Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Axway and Seeburger are both solutions in the API Management category. Axway is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0, while Seeburger is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0. Axway holds a 1.6% mindshare in APIM, compared to Seeburger’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Seeburger users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 15 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

2,136 Views
2,115 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

6,052 Views
1,513 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) and Axway AMPLIFY API Management compete in the integration and API management market. SEEBURGER seems to have the upper hand in ease of integration and mapping capabilities, while Axway excels in security and API management.

Features: SEEBURGER BIS is noted for its flexibility, ease of integration, and capability to manage multiple protocols on a single platform, alongside powerful mapping capabilities and seamless process automation. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is recognized for its robust security features, exceptional data handling, strong governance functionalities, and API management.

Room for Improvement: SEEBURGER users have indicated challenges with the interface and the need for improved customization in monitoring tools, along with frequent service pack updates. Axway users suggest advancements in its deployment model and scaling support, and quicker customer service response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SEEBURGER offers primarily on-premises deployment with varying support, as some users prefer personalized assistance but express the need for more responsiveness. Axway supports multiple deployment options, including hybrid and public cloud solutions, but users mention inconsistencies in support and expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SEEBURGER's pricing is viewed as mid-tier with flexible licensing options, while some users find it expensive but note significant ROI through efficiencies and automation. Axway offers competitive pricing, especially for its full-access license, with users mentioning the potential for good ROI depending on deployment and usage scale.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Ranking in API Management

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (4th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Axway AMPLIFY API Management	1.6%
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite	1.4%
Other	97.0%

API Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2081667

Associate Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized gateway has strengthened API security and provides deep traffic analytics

Potential areas of improvement or lack of functions in Axway AMPLIFY API Management is a challenging question because even after working for almost six years, I have not been able to touch everything this tool offers. This tool is very comprehensive and useful. However, from my opinion, when there are different dashboards on which the API platform shows monitoring, I expect Axway AMPLIFY API Management to be more visible in terms of showing pre-historic data. In other words, if there is a very large volume or very large number of transactions going on live in production, sometimes it purges the previous data very quickly, leaving only one or two hours of data. When there is very low volume, it can sustain data up to five days. The visibility of the previous historic database is a feature that could be improved. Different tools can be used to empower this capability, such as Splunk or the ELK stack, which includes Elastic. There are different features that could be used, but Axway as an organization would likely implement their specific products. I am simply providing a very basic opinion anonymously and do not want to sound like I am against this organization.

Read full review

Shaik Saifuddin

Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech

Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration

The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"Axway is a good product according to Gartner which is why we started to adopt it."

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"The UI and UX are quite good and easy to understand."

"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."

"The most useful features in Axway AMPLIFY API Management, in my opinion, primarily involve the security aspect of the product, which provides us very good methods of securing the network."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

"The ease of integration of the SEEBURGER product into SAP was pretty seamless. There wasn't any trouble, there weren't any complexities."

"SEEBURGER BIS is all one product, all homegrown, and everything is fully integrated."

"If SEEBURGER plans to do something, they will meet their target. We haven't been disappointed by them at all. For example, we had six trading partners to onboard and they said, "We'll make it happen," and they did make it happen. They did exactly what they said they would do. That's a really positive thing."

"Because of the ease of use of the tool and the capabilities that the tool provides, we reduced the human resources that we used to need to support the previous tools."

"One of the most valuable features is the option to have all integration patterns constantly updated in one platform. That is the main strength I see in using SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). It means I can use a very old-fashioned pattern, combined with a very modern pattern. There are no limitations in terms of combining components because all the components simply fit together."

"What would have been a manual process of transmitting data items around between us and third-parties has been automated. SEEBURGER BIS handles the automation and mapping side of the communications. The automation, along with the efficiency around time and cost, has improved our organization. Around 20,000 messages a month have been automated. These typically would be financial/order transactions and confirmations in invoicing that have been automated."

"In our landscape, we have a lot of AS/400s or iSeries and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) has a file service listener that allows data to seamlessly be transferred between the SEEBURGER solution and the AS/400."

"This solution has reduced it down to an average of six days, with zero backlog."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

Cons

"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."

"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."

"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."

"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."

"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."

"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."

"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

"It's rather difficult to understand, from the application, what's broken and why it doesn't work."

"I would've liked, from day one, to learn how to do my own mapping. That would have saved a lot of time and effort if that had been brought forward earlier. It's there, I just didn't know about it. Also, some tidier, easier-to-use interfaces would help."

"I don't think the scalability of the solution is that great because they have tied the solution to their named nodes and it does not allow scalability like some of the cloud products allow."

"There are a few capabilities that have come out a little late. TIBCO introduced its container edition way back; SEEBURGER is only in the initial phase of 6.7 and they are a little slow in releasing newer features."

"We had issues with stability. The system is not always stable and you could have a problem at any time without notice."

