Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs Oracle Java Cloud Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 1.0% mindshare in PSP, compared to Oracle’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 11 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

563 Views
535 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Read 16 Oracle Java Cloud Service reviews

546 Views
442 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Oracle Java Cloud Service and Azure Red Hat OpenShift are competitors in the cloud solutions market. Azure Red Hat OpenShift often stands out due to its comprehensive feature set, whereas Oracle Java Cloud Service offers commendable pricing and support.

Features: Oracle Java Cloud Service enables seamless integration within the Oracle ecosystem, facilitates management of Java apps and databases, and allows flexible deployment options. It supports migrating workloads from platforms like IBM WebSphere. Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides robust container orchestration through Kubernetes, expansive DevOps support, and automated scaling capabilities, offering versatility to enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Java Cloud Service could enhance its feature diversity beyond the Oracle ecosystem and improve cloud-native support to appeal to a wider range of users. It may also advance its scalability features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift, while feature-rich, could refine its cost structure to offer better value, and increase ease of use in its complex setup procedures. It might also expand options for small and medium enterprises to leverage its services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Java Cloud Service offers a straightforward deployment experience with strong support, enhancing customer assistance within its ecosystem. Azure Red Hat OpenShift benefits from Microsoft's and Red Hat's collaboration, providing streamlined container deployments and a robust support network. Its flexibility is notable in complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Java Cloud Service is competitively priced with emphasis on cost-effectiveness for Oracle users, showing favorable ROI within that context. Azure Red Hat OpenShift, albeit at a higher price point, presents advanced features that secure its higher ROI, particularly when integrated into diverse enterprise infrastructures beyond the Oracle environment.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Java Cloud Service is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Red Hat OpenShift	1.0%
Oracle Java Cloud Service	0.8%
Other	98.2%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

DeepakMishra

CEO, Head of Sales and Business Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Integrated cloud platform has streamlined app delivery and supported certified marketplace products

A potential area for improvement for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is to see managed identity support and ensure that some of the security features are not conflicting with Azure or Azure product features. I am sure in the future it will be more templatized so that we need not depend on Azure security features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift should be independent of Azure security features with respect to container scan and all that. Why would it use an Azure security feature? That is what I find. It is still yet to be GA and commonly available, but that is a strong reason for improvement.

Read full review

Adam Elguennioui

SAP Consultant at SA&BC

Offers flexibility and better accessibility to users

The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always something to take into account. I would like to be more comfortable working with it and feeling safer. In the future, the tool can be made faster. In the future, I would like to see maybe some AI features in the tool to help automate stuff. You need to be able to create your own models to help create some automated actions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

"As a consulting company, we implement Azure Red Hat OpenShift for our clients, who appreciate its integration capabilities for enhancing cloud operations. While we handle implementation, build processes, and automation, the operational responsibility lies with the customer. The service provides basic processes and support from Red Hat and Microsoft, which benefits clients by allowing them to focus on their business rather than regular operations like cluster upgrades."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

"The solution's technical support is good."

"Cloud has provided less maintenance."

"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."

"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."

"It is pretty easy to use."

"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."

"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."

"One key feature is getting to choose the Virtual Machine configurations while setting up the server, which is an automated process."

More Oracle Java Cloud Service pros

Cons

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

"I would rate the technical support from Microsoft as six."

"Automation could be improved."

"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."

"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."

"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."

"The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution."

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"It is somewhat expensive."

"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."

"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

My use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is for an employee engagement application and HR, and I have also used it for an agentic bot.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Java Cloud Service?

The solution's technical support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Java Cloud Service?

I did a comparative study on the pricing between Oracle and SAP S/4HANA, but it was related to databases and in the areas associated with the clouds. I can tell that Oracle is a little more expensi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Java Cloud Service?

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 28% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 17% of the time

Google Cloud vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Application Container Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 19% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

More Oracle Java Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

January 2026

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service

January 2026

Download Oracle Java Cloud Service product report

Overview

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. Kubernetes is at the core of Red Hat OpenShift. OpenShift brings added-value features to complement Kubernetes, making it a turnkey container platform as a service (PaaS) with a significantly improved developer and operator experience.

Microsoft

Oracle Java Cloud Service is a complete platform and infrastructure cloud solution for building, deploying, and managing Java EE applications. Use Oracle Java Cloud Service to rapidly provision an application environment with Oracle WebLogic Server as the application container, Oracle Coherence as a caching and data grid tier, and Oracle Traffic Director as the software load balancer—all on top of infrastructure provided by Oracle Compute Cloud Service.

For more information on Oracle Java Cloud Service, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.