Azure Monitor vs Honeycomb.io comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
19,148 views|16,331 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Honeycomb.io Logo
2,724 views|2,379 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Honeycomb.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I am impressed by the reporting on the average eight ports that we get from this solution.""The initial setup is straightforward.""It's a service from Microsoft, so it will scale.""The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth.""Good load and metrics gathering and very good analysis.""Log analytics and log queries are the most valuable features of Azure Monitor.""Technical support is helpful.""For me, the best feature is the log analysis with Azure Monitor's Log Analytics. Without being able to analyze the logs of all the activities that affect the performance of a machine, your monitoring effectiveness will be severely limited."

More Azure Monitor Pros →

"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."

More Honeycomb.io Pros →

Cons
"Setting up this solution is complex. It's also missing the functionality of assigning alerts.""Azure Monitor could improve network performance monitoring and make it more advanced.""We cannot use AI services with the solution.""If it is configured incorrectly, you can end up with a huge bill.""Although it's not always the case, the price can sometimes get expensive. This depends on a number of factors, such as how many services you are trying to integrate with Azure Monitor and how much storage they're consuming each month (for example, how large are the log files?).""We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own.""Enhancing and reaching a level of detail that facilitates pinpointing and addressing issues at such a refined level within the application and database components would be helpful.""It's really complex to retrieve or query the logs in Azure Monitor."

More Azure Monitor Cons →

"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."

More Honeycomb.io Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."
  • "Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."
  • "The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."
  • "The licensing is a monthly fee."
  • "I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."
  • "The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."
  • More Azure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we… more »
    Top Answer:Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
    Top Answer:We cannot use AI services with the solution.
    Top Answer:The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team.
    Top Answer:The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team. It would be good if Honeycomb.io could integrate with third-party tools or paid… more »
    Top Answer:There aren't any specific use cases for the solution as such. In our company, we use the solution for SLA and SLO-related work.
    Ranking
    Views
    19,148
    Comparisons
    16,331
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    7.7
    Views
    2,724
    Comparisons
    2,379
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    414
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Datadog logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Dynatrace logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Prometheus logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Sentry logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Grafana logo
    Compared 34% of the time.
    Sentry logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Chronosphere logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    New Relic logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Datadog logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    Honeycomb.io
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure. 

    With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts. 

    Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.  

    Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility. 

    Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

    Many offerings tout observability. How is Honeycomb different? We have defined what Observability is and have built a tool to help modern Dev, DevOps and Site Reliability Engineering teams operate more efficiently. Because it’s all about delivering high quality code, maintaining reliability and getting precious time back.

    We made a critical decision to provide a seamless, current view of your system (from logs to events and traces) in a single data store, regardless of how complex your architecture is. This means you no longer have to toil with multiple tools or stitched-together solutions – burning time as you address issues affecting users.

    We also believe strongly that optimizing systems and debugging should not be difficult and draining, freeing up more time to ship new code. Our approach emphasizes efficiency and knowledge sharing, thereby elevating everyone’s game and ultimately business outcomes.

    Sample Customers
    Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
    Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Honeycomb.io is ranked 35th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Honeycomb.io is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Honeycomb.io writes "A valuable solution for application teams to identify downtime and SLO-related issues". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Instana Dynamic APM, whereas Honeycomb.io is most compared with Grafana, Sentry, Chronosphere, New Relic and Datadog.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.