"We don't have much access to the logs or what's happening. So we have to log a ticket with SEEBURGER. We only get a message that something has failed... we have to open a ticket with SEEBURGER for them to tell us exactly what the issue is... I would like us to be able to be more self-sufficient."

"They have their own private cloud. That's the reason we did not go ahead with managing everything by ourselves or moving into the cloud."

"Their technical support is okay. It doesn't blow you away."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

"Price and licensing are comparable to other systems. It's well-priced and simple. It's not user-based or anything. It's just per seat, per system. So, it's pretty straight forward. Because it's per system, one system is enough. However, if you want to make it larger, then you can grow with it."

"Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle."

"They need to be more competitively priced. When it comes to training, they need to lower their prices. It shouldn't be so specific. Maybe they should outsource training to another company. From what I can see, their training is pretty expensive, and they don't do anything for free."

"Pricing, compared to the tool that we had earlier, is cheaper."

"We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them."

"The way they have their licensing structure set up, they have a lot of different modules. For us, we did not really know if we were licensed for certain things or not. We had to reach out to them multiple times to tell them that we were looking for this or that capability. We had to buy licenses for different things at different points in time, not knowing that we could have it bundled initially."

"The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business."

"The pricing and licensing is very competitive."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

Regarding pricing for Axway AMPLIFY API Management, I cannot say definitively because it depends on the transactional volume expected by customers. I would not be able to give the final answer, but...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

I am currently working on Axway AMPLIFY API Management, which is the Axway API platform. The main requirement for API management is that the API platform provides security to the different APIs whi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 8% of the time

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

webMethods.io vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

May 2026

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

April 2026

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

SEEBURGER BIS

Overview

Axway AMPLIFY API Management offers secure and user-friendly API management solutions supporting flexible deployment options while ensuring robust security for data exchange and centralized management for developers.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management emphasizes strong security measures against threats, facilitating authenticated data exchange. Its centralized management tools enable efficient API analytics and portal usage. The platform's flexible deployment options, including on-premise and cloud solutions, are coupled with a user-friendly interface featuring drag-and-drop functionalities to streamline operations. However, improvements are needed in Amplify Central portal, customization features, and scalability options. While used primarily as an API gateway for internet, web, and REST APIs, companies leverage its features to create secure connections and integrate APIs internally and externally, fostering a comprehensive API ecosystem.

What are the key features of Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

Security: Offers comprehensive protection against threats with authenticated data exchanges.
Centralized Management: Streamlines developer tasks with efficient API analytics and portal management.
Flexibility: Provides on-premise and cloud deployment options to suit operational needs.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Simplifies operations and enhances efficiency.
Governance and Policy Creation: Effective tools for managing policies and ensuring high performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficiency: Centralized tools streamline operations and improve management efficiency.
Scalability: Supports substantial data volumes efficiently despite needing improvements.
Security: Ensures secure and authenticated data exchanges for peace of mind.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates seamless connections with communication partners.
Hybrid-Cloud Capabilities: Leverages hybrid-cloud environments for a robust API ecosystem.

In the financial services industry, Axway AMPLIFY API Management is integral in creating secure marketplaces and ensuring reliable communication among partners. Its robust security and hybrid-cloud capabilities make it ideal for creating sophisticated API ecosystems, facilitating both internal and external integrations essential for modern operations.

Axway

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a versatile platform supporting multiple integration patterns with rich adapters and easy Java coding, known for fault tolerance and seamless SAP integration.

SEEBURGER offers extensive EDI capabilities and adaptability across protocols. The platform provides tools for entity flow, data mapping, message tracking, and high-volume performance. Appreciated for reliability, scalability, and automation, it enables independent adaptation, maintaining stability in efficient data communication. However, handling large datasets can be challenging. Users desire improved cloud and API integration, enhanced error handling, and more accessible training resources. Frequent updates and new features are valued, but customization can be slow, and support experiences are inconsistent.

What are the most important features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Flexible Integration: Supports multiple integration patterns and protocols.
Rich Adapter Suite: Extensive adapter options available.
Seamless SAP Integration: Enables smooth SAP processes.
EDI Capabilities: Comprehensive electronic data interchange support.
Fault Tolerance: Maintains stability and reliable operation.
Entity Flow Tools: Provides detailed data mapping and message tracking.

What benefits may organizations look for in reviews when evaluating SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Reliability: Ensures consistent performance across platforms.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data and organizational needs.
Automation: Reduces need for programming expertise.
Protocol Adaptability: Supports diverse communication standards.

In industries, SEEBURGER is used for EDI transactions, partner communication, and data integration. Organizations benefit from scripting, process monitoring, certifications, and secure transfers like AS2 and SFTP, facilitating data conversion and internal connections. Implemented on-premises and in the cloud, SEEBURGER adapts to custom business processes.

Seeburger

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

April 2026

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.