Azure Network Watcher vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations comparison

Microsoft and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #42 with an average rating of 8.5, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #73. Microsoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

Azure Network Watcher

Read 13 Azure Network Watcher reviews

1,082 Views
1,039 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews

1,820 Views
1,329 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Network Watcher

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and Azure Network Watcher operate in the IT monitoring and security analytics category, focusing on network visibility and monitoring respectively. ExtraHop seems to have an upper hand in providing comprehensive security features, while Azure Network Watcher excels in cloud-centric integration.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations delivers real-time network visibility, advanced security analytics, and threat detection capabilities, making it suitable for security-driven environments. Azure Network Watcher provides integrated Azure ecosystem monitoring, diagnostic tools, and seamless alerts within Azure infrastructure, which are valuable for cloud-centric operations.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop Reveal(x) could improve by offering more cost-effective cloud deployment options, increased ease in non-security features, and better native integration with cloud services. Azure Network Watcher could enhance its offering by providing richer on-premises monitoring tools, improved non-Azure ecosystem integration, and enhanced real-time security analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) provides flexible deployment options for both on-premises and hybrid environments, featuring dedicated support services. Azure Network Watcher offers straightforward deployment within Azure but may require additional support when integrating with non-Azure services. ExtraHop's deployment versatility could be beneficial for diverse IT infrastructures, while Azure Network Watcher is convenient for established Azure users.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) entails a higher upfront cost, justified by its comprehensive analytics and security features leading to a substantial ROI. Azure Network Watcher, with its cost-effective pricing, is appealing particularly for organizations utilizing Azure, contributing to a budget-friendly approach for cloud-centric businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Network Watcher vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Network Watcher

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

42nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

73rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (11th), IT Operations Analytics (14th), Network Packet Capture (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Network Watcher is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Network Watcher	0.5%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations	0.6%
Other	98.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Bijoyendra Roychowdhury

Program Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Network monitoring provides comprehensive analytics while the interface requires further development

The quality of Azure Network Watcher is quite good in terms of the in-depth analysis you can create from these matrices. There are other monitoring tools such as New Relic, AppDynamics, and Dynatrace which provide very detailed network tracing. Cloud providers such as Azure or AWS do not have that kind of GUI-based capability at this point, but using PowerShell or Python, you can develop it yourself. From the GUI perspective, it still needs to evolve in terms of quality and standard, though overall, it is quite good for troubleshooting. Regarding areas for improvement, when comparing to other network tools beyond Azure Monitor or Azure Network Watcher, those tools can identify single failed packets. This level of granularity is not currently possible with cloud providers as they only go to a certain level rather than the granular level needed for deep troubleshooting, though they do provide hints with available matrices.

Read full review

Out West

Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations

We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides good visibility."

"The stability is very good. I rate it a ten out of ten."

"Azure Network Watcher provides valuable features based on your specific requirements and use cases, helping you monitor network bandwidth, throughput, data flow consumption, and control costs by giving insight into egress and ingress traffic, total input and output operations, bandwidth, and threats through IP identification."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is the cloud-native application firewall, which is helpful for securing databases."

"The most valuable features I have found are typology, visualization, and capture."

"We use the solution to monitor network services. It helps to capture any network issues."

"I like the visibility."

"The solution is stable."

More Azure Network Watcher pros

"We have been able to improve the mean time to resolution by several hours in some cases."

"You cannot hide from the wire; all truth lives in the packets, and ExtraHop gets them to talk!"

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."

"Wire data analytics."

"ExtraHop came out with the best price, and I think that it gives us a broader view of our network."

"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."

"ExtraHop is far ahead of anything comparable in the industry."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations pros

Cons

"Azure is good, however, the Fortinet GUI is more intuitive and I like it more than anything else."

"Azure Network Watcher needs to have better documentation and it needs to capture information accurately."

"The initial setup and deployment could be improved to be simplified."

"User experience could be improved."

"Sometimes, you encounter a VPN tunnel, network, or routing issue, but finding out more about the blockage is challenging."

"I still use Wireshark and Azure Network Watcher to get the required data. My team captures the traffic from Azure Network Watcher, downloads it, then imports that traffic into Wireshark to get more details on the number of hits and replies, for example. If you can do that on Azure Network Watcher and have Wireshark built-in, that would make Azure Network Watcher better. If Azure Network Watcher has that functionality where you won't need a third-party tool to get what you need, that would be helpful. I'm also expecting more from Azure Network Watcher. It's more complex than knowing how the IP flows from its source to the destination. The tool also needs more open-source features, such as having some built-in Wireshark that improves monitoring for customers. Sometimes, you encounter a VPN tunnel, network, or routing issue, but finding out more about the blockage is challenging. Is it one hundred percent an Azure issue? Is it a peer issue? You don't get complete information from Azure Network Watcher, so you must use other tools and depend on your strategies to resolve a specific issue. If more features could be added in the next release of Azure Network Watcher, specifically ones you can find on open-source tools, then that would be a plus point for the tool."

"The solution could use some additional components of the network culture, not only VMs. I'd like to see some additional security features because what they currently have concentrates only on the network."

"Azure Network Watcher could improve by having other built-in applications, for example, an application to log activities for inbound and outbound traffic."

More Azure Network Watcher cons

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."

"The improvement that would make the most impact would be expanding on the new EXA big data back end."

"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"The improvement that would make the most impact would be expanding on the new EXA big data back end."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Price-wise, I have no information on how much Azure Network Watcher costs."

"The pricing is good. It's not too expensive."

"Azure Network Watcher is a little bit expensive."

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

University

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Network Watcher?

I do not have the exact setup cost information on hand, but it is available in the public Azure portal. You can access the calculator there to get detailed pricing information.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Network Watcher?

The main area for improvement is AI-based features. Currently, many intelligent tools are coming from third parties, and Azure Network Watcher needs to improve in this area. The focus should be on ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Network Watcher?

Azure Network Watcher is used for monitoring network traffic. It provides insight into egress and ingress traffic, which helps determine whether consumption can be controlled. Most Azure services c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 23% of the time

Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 17% of the time

Ixia Network Taps vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 7% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Network Watcher Competitors

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 9% of the time

LiveNX vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 7% of the time

ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 6% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

StableNet vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 3% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher

March 2026

Download Azure Network Watcher product report

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

March 2026

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report

Overview

Azure Network Watcher is a comprehensive network monitoring and diagnostic service offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a range of tools and capabilities to help users monitor, diagnose, and gain insights into their Azure network infrastructure. With Network Watcher, users can capture and analyze network traffic, monitor network performance, troubleshoot connectivity issues, and gain visibility into network topology. It also offers features like packet capture, flow logs, connection monitoring, and VPN diagnostics to ensure the smooth operation of Azure networks. Network Watcher enables users to proactively identify and resolve network issues, optimize network performance, and enhance the overall reliability and security of their Azure network environment.

Microsoft

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

March 2026

Free Report: Azure Network Watcher vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Network Watcher vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Network Watcher vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.