 27% of the time

More Barracuda Application Protection Competitors

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Venusense Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 9% of the time

Cequence Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 8% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 8% of the time

Akamai API Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 7% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Application Protection

May 2026

Download Barracuda Application Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

April 2026

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Barracuda Application Protection provides robust application security, delivering comprehensive protection tailored for IT professionals seeking advanced web security measures.

Barracuda Application Protection is designed to safeguard web applications against vulnerabilities and cyber threats. It offers a cutting-edge, integrated platform that ensures sophisticated security measures for future-proofing organizational IT infrastructure. With scalable solutions, it caters to diverse business needs and enhances overall security posture.

What are the key features of Barracuda Application Protection?

Comprehensive Web Application Firewall: Provides real-time defense against web threats.
Automated DDoS Protection: Protects against distributed denial-of-service attacks with automatic response capabilities.
Advanced Bot Protection: Identifies and mitigates automated bot attacks efficiently.
API Security: Offers robust security measures for API communications, preventing unauthorized access.

What benefits or ROI should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Users report significant improvements in application security with real-time threat detection.
Operational Efficiency: Automated protection features reduce manual interventions, saving time and resources.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing security requirements, supporting expansion plans.
Cost Savings: Decreases potential financial losses by preventing breaches.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and ecommerce, Barracuda Application Protection is implemented to strengthen security frameworks. It ensures sensitive data protection, compliance adherence, and reduces downtime, thereby supporting critical operations across sectors.

Barracuda Networks

Wallarm NG WAF provides advanced security by integrating machine learning, making it essential for modern web applications. It offers protection against sophisticated threats and automates many processes.

Wallarm NG WAF leverages AI-driven technology to deliver robust security measures. It helps in defending web applications from cybersecurity threats with enhanced threat detection and response capabilities. Beyond vulnerability insights, Wallarm enhances security protocols, scales with growing online demands, and ensures comprehensive threat coverage, fostering a safer web environment.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

AI-Powered Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates sophisticated attacks efficiently.
Automated Security Updates: Continuously updates defense strategies without manual intervention.
Flexible Deployment: Easily integrates across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid setups.
Scalability: Adapts to growing traffic volumes with consistent protection.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive analytics on web security posture.

What benefits can users expect from Wallarm NG WAF?

Increased Security: Enhances threat detection and reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention with automated tasks.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes security expenditure by preventing potential breaches.
Time Savings: Automates repetitive actions, saving valuable time for IT teams.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and healthcare, Wallarm NG WAF is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with stringent security standards. Its adaptability allows it to meet industry-specific requirements, offering specialized configurations tailored to each sector's unique demands.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Application Protection vs. Wallarm NG WAF

April 2026

Free Report: Barracuda Application Protection vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Application Protection vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Barracuda Application Protection vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best API Security vendors.

We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.