Bamboo vs IBM Rational Build Forge vs Jenkins comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
3,414 views|3,401 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
679 views|600 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,896 views|5,921 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bamboo, IBM Rational Build Forge, and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's one of the best solutions in this line of work. We have many Atlassian products. We use Bamboo, JIRA, Service Desk, and some other Atlassian plugins. We like that it's easy to integrate into each other. It's a suite of services.""The most useful feature of Bamboo is its integration with other solutions such as Jira and BitBucket, also offered by Atlassian. It is easier to use tools all provided by one vendor.""The most valuable features are compiling and deployment.""The most valuable feature of Bamboo is that it is a good tool for CI/CD integration.""In my experience Bamboo is scalable.""The platform helps us with automated and timely backup. It provides data replication as well.""Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.""It can do the CI pipeline well."

More Bamboo Pros →

"All features are useful. Our customer doesn't have any complaints about the tool. It works pretty well for what they want and what they need to do.""Very good reporting features."

More IBM Rational Build Forge Pros →

"Jenkins is very easy to use.""We used it for all continuous integration parts, like automation testing, deployment, etc.""A lot of support material exists via a single web search of exactly what you're looking for.""Jenkins optimizes the CI/CD process, enhances automation, and ensures efficiency and management of our build and deployment pipeline.""Jenkins integrates with multiple tools like Bitbucket and makes life easier. We don't have to write a lot of code since a lot of libraries are available.""We can schedule anything with Jenkins, which is useful for deployment or anything that requires scheduling. It also has multiple plugins we can use for Maven, JUnit, etc.""Having builds and test tasks triggered on commit helps not to break the product.""The most valuable feature of Jenkins is its continuous deployment. We can deploy to multi-cluster and multi-regions in the cloud."

More Jenkins Pros →

Cons
"Bamboo could improve by having compatibility with GitLab. It would be better to have this platform for deploying code and storing container registries. Bamboo does not have a container registry. Additionally, there could be more features added.""Bamboo is a bit complicated to use compared to other solutions, such as GitLab. You have to integrate different actions that are difficult that could be made easier.""The marketing strategy of Bamboo is an area of concern where improvements are needed.""Bamboo’s technical support services, in terms of speed of response, need improvement.""It would be great if Bamboo could introduce a more containerized deployment model.""It can be challenging for someone new to the system or ecosystem to grasp, making it difficult to train new people and help them understand.""One area that could be enhanced is the governance process, particularly with regard to building approvals and transitions between stages. In comparison to other solutions, such as Jira, which features a workflow that supports approval processes, this capability is not natively available in Bamboo. To implement this functionality, integration with other solutions, such as GSM may be necessary. Although some add-ons, such as Adaptavist ScriptRunner, are available in the market to circumvent this limitation, they may not offer the exact functionality needed. Therefore, there is certainly room for improvement in this area.""It's a little outdated. It's three years old."

More Bamboo Cons →

"Its logging can be improved. When something goes wrong, it is not always very easy to find the problem. It is hard to identify whether the problem is because of low memory in the server or some configuration in Rational Build Forge. The error logs are not very detailed, and they should provide more information. It should also have more integration with third-party tools. It would be great to have more integration with third-party tools.""Not user friendly for the layman."

More IBM Rational Build Forge Cons →

"The scriptwriting process could be improved in this solution in the future.""Jenkins should adopt the Pipeline as Code approach by building a deployment pipeline using the Jenkins file.""I would like them to provide space for people to have a central node that stores all the logs of workspace information in a distributed fashion to facilitate backup and restoration. Currently, everything is stored on one node, so you need to set up distributed storage or an endpoint that you can use for backing up your information.""The upgrades need improvement.""I would like to have an integrated dashboard on top of it and a better UX to look at. The dashboard could be better in terms of integration with other tools. We should be able to have a single pane of glass across all the tools that we use where Jenkins is the pipeline. This can be a very good upgrade to it.""In our case, we have several products built using Jenkins. It is quite difficult to navigate into the latest stable build in a given OS.""Jenkins is an old product, and we encounter performance issues and slow response. Also, some of the plugins are not stable.""Jenkins could improve by allowing more scripting languages. We need to use Groovy scripting and it is difficult to debug and it is not ideal for creating file scripts. We tried to search for assistance but we did not find much help."

More Jenkins Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."
  • "If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."
  • "The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."
  • "The price of Bamboo is reasonable."
  • "I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."
  • More Bamboo Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty much just got into its teen years in regards to mobile development. Well, subjectively, of course. You can see all levels of mobile CI these days. Some would still install builds from Xcode, others would have a quickly patched up build server under their desk. Xcode Bots meet the needs of yet another group of people. Travis CI is good and for open source projects it’s probably the best option. And guess what, I know few successful iOS development companies that develop apps for enterprise clients, and have no CI at all. The advanced level of CI would include distributed build systems with multiple build nodes, support for automated unit and UI tests, running tests on simulator and physical devices, automatic deployment to TestFlight, Hockey App, Over the Air, and much more. It becomes not just mobile development, but spans into areas like DevOps and others. Etsy’s blog post is somewhat outdated but still a very good example of where this path can take you. If you decide to take mobile CI under your total control, you have to pick a build server to start with. I personally have worked with Bamboo for 1.5 years and I’m dealing with Jenkins right now, so I have few insights… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten.
    Top Answer:The tools and capabilities of the system are extensive. It can be challenging for someone new to the system or ecosystem… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,414
    Comparisons
    3,401
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    542
    Rating
    7.7
    19th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    679
    Comparisons
    600
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,896
    Comparisons
    5,921
    Reviews
    39
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    GitLab logo
    Compared 43% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    JFrog Pipeline logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Bazel logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Rational Build Forge
    Learn More
    Overview
    Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.

    IBM Rational Build Forge is an adaptive execution framework that helps automate and standardize the software assembly process. Rational Build Forge helps teams standardize repetitive tasks, improve software quality and manage compliance mandates. This software scales to 25 seats. Rational Build Forge delivers:
    Flexibility - gives developers self-service access to preconfigured build processes from within their integrated development environment (IDE). You can add IBM Rational software products to further enhance automation, reporting and integration.
    Productivity - accelerates build and release cycles through iterative development, parallel processes and efficient use of hardware.
    Compliance - simplifies compliance management with self-documenting audit trails and role-based security.
    Compatibility - increases team efficiency with centralized build and release management using the tools you have today.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Sample Customers
    Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire
    Cars.com
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Marketing Services Firm10%
    Non Tech Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Educational Organization10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.