Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Axway and Seeburger are both solutions in the API Management category. Axway is ranked #31, while Seeburger is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0. Axway holds a 1.6% mindshare in APIM, compared to Seeburger’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Seeburger users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 12 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

1,674 Views
1,674 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

4,143 Views
994 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) and Axway AMPLIFY API Management compete in the integration and API management market. SEEBURGER seems to have the upper hand in ease of integration and mapping capabilities, while Axway excels in security and API management.

Features: SEEBURGER BIS is noted for its flexibility, ease of integration, and capability to manage multiple protocols on a single platform, alongside powerful mapping capabilities and seamless process automation. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is recognized for its robust security features, exceptional data handling, strong governance functionalities, and API management.

Room for Improvement: SEEBURGER users have indicated challenges with the interface and the need for improved customization in monitoring tools, along with frequent service pack updates. Axway users suggest advancements in its deployment model and scaling support, and quicker customer service response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SEEBURGER offers primarily on-premises deployment with varying support, as some users prefer personalized assistance but express the need for more responsiveness. Axway supports multiple deployment options, including hybrid and public cloud solutions, but users mention inconsistencies in support and expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SEEBURGER's pricing is viewed as mid-tier with flexible licensing options, while some users find it expensive but note significant ROI through efficiencies and automation. Axway offers competitive pricing, especially for its full-access license, with users mentioning the potential for good ROI depending on deployment and usage scale.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,594 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Ranking in API Management

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (4th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (12th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite	1.1%
Axway AMPLIFY API Management	1.6%
Other	97.3%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Akash Dalebehera

Technical Specialist at BT - British Telecom

High level security, handles large volumes of data, and useful filters

The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options. If there was a new release of this solution there should be a feature called "Revision History" or "Version Control" that would allow developers to easily navigate and compare different versions of their API flows within the Amplify API Management toolkit. This would save time and effort by eliminating the need to constantly switch between the toolkit and external Git repositories. Additionally, it would provide an added layer of security by allowing developers to quickly revert back to previous versions if a mistake or issue arises.

Read full review

Shaik Saifuddin

Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech

Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration

The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."

"This product is a ten when it comes to API management."

"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."

"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."

"This platform can be highly scalable."

"The administration tool for this solution is good."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

"With SEEBURGER BIS, you can string as many different activities together in your workflows as you want. You can put them in any order, like a piece of code. One leads into the next, which leads into the next. It is just very flexible from that vantage point. This makes it so easy to use and reduces the number of moving parts that you need to have. It is just a lot less frustrating not having to conform to how some other vendor software works."

"The solution's capabilities in fulfilling our existing B2B integration requirements are brilliant. Among our multiple customers we connect to SAP systems, JDE, all the various ERPs that you can possibly get, Oracle procurement systems, etc. We haven't come across anything yet — and customers are trying to trip us up — that we can't do."

"The solution is flexible when it comes to adding integrations. It is much easier to use than the other tools we have to move the files. Across the board, we can move files in a short amount of time compared to our other existing tools."

"The stability is world-class. It is as good as any of the other options out there. They have addressed hiccups quickly, professionally, and with an excellent response."

"We can code in Java, which is really good feature. There is very vast command available, which can be used in mapping."

"We use Message Tracking, which is a very good feature. Message Tracking has about 300 to 400 business people who can find documents and ask the integration team about them. For example, they looking for a document that the vendor or trading partner tells them that they sent, but they don't see it in the ERP system yet. So, they go to SEEBURGER Message Tracking, which can tell them if we received it already from the outside and what happened, e.g., if it went to SEEBURGER BIS or if it's already in the ERP system. It's a very simple tool to use. They also can use that tool to see the source document."

"Having the SEEBURGER consulting team perform the installation alleviates a lot of headaches and ensures a stable system."

"SEEBURGER has helped us to enable digital business transformation. Every time we add a new customer, there is a digital footprint. This is no longer a manual process."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

Cons

"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."

"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."

"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."

"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."

"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."

"The portal still has room for improvement."

"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."

"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

"They made improvements to the email error alerts that go out, for the EDI technical. Those typically go straight out to the partners. Those messages are significantly clearer and easy to read. The same messages in the front end are not nearly as clear. It's supposed to be the same error, but the message that goes out for EDI is really easy for anybody to read and understand, but you have to be really solution-savvy to understand the message in the system itself."

"All the topics we've identified have been placed on the SEEBURGER roadmap already... Among the things we have requested are improvements in the user interface and improvements that would be implemented by completely new modules or improvements in their Cloud Services."

"The ability to bind a mapping to an agreement seems a bit clunky. It would be nice to have a better way of navigating to a map name rather than using a drop down list."

"The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new transactions from scratch or performing search queries."

"I would've liked, from day one, to learn how to do my own mapping. That would have saved a lot of time and effort if that had been brought forward earlier. It's there, I just didn't know about it. Also, some tidier, easier-to-use interfaces would help."

"A person whom I work with, and is not very technical, found the setup complex, as there are a lot of steps."

"Java is very old technology and they should move away from it, to anything that's better."

"Providing more training materials, especially when new products are released, would be beneficial."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

"Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle."

"They have options for every budget. You can book Cloud Services, starting with a few hundred Euros per year or month, depending on what you want, or you can even buy huge landscapes and operate them on your own. The pricing is fair compared to others."

"We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them."

"The solution provides the flexibility to start small and pay as you grow. SEEBURGER has a lot of offerings..."

"Pricing, compared to the tool that we had earlier, is cheaper."

"I find the pricing expensive. But I know that when we evaluated another company, it was about the same. That just seems to be the market. It's probably not expensive overall."

"It has a very goofy pricing model in the sense that they have so many components and it's not very clear what components you require to do your work. When you ask for that, you learn that there's a surcharge for them. It's not that you buy a product and you can use all the compatibilities. They have all these different bits and pieces of it and you have to pay extra for all those things."

"All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want..."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

15%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 8% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 8% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 7% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

February 2026

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

January 2026

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

SEEBURGER BIS

Overview

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

With SEEBURGER’s experienced team behind you, and SEEBURGER BIS as the foundation of your hybrid integration strategy, you’re prepared for whatever comes your way – even as your business gains complexity and integration requirements increase.

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a unified, agile, secure and scalable platform that solves integration challenges across your business and ecosystem, so that you can make valuable connections between clouds, applications and people.

Our platform provides integration across all scenarios, including B2B/EDI, MFT, API and ERP on-premises, in the cloud and hybrid, in addition to expert support that is unmatched in the industry for your simplest to your most complex integrations.

Your APIs are likely multiplying quickly, and if you’re looking for a solution to manage, secure and scale them properly, you get all of the benefits and less of the hassle with our API Management toolkit.

Bring us your toughest B2B/EDI challenges. We help with difficult onboarding and partner connections, and will save you time and effort to complete complex projects. We make B2B easy with pre-packaged, re-usable content and automation capability, so your team can make the connection, and move on to the next mission.

Simplify your workload with our iPaaS solution. SEEBURGER iPaaS enables your team to save man-hours connecting data, applications and systems, by letting us handle all the time-consuming platform operations. We cover maintenance, updates, security, scalability and more.

Did you know that without managed file transfer (MFT), your company is at greater risk for a data breach? It’s as simple, and as dangerous, as that. The security and control you get with our centralized, easy-to-use solution ensures less risk for the company, and more sleep at night for you.

Our customers say it best! Check out our reviews you’ll see that SEEBURGER’s rock-solid, built-from-the-ground-up platform, is combined with an expert team, and stellar service. We power your connections, future-proof your vision and give you a competitive edge.

Seeburger

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

February 2026

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.