We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,"
"If hackers try to insert bugs, the tool blocks it."
"It's simple, easy to use."
"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to limit access based on geographical location by restricting specific IP addresses."
"AWS WAF is something that someone from a cloud background or cloud security background leverages. If they want to natively use a solution in the cloud, AWS WAF comes in handy. It's very useful for that, and the way we can fine-tune the WAF rules is also nice."
"The ease of deployment of the product is valuable to me."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"The default content policy available in the tool is not very strong compared to the competitors."
"For now, there is no feature to protect against attack of the bad bots"
"The product must provide more features."
"The serverless product from AWS WAF could be improved. For example, they have only one serverless series, Lambda, but they should extend and improve it. Additionally, the firewall rules are not very easy to configure."
"The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on."
"It would be good if the solution provided managed WAF services."
"AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use."
"I believe there is a need to move towards real-time analysis with the help of AI and intelligent systems in the future. This would reduce the reliance on manual work and enhance the functionality of detection protection. By incorporating AI-driven data analysis and data science techniques, we can improve the solution's user-friendliness, security compatibility, and accuracy."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall and Radware DefensePro.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.