Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Chronosphere vs Honeycomb.io comparison

Chronosphere and Honeycomb.io are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Chronosphere is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.0, while Honeycomb.io is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.0. Chronosphere holds a 0.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Honeycomb.io’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Chronosphere users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Honeycomb.io users who would recommend it.
Chronosphere
Read 1 Chronosphere review
  • 709 Views
  • 560 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Honeycomb.io
Read 2 Honeycomb.io reviews
  • 2,599 Views
  • 2,225 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Honeycomb.io and Chronosphere are competing products in the observability sector. While Honeycomb.io is praised for its straightforward pricing and robust support, Chronosphere is often preferred for its extensive feature set, justifying its higher cost in large-scale environments.

Features: Honeycomb.io offers advanced query capabilities, a robust event-based data model for quick troubleshooting, and is effective in anomaly detection. Chronosphere provides comprehensive data collection, federation features for scalability, and advanced real-time analytics for deeper insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Honeycomb.io features smooth integration with detailed documentation and hands-on support, ensuring an easy initial setup. Chronosphere offers customizable deployment options with professional support that emphasizes operational guidance. Honeycomb.io's setup is less complex, but Chronosphere's onboarding is more comprehensive for enterprise-level solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Honeycomb.io offers transparent pricing with lower initial costs, making it suitable for small to medium-sized organizations, delivering high ROI through efficient troubleshooting. Chronosphere incurs higher costs but offers significant ROI through data optimization and performance, appealing to large-scale deployments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Chronosphere
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
30th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (34th), AIOps (15th)
Honeycomb.io
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
24th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Chronosphere is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Honeycomb.io is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Arvind Pant - PeerSpot reviewer
Monitors pipelines with real-time alerts and good documentation
It isn't very easy. It's not easy for everyone. It would be much easier if there could be a simpler version, like a data number version or an SQL version. It's hard to debug if you don't know the syntax. Also, I saw the Slack alerts feature, which is pretty cool, but I cannot customize my messages on the Slack alerts. It would be great if it were possible to tag people in the alerts. At DoorDash, we have hundreds of pipelines, and if something fails, I want to tag specific people so they can start working on the issue immediately.
Read full review
Diego Gomes De Lima - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use and the dashboard is very intuitive
We faced some OpenTelemetry metrics lost between the communication from the service and the Honeycomb.io. I can't say if this is a Honeycomb.io issue or if there are some limitations in OpenTelemetry. Alerts are very helpful in Honeycomb.io, but we don't usually merge because we can compare queries with queries for making alerts. We can make alerts based on static numbers, which may block us from building alerts that could be generic enough or could be serviced.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The alerting features are good"
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."
"The solution's most valuable features are the queries for the OpenTelemetry events and all the tracing."
 

Cons

"It's not easy for everyone."
"We can make alerts based on static numbers, which may block us from building alerts that could be generic enough or could be serviced."
"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Retailer
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Chronosphere?
It isn't very easy. It's not easy for everyone. It would be much easier if there could be a simpler version, like a data number version or an SQL version. It's hard to debug if you don't know the s...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Chronosphere?
I work as a data engineer, and we have many streaming pipelines. We use Chronosphere to monitor various metrics, such as how much data our pipeline is processing in each batch, the volume of incomi...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Chronosphere?
If you want to monitor pipelines and use something like Kafka or any streaming platform, Chronosphere is the best option for monitoring pipelines with real-time alerts. It is loosely coupled with y...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Honeycomb.io?
We faced some OpenTelemetry metrics lost between the communication from the service and the Honeycomb.io. I can't say if this is a Honeycomb.io issue or if there are some limitations in OpenTelemet...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Honeycomb.io?
The solution is mainly used for stack observability. It observes service behavior or any kind of failure that may be happening. The tool is also related to research. My company is working more on t...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Honeycomb.io?
We set up Honeycomb.io on all the services so that we can have all the set traces of the communication between all the services inside the company. This helps us understand where it could be failin...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Grafana vs Chronosphere Logo
Grafana vs Chronosphere
Compared 18% of the time
Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM) vs Chronosphere Logo
Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM) vs Chronosphere
Compared 18% of the time
Datadog vs Chronosphere Logo
Datadog vs Chronosphere
Compared 17% of the time
Dynatrace vs Chronosphere Logo
Dynatrace vs Chronosphere
Compared 11% of the time
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Chronosphere Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Chronosphere
Compared 10% of the time
More Chronosphere Competitors
Sentry vs Honeycomb.io Logo
Sentry vs Honeycomb.io
Compared 26% of the time
Grafana vs Honeycomb.io Logo
Grafana vs Honeycomb.io
Compared 18% of the time
Datadog vs Honeycomb.io Logo
Datadog vs Honeycomb.io
Compared 12% of the time
Zabbix vs Honeycomb.io Logo
Zabbix vs Honeycomb.io
Compared 6% of the time
AWS X-Ray vs Honeycomb.io Logo
AWS X-Ray vs Honeycomb.io
Compared 3% of the time
More Honeycomb.io Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
May 2025
Chronosphere reportDownload Chronosphere product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
May 2025
Honeycomb.io reportDownload Honeycomb.io product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Grit
 

Overview

Chronosphere provides a robust platform for managing and monitoring cloud-native applications with features like real-time observability, incident management, and capacity planning. It offers scalable, detailed observability across complex systems, an intuitive interface, and cost-efficient resource management. Users report enhanced productivity, improved collaboration, and better decision-making, bolstering operational capabilities and organizational growth.

Chronosphere

Honeycomb.io offers a comprehensive platform for observability, facilitating debugging and analysis of production systems through real-time data insights.

This advanced observability tool is tailored for engineering teams, providing deep insight into complex systems' performance. Honeycomb.io enables real-time data analysis, empowering teams to quickly identify and resolve issues, ensuring optimized system performance and reliability. Its innovative approach allows seamless integration into production workflows, enhancing the capability to observe and debug systems efficiently.

What are the key features of Honeycomb.io?
  • Query Builder: Enables complex queries to analyze and visualize data effectively.
  • BubbleUp: Assists in pinpointing anomalous behaviors in vast datasets.
  • Tracing: Provides detailed traces that help in understanding request flows.
  • Service Maps: Visualizes architecture dependencies aiding comprehension.
What benefits should users look for in Honeycomb.io reviews?
  • Rapid Problem Resolution: Reduces mean time to resolution by offering clear diagnostics.
  • Cost Efficiency: Enables resource optimization by understanding usage patterns.
  • Improved Collaboration: Facilitates cross-team communication through shared insights.
  • Increased Productivity: Streamlines workflows, freeing up time for development.

Implementation of Honeycomb.io spans multiple industries, enhancing system reliability and performance. In e-commerce, it offers robust monitoring of online services to mitigate downtime. In fintech, it ensures secure and seamless transactions, protecting against potential failures. SaaS companies utilize it for maintaining seamless experience by identifying bottlenecks swiftly. Honeycomb.io's scalability ensures it meets growing demands of dynamic industry requirements.

Honeycomb.io
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
May 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.