• Home
  • Chronosphere vs. Honeycomb.io

Chronosphere vs Honeycomb.io comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Chronosphere Logo

Chronosphere

822 views|745 comparisons
Honeycomb.io Logo

Honeycomb.io

Read 1 Honeycomb.io review
2,724 views|2,379 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Chronosphere and Honeycomb.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Chronosphere?
Anonymous User
A valuable solution for application teams to identify downtime and SLO-related issues
Honeycomb.io facilitates the identification of service downtime by integrating with our logging endpoint in Splunk. We log the endpoint in Splunk,... Read more →
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Honeycomb.io?
Top Answer:The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team.
What needs improvement with Honeycomb.io?
Top Answer:The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team. It would be good if Honeycomb.io could integrate with third-party tools or paid… more »
What is your primary use case for Honeycomb.io?
Top Answer:There aren't any specific use cases for the solution as such. In our company, we use the solution for SLA and SLO-related work.
Ranking
54th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
822
Comparisons
745
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
35th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
2,724
Comparisons
2,379
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
414
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Datadog logo
Datadog vs. Chronosphere
Compared 28% of the time.
Grafana logo
Grafana vs. Chronosphere
Compared 14% of the time.
Dynatrace logo
Dynatrace vs. Chronosphere
Compared 7% of the time.
Splunk APM logo
Splunk APM vs. Chronosphere
Compared 5% of the time.
More Chronosphere Competitors   →
Grafana logo
Grafana vs. Honeycomb.io
Compared 34% of the time.
Sentry logo
Sentry vs. Honeycomb.io
Compared 17% of the time.
New Relic logo
New Relic vs. Honeycomb.io
Compared 8% of the time.
Azure Monitor logo
Azure Monitor vs. Honeycomb.io
Compared 6% of the time.
Datadog logo
Datadog vs. Honeycomb.io
Compared 5% of the time.
More Honeycomb.io Competitors   →
Learn More
Chronosphere
Honeycomb.io
Video Not Available
Overview

Chronosphere is the only observability platform that puts you back in control by taming rampant data growth and cloud-native complexity, delivering increased business confidence.

Many offerings tout observability. How is Honeycomb different? We have defined what Observability is and have built a tool to help modern Dev, DevOps and Site Reliability Engineering teams operate more efficiently. Because it’s all about delivering high quality code, maintaining reliability and getting precious time back.

We made a critical decision to provide a seamless, current view of your system (from logs to events and traces) in a single data store, regardless of how complex your architecture is. This means you no longer have to toil with multiple tools or stitched-together solutions – burning time as you address issues affecting users.

We also believe strongly that optimizing systems and debugging should not be difficult and draining, freeing up more time to ship new code. Our approach emphasizes efficiency and knowledge sharing, thereby elevating everyone’s game and ultimately business outcomes.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm17%
Manufacturing Company13%
Computer Software Company13%
Retailer8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm22%
Computer Software Company15%
Comms Service Provider8%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise65%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise66%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Chronosphere is ranked 54th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Honeycomb.io is ranked 35th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. Chronosphere is rated 0.0, while Honeycomb.io is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Honeycomb.io writes "A valuable solution for application teams to identify downtime and SLO-related issues". Chronosphere is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Dynatrace, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM) and Splunk APM, whereas Honeycomb.io is most compared with Grafana, Sentry, New Relic, Azure Monitor and Datadog.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.