Azure Firewall Manager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud comparison

Microsoft and Fortinet are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Microsoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.3, while Fortinet is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Microsoft holds a 3.5% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Fortinet’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Azure Firewall Manager

Read 9 Azure Firewall Manager reviews

1,563 Views
797 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Read 80 Fortinet FortiGate Cloud reviews

5,628 Views
1,520 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Azure Firewall Manager

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and Azure Firewall Manager are products that compete in the cloud-based security management solutions category. Azure Firewall Manager seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive security features and robust scalability, appealing particularly to larger infrastructures.

Features: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers seamless integration with Fortinet's security ecosystem, advanced threat protection, and straightforward policy management. Azure Firewall Manager provides comprehensive threat intelligence, centralized management, and extensive scalability for large infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud could enhance its scalability options and provide more detailed documentation for complex deployment scenarios. It might also improve threat intelligence features to better compete with Azure Firewall Manager. Azure Firewall Manager could simplify its initial setup process and offer more cost-effective plans for smaller businesses. It might also provide more user-friendly interfaces to ease management tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is noted for its user-friendly setup and responsive customer service, ensuring an easy transition to the cloud. Azure Firewall Manager, while more complex to deploy due to advanced security configurations, offers robust customer support with detailed setup guidance for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud generally requires a lower initial investment, making it attractive for smaller businesses with competitive ROI. Azure Firewall Manager involves higher setup costs but offers a stronger ROI in environments needing extensive security management and scalability, potentially justifying the additional expense with its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (25th)

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of Azure Firewall Manager is 3.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is 5.4%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud	5.4%
Azure Firewall Manager	3.5%
Other	91.1%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Sikkander Batcha

DevOps Engineer at CloudIQ

Has managed traffic effectively but lacks visibility and advanced control features

Azure Firewall is typically behind other vendor firewalls because we don't see what kind of traffic is traveling through it. That is one drawback. The main drawback is that we need log support from Azure Firewall, which can be quite costly. There is no login feature in Azure Firewall because only the IAM feature is available in the Azure site; we manage it only through the Azure portal, not through any other portal. Other vendors, such as Palo Alto, provide GUI or CLI interfaces to manage their firewalls, whereas we only manage Azure Firewall through the Azure portal. In the future, I would like to see additional features in Azure Firewall Manager to make it more competitive, such as technologies like App-ID and User-ID that Palo Alto has. Azure Firewall currently only allows traffic based on layer four and sometimes layer seven, so they need to improve in those areas compared to other vendors.

Read full review

Firman Sanjaya

Security Engineer at Exclusive Networks

Cloud logs have supported long-term auditing but security vulnerabilities still raise concerns

It depends on the user. When he needs maybe data retention for one year, for three months or more, I recommend Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. If he doesn't want to set the log on FortiAnalyzer, I will recommend him with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. It depends. As I mentioned before, if they don't have a syslog server or any other SIEM, I will recommend it. If they need an audit for one year of data retention, I will recommend it because it's worth the money for one year of log retention. It's straightforward. If I enable Fortinet FortiGate Cloud feature on the FortiGate on-premise or VM, it will copy the configuration on the cloud. Depending on my license, I can configure it or have it as read-only with a limited license. That's one of the main purposes of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for me. The report doesn't have many templates, but the log retention is so good with one-year retention. If you compare it with the FortiAnalyzer or maybe with any other product such as a FortiSIEM template, with the limited license, you only get the 360 template, it's called. I think the security function, I mainly use it for configuration purposes and log retention purposes. The security is the same as the VM or the hardware, I think. The sandbox. I think it has it, but not a lot if you only have the default capability with only 10 files per minute. I think the user needs to be selective with the files that they want to send to the sandbox on the cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"We are utilizing Azure Entra ID for group labeling, so Active Directory, or now it is Entra ID, securing our application for everyone who accesses it, and Azure Firewall Manager is definitely securing our projects and all its features are fine."

"The best feature of Azure Firewall Manager is that it is easy to maintain and configure."

"From a traffic management perspective, it's a good firewall because it's automatically scalable based on the traffic availability."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration."

"The tool's support is good."

"It has helped us in multiple ways; for example, we don't require different spaces to manage it, we can do a lot of automation integrations into the code, we could integrate it into the DevOps pipeline, and it has helped us with our time-to-market for a very specific product when we are actually deploying or upgrading."

"Azure Firewall Manager centralizes network security management with a hub and spoke architecture."

More Azure Firewall Manager pros

"We have found the most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud are the firewall and the VPN connection manager. I am not worried about any cyber attacks, the solution is secure and I receive daily summary reports."

"The solution is quite stable. I haven't had issues with it crashing on me. I don't recall running into any bugs or glitches. It's very reliable so far."

"Everything is valuable, especially the SD-WAN tunneling, filtering of email, application, and browsing. Everything has value."

"It is easy to integrate the tool."

"There's a lot of return with FortiGate Cloud - it saves me a lot on configuration time, and there are a lot fewer headaches overall."

"The tool is a mature product, ahead of brands like Sophos, though not quite at the Palo Alto or Checkpoint level. I'd rate it nine out of ten for being cost-effective and offering features similar to high-end options."

"FortiGate is highly stable; it's one of the most powerful tools I've ever used."

"Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is easy to use."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud pros

Cons

"The solution can improve the integration with open-source tools."

"There should be a simple one-click deployment for a firewall, rather than a set of setup instructions that include steps such as the DNS configuration, et cetera."

"With Azure Firewall, the problem is that the NAT-ing still has to be improved."

"The cost is a significant concern because we are in a region where the dollar is not our default currency, and converting to dollars makes it very expensive."

