Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Axway and Seeburger are both solutions in the API Management category. Axway is ranked #31, while Seeburger is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0. Axway holds a 1.6% mindshare in APIM, compared to Seeburger’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Seeburger users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 12 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

1,674 Views
1,674 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

4,143 Views
994 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) and Axway AMPLIFY API Management compete in the integration and API management market. SEEBURGER seems to have the upper hand in ease of integration and mapping capabilities, while Axway excels in security and API management.

Features: SEEBURGER BIS is noted for its flexibility, ease of integration, and capability to manage multiple protocols on a single platform, alongside powerful mapping capabilities and seamless process automation. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is recognized for its robust security features, exceptional data handling, strong governance functionalities, and API management.

Room for Improvement: SEEBURGER users have indicated challenges with the interface and the need for improved customization in monitoring tools, along with frequent service pack updates. Axway users suggest advancements in its deployment model and scaling support, and quicker customer service response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SEEBURGER offers primarily on-premises deployment with varying support, as some users prefer personalized assistance but express the need for more responsiveness. Axway supports multiple deployment options, including hybrid and public cloud solutions, but users mention inconsistencies in support and expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SEEBURGER's pricing is viewed as mid-tier with flexible licensing options, while some users find it expensive but note significant ROI through efficiencies and automation. Axway offers competitive pricing, especially for its full-access license, with users mentioning the potential for good ROI depending on deployment and usage scale.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Ranking in API Management

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (4th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (12th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite	1.1%
Axway AMPLIFY API Management	1.6%
Other	97.3%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Akash Dalebehera

Technical Specialist at BT - British Telecom

High level security, handles large volumes of data, and useful filters

The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options. If there was a new release of this solution there should be a feature called "Revision History" or "Version Control" that would allow developers to easily navigate and compare different versions of their API flows within the Amplify API Management toolkit. This would save time and effort by eliminating the need to constantly switch between the toolkit and external Git repositories. Additionally, it would provide an added layer of security by allowing developers to quickly revert back to previous versions if a mistake or issue arises.

Read full review

Shaik Saifuddin

Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech

Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration

The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This platform can be highly scalable."

"In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers."

"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."

"The administration tool for this solution is good."

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

"The solution's capabilities in fulfilling our existing B2B integration requirements are brilliant. Among our multiple customers we connect to SAP systems, JDE, all the various ERPs that you can possibly get, Oracle procurement systems, etc. We haven't come across anything yet — and customers are trying to trip us up — that we can't do."

"It has a lot of basic EDI already established for all the main users. Also, it lets me share setups that I had already set up for my first plant. I was able to use them for my second one which was very helpful. I didn't have to start from scratch for my second facility."

"When orders come in they go into our ERP system directly, so there is integration there."

"In our landscape, we have a lot of AS/400s or iSeries and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) has a file service listener that allows data to seamlessly be transferred between the SEEBURGER solution and the AS/400."

"The product has the ability to handle high volumes of data efficiently."

"We can code in Java, which is really good feature. There is very vast command available, which can be used in mapping."

"The ease of integration of the SEEBURGER product into SAP was pretty seamless. There wasn't any trouble, there weren't any complexities."

"We can use it to script and monitor processes."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

Cons

"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."

"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."

"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."

"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."

"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."

"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."

"The portal still has room for improvement."

"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

"There might be some improvements they could make to the portal, but they're not anything that stops me from working."

"There are a lot of service packs during the year. I know that part is the process for updating features, but sometimes it's difficult to update service packs every month."

"The product is not integrated very well with different cloud providers. We did work with the vendor to build a solution for Amazon, but there is no solution for other cloud providers like Google or Azure. The vendor needs to create adapters so that if we have a requirement to transfer data from our data center to another cloud, outside of Amazon, we would be delighted with that."

"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite does not have an end user or subscriber console which can show the traffic status."

"There are some aspects at the front, the actual queries that you use, that could be improved. They're all very minor to be honest."

"The BIS Front End needs a little bit of refreshing, especially when it comes to setting up new trading partners and trading partner agreements or transactions. It can be a bit clumsy to copy and rename and then go in and modify."

"I don't think the scalability of the solution is that great because they have tied the solution to their named nodes and it does not allow scalability like some of the cloud products allow."

"We wanted to use API. We were told that in 6.52 we could use API management. Later on, we found that API management wasn't that completely integrated into the 6.52 solution, and if you wanted to have the whole API suite you might have to go to 6.7, the latest one."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

"The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business."

"Pricing, compared to the tool that we had earlier, is cheaper."

"I did a review of other options out there, as we moved into the future and our SAP implementation, that this would be the right solution. It was very comparable to other manage services out there. Thus, there wasn't any clear-cut reason to go in another direction."

"The cost of the SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) can be considered high. We have elected to have SEEBURGER consulting do the installation. Licensing could also be considered high. However, one would be hard pressed to find another product that does all that this one does."

"All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want..."

"We pay maintenance of between $75,000 and $100,000 per year, per box."

"I had a problem at one time with their invoicing. I told them, then we worked on the process and improved it. They installed the connection between SAP and SEEBURGER BIS in Europe first. This was awhile ago. When I came along, I became involved in the project and started working with them. Every time that I made a request, the work was done well, but I was not receiving my invoices. I knew I had to pay for the work and was trying to find someone to send me the invoices or a report of what was being done. From that end, it was really not working. After a few years, I was complaining and not happy. At the end of the year, they would come with a long list of invoices to pay, which was really bad. So, I asked for a change. We worked on the process, and since five years ago, I have worked with SEEBURGER based in North America. Now, when I have a question, I know who to contact. They send me a report with invoices every month. They really reacted to my concern, and we improved the process. Since then, I have had no problem."

"Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

15%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 8% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 8% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 7% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

February 2026

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

January 2026

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

SEEBURGER BIS

Overview

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

With SEEBURGER’s experienced team behind you, and SEEBURGER BIS as the foundation of your hybrid integration strategy, you’re prepared for whatever comes your way – even as your business gains complexity and integration requirements increase.

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a unified, agile, secure and scalable platform that solves integration challenges across your business and ecosystem, so that you can make valuable connections between clouds, applications and people.

Our platform provides integration across all scenarios, including B2B/EDI, MFT, API and ERP on-premises, in the cloud and hybrid, in addition to expert support that is unmatched in the industry for your simplest to your most complex integrations.

Your APIs are likely multiplying quickly, and if you’re looking for a solution to manage, secure and scale them properly, you get all of the benefits and less of the hassle with our API Management toolkit.

Bring us your toughest B2B/EDI challenges. We help with difficult onboarding and partner connections, and will save you time and effort to complete complex projects. We make B2B easy with pre-packaged, re-usable content and automation capability, so your team can make the connection, and move on to the next mission.

Simplify your workload with our iPaaS solution. SEEBURGER iPaaS enables your team to save man-hours connecting data, applications and systems, by letting us handle all the time-consuming platform operations. We cover maintenance, updates, security, scalability and more.

Did you know that without managed file transfer (MFT), your company is at greater risk for a data breach? It’s as simple, and as dangerous, as that. The security and control you get with our centralized, easy-to-use solution ensures less risk for the company, and more sleep at night for you.

Our customers say it best! Check out our reviews you’ll see that SEEBURGER’s rock-solid, built-from-the-ground-up platform, is combined with an expert team, and stellar service. We power your connections, future-proof your vision and give you a competitive edge.

Seeburger

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

February 2026

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.