Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Axway and Seeburger are both solutions in the API Management category. Axway is ranked #31, while Seeburger is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0. Axway holds a 1.6% mindshare in APIM, compared to Seeburger’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Seeburger users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 12 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

1,674 Views
1,674 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

4,143 Views
994 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) and Axway AMPLIFY API Management compete in the integration and API management market. SEEBURGER seems to have the upper hand in ease of integration and mapping capabilities, while Axway excels in security and API management.

Features: SEEBURGER BIS is noted for its flexibility, ease of integration, and capability to manage multiple protocols on a single platform, alongside powerful mapping capabilities and seamless process automation. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is recognized for its robust security features, exceptional data handling, strong governance functionalities, and API management.

Room for Improvement: SEEBURGER users have indicated challenges with the interface and the need for improved customization in monitoring tools, along with frequent service pack updates. Axway users suggest advancements in its deployment model and scaling support, and quicker customer service response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SEEBURGER offers primarily on-premises deployment with varying support, as some users prefer personalized assistance but express the need for more responsiveness. Axway supports multiple deployment options, including hybrid and public cloud solutions, but users mention inconsistencies in support and expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SEEBURGER's pricing is viewed as mid-tier with flexible licensing options, while some users find it expensive but note significant ROI through efficiencies and automation. Axway offers competitive pricing, especially for its full-access license, with users mentioning the potential for good ROI depending on deployment and usage scale.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,103 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Ranking in API Management

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (4th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (12th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite	1.1%
Axway AMPLIFY API Management	1.6%
Other	97.3%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Akash Dalebehera

Technical Specialist at BT - British Telecom

High level security, handles large volumes of data, and useful filters

The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options. If there was a new release of this solution there should be a feature called "Revision History" or "Version Control" that would allow developers to easily navigate and compare different versions of their API flows within the Amplify API Management toolkit. This would save time and effort by eliminating the need to constantly switch between the toolkit and external Git repositories. Additionally, it would provide an added layer of security by allowing developers to quickly revert back to previous versions if a mistake or issue arises.

Read full review

Shaik Saifuddin

Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech

Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration

The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."

"This product is a ten when it comes to API management."

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."

"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."

"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

"I like that the tool has all the adapters — all the possible protocols that are in the industry. You pay for those adapters but at least it's all in one package. You don't have to get another tool or application to support another partner."

"The platform has been very consistent and responsive."

"SEEBURGER BIS can reconcile documentation, like our accounts payable and statements within the system. If you are manually doing it, then it is really time consuming with a lot of errors. Whereas, SEEBURGER BIS allows for a lot of basic level programming within the documentation, filtering, and sorting out VLOOKUP. It lets us get two database tables from two different systems, then merge them based on the logic that we provide. So, it is a very helpful product."

"It's a very robust solution and it's very configurable. Before this product we would use an ESB-type of solution which required us to write code and go through a process. We can configure the SEEBURGER solution much more easily, instead of writing code... It can handle large files very well."

"Another aspect that we employed in the last year-and-a-half has been their CMA platform component, which hooks to the SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) front end. We've been able to set up an automatic testing process for our partners."

"We use Message Tracking, which is a very good feature. Message Tracking has about 300 to 400 business people who can find documents and ask the integration team about them. For example, they looking for a document that the vendor or trading partner tells them that they sent, but they don't see it in the ERP system yet. So, they go to SEEBURGER Message Tracking, which can tell them if we received it already from the outside and what happened, e.g., if it went to SEEBURGER BIS or if it's already in the ERP system. It's a very simple tool to use. They also can use that tool to see the source document."

"We had a requirement for transferring data to Amazon S3 buckets but we did not have a solution in our shop for large data transfers to Amazon S3. We worked with SEEBURGER and created a framework solution and now, using that solution, we can configure the transfer in an hour or two and enable it to go to existing or new S3 buckets."

"When orders come in they go into our ERP system directly, so there is integration there."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

Cons

"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."

"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."

"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."

"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."

"Team management capabilities could be improved."

"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."

"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."

"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

"The ability to bind a mapping to an agreement seems a bit clunky. It would be nice to have a better way of navigating to a map name rather than using a drop down list."

"Some of the functionality for retriggering documents, where you have to step through a termination process and then retrigger it, versus just being able to restart or retrigger more easily, is a bit challenging, depending on the scenario."

"In some of the other tools out there in the market, you can create one service and use that service without creating a copy. That kind of capability currently doesn't exist in this solution."

"There might be some improvements they could make to the portal, but they're not anything that stops me from working."

"Their traditional model is a vendor flow. We are looking to do a customer-based flow, which which require significant development from SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). We are working with them to do this using their WebEDI. It is a brand new area for them, but it could be an option in the future."

"It's rather difficult to understand, from the application, what's broken and why it doesn't work. We typically need to get support from them directly, and it's usually in a consulting role, to fix issues."

"I find the solution quite confusing to use, especially when looking at the tree structure."

"Java is very old technology and they should move away from it, to anything that's better."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

"We pay maintenance of between $75,000 and $100,000 per year, per box."

"Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle."

"All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want..."

"Sometimes it seems a little pricey, especially when some of the stuff is available through freeware, like SFTP communications... It costs a lot more money to buy this stuff from SEEBURGER but I think it's worth it in the long run."

"The pricing and licensing is very competitive."

"I did a review of other options out there, as we moved into the future and our SAP implementation, that this would be the right solution. It was very comparable to other manage services out there. Thus, there wasn't any clear-cut reason to go in another direction."

"It has a very goofy pricing model in the sense that they have so many components and it's not very clear what components you require to do your work. When you ask for that, you learn that there's a surcharge for them. It's not that you buy a product and you can use all the compatibilities. They have all these different bits and pieces of it and you have to pay extra for all those things."

"The solution provides the flexibility to start small and pay as you grow. SEEBURGER has a lot of offerings..."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,103 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

15%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 8% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 8% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 7% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

February 2026

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

January 2026

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

SEEBURGER BIS

Overview

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

With SEEBURGER’s experienced team behind you, and SEEBURGER BIS as the foundation of your hybrid integration strategy, you’re prepared for whatever comes your way – even as your business gains complexity and integration requirements increase.

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a unified, agile, secure and scalable platform that solves integration challenges across your business and ecosystem, so that you can make valuable connections between clouds, applications and people.

Our platform provides integration across all scenarios, including B2B/EDI, MFT, API and ERP on-premises, in the cloud and hybrid, in addition to expert support that is unmatched in the industry for your simplest to your most complex integrations.

Your APIs are likely multiplying quickly, and if you’re looking for a solution to manage, secure and scale them properly, you get all of the benefits and less of the hassle with our API Management toolkit.

Bring us your toughest B2B/EDI challenges. We help with difficult onboarding and partner connections, and will save you time and effort to complete complex projects. We make B2B easy with pre-packaged, re-usable content and automation capability, so your team can make the connection, and move on to the next mission.

Simplify your workload with our iPaaS solution. SEEBURGER iPaaS enables your team to save man-hours connecting data, applications and systems, by letting us handle all the time-consuming platform operations. We cover maintenance, updates, security, scalability and more.

Did you know that without managed file transfer (MFT), your company is at greater risk for a data breach? It’s as simple, and as dangerous, as that. The security and control you get with our centralized, easy-to-use solution ensures less risk for the company, and more sleep at night for you.

Our customers say it best! Check out our reviews you’ll see that SEEBURGER’s rock-solid, built-from-the-ground-up platform, is combined with an expert team, and stellar service. We power your connections, future-proof your vision and give you a competitive edge.

Seeburger

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

February 2026

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,103 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.