"We could do only one-way NAT-ing, where the traffic comes from outside to internal, to Azure, which is fine. However, when we actually do NAT-ed traffic to hit the firewall, that way is not working."

"For Azure Firewall Manager, the learning curve for new people is a bit challenging, but the integration should be more straightforward for configuring a centralized system."

"Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling deployment, and traffic management, which leads to higher costs."

"The tool's security features need to improve. It needs also to include a monitoring system for logs. It is also complicated to find a query on the Azure firewall."

More Azure Firewall Manager cons

"In the email security modules they have in their UTM, maybe they can include more extended or expanded features for the email security where users can have their own portal login to release blocked emails, as an example."

"The console or demonstration tool could be more user friendly."

"FortiGate Cloud could be improved with increased granularity for our control."

"Technical support is not the greatest. L1 support works exclusively by script, sometimes not even looking at the case to see that the info they subsequently request is already included in the initial info provided when the case was opened."

"We had a problem with external attacks in the previous solution we were using so I'd always like to see additional security around that problem."

"Fortinet FortiGate Cloud could improve security. Some of my customers do not trust on-cloud solutions."

"Reporting is an area that can be enhanced."

"There could be more network-related information like interpretation response. All the flows are limited and related to devices, certificates, and switches."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features."

"The solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services."

"Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is cheaper than VMware and Cisco in the Bangladeshi market. Its pricing is reasonable."

"As with us, our customers need not pay for a license. One brings one's own."

"The product cost varies based on company budgets, but for us, it's reasonably priced considering the value it provides."

"It is expensive."

"It's relatively cheap."

"The license does not include many of the features that are necessary, which means that you have to pay extra for them."

"The price of the product is approximately 10,000 Qatar Riyal ($2,750 USD), and another 10,000 Qatar Riyal for a three-year license."

"The solution is mid-priced when compared to other products."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	51
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Firewall Manager?

The pricing for Azure Firewall Manager is expensive. In our project, we have used both Palo Alto Firewall and Azure Firewall. Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling dep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Firewall Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Firewall Manager?

My customers are using Azure Firewall Manager, so I'm learning from both documentation and practical knowledge. I usually recommend Azure Firewall Manager for projects such as an animal hospital pr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

I am very satisfied with the price and licensing cost of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, rating it an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

It needs to improve the vulnerability that I found recently regarding the single sign-on from Fortinet FortiGate Cloud account. That became a concern for my user. The CVE that was leaked recently a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

I am not a user at this time. I am a system integrator. Mostly firewall and network protection. Rarely with endpoint protection. I can say a partner and reseller, I think.

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Firewall vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 16% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 11% of the time

AlgoSec vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Firewall Manager Competitors

Fortinet FortiManager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 42% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Firewall Manager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

NetFortris Quality of Service vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager

August 2026

Download Azure Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

August 2026

Download Fortinet FortiGate Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

FortiCloud, FortiGate Cloud

Overview

Azure Firewall Manager offers easy configuration, centralized management, and automatic scalability. Its integration with Azure Entra ID provides secure access, while Power BI facilitates centralized monitoring, contributing to its cloud-native benefits and reliable network management.

Azure Firewall Manager is recognized for its efficient security policy management and the ability to configure and test firewall settings across multiple locations. Its integration with Azure Kubernetes supports cloud environment security and the seamless migration of on-premise components to the cloud. With its hub-and-spoke architecture, users can detect threats and orchestrate policies more effectively, although integration with open-source tools and technical support responsiveness could be enhanced. Improvements in NAT capabilities and an AI-driven phishing prevention system would enhance its offering.

What are Azure Firewall Manager's key features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies firewall setup without additional plugins.
Centralized Security Management: Streamlines policy management across locations.
Automatic Scalability: Adjusts resources to meet changing demands seamlessly.
Integration with Azure Entra ID: Provides secure user access control.
Hub and Spoke Architecture: Enables efficient threat detection and policy orchestration.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Cloud-Native Benefits: Offers stability and seamless integration with cloud environments.
Fair Pricing: Competitive cost structure, despite currency conversion challenges.
Simplified Monitoring: Uses Power BI for comprehensive security insights.
Enhanced Security: Protects against phishing and ransomware threats.

Azure Firewall Manager is widely implemented in industries like finance to secure applications and manage B2B interactions. This tool supports endpoint security, traffic management, and seamless orchestrations within cloud environments, ensuring robust protection against various threats.

Microsoft

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers centralized management with advanced security, scalability, and network management capabilities. It simplifies multi-site management with SD-WAN, real-time threat intelligence, and seamless integration, ensuring robust protection.

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is known for delivering extensive network security features, specializing in robust firewall functions and SD-WAN capabilities. It offers real-time threat intelligence, intrusion prevention, and VPN features. Users appreciate the ease of deployment and integration capabilities, making it suitable for managing devices across multiple sites. However, areas such as support, VPN streamlining, and dashboard enhancements require attention to improve usability. Pricing and technical complexity can be challenging, and better third-party integrations are desired.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management with intuitive controls.
SD-WAN Capabilities: Ensures efficient and secure network performance.
Reliable VPN Features: Protects connections with advanced encryption.
Centralized Management: Streamlines control across multiple locations.
Real-Time Threat Intelligence: Provides up-to-date security insights.

What benefits are users finding in Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex network operations.
Effective Policy Control: Enhances security through detailed configurations.
Network Performance: Optimizes traffic management and routing.

Industries implement Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for network security management, serving as a firewall and enabling SD-WAN tunneling. Organizations use it to manage devices and secure cloud as well as on-premises environments. It assists with application filtering, identity management, and integrates with major cloud providers for comprehensive security. System integrators offer it as a managed security service, benefiting companies that need to secure network infrastructures across multiple sites.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

June 2026

Free Report: Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.