"We are happy with this product and have not found any issues while using it."
"The hardware is always updated and it's saved us a lot of money."
"The scalability has been good."
"With a couple of buttons, we can configure a VM for a backup and use the wall service, the storage wall service, pretty seamlessly."
"It's useful, it works, and it's fairly reliable."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that it is easy to create a backup by using Azure Backup. It also has a good user interface and nice features for sending notifications when any backup fails or there is a change in the status of virtual machines."
"The most valuable feature is the ease in which it backs up our data."
"I like that it's a stable solution and their support is good. I think Microsoft's commercial force is superior."
"he most valuable feature is that it's not so intrusive with computer resources."
"We're comfortable using this kind of technology. It's user-friendly."
"The monitoring and tagging features could be improved."
"I once tried restoring a Linux environment, and the size of the Linux VM or the data disk was really huge. It took a really long time to restore the environment and send the data from the storage to the disk. It took around 25 to 30 minutes, which was much longer than I anticipated. They can improve the duration of such restore operations. In the next release, it would also be good if they could reduce the duration for transferring the data from their storage to the actual storage while creating a virtual machine. They can reduce the duration or increase the data transfer rate."
"We would like to see some kind of notification given to the user that a file was not synchronized well or what may have happened."
"Lacks an AI system that would enable easier upgrading of the hardware."
"Technical support can be slow to respond at times."
"I would like to see more automation, integration, and security. The price could be better."
"They need to improve the frequency of the backup. You can only backup one to three times a day. It would be better to back up continuously throughout the day."
"The length of time it takes to restore is our main source of frustration. It would be beneficial to shorten the time it takes."
"An area for improvement is the product's performance, especially how long it takes to do a job."
"When you finish a project, the client should have the opportunity to browse the files rather than simply ending the contract. Also, it's not possible to recover earlier versions. It should be possible to have a database for recovering files after you finish a contract. There's no solution for this from Veritas."
Azure Backup is ranked 13th in Backup and Recovery Software with 12 reviews while Veritas SaaS Backup is ranked 3rd in SaaS Backup with 2 reviews. Azure Backup is rated 8.4, while Veritas SaaS Backup is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Secure, good connectivity, easy to scale, and gives our clients peace of mind". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas SaaS Backup writes "It's a user-friendly solution that helps us migrate our customers from their local servers". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Complete Data Protection, Veritas NetBackup, Acronis Backup and Dell NetWorker, whereas Veritas SaaS Backup is most compared with Veritas NetBackup, Veritas Backup Exec, AWS Backup, Metallic and NetApp AltaVault.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.