We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Informatica Enterprise Data Lake based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."The solution is stable and reliable."
"AWS Glue is fast and managed by AWS. Hence, you don't have to worry about capacity and the performance of Glue jobs. It has integrations with other data stores of AWS. The product offers metadata management, logging, and ETL processing capabilities. It comes with a powerful feature, Glue Studio, which helps to do queries interactively within the community. It is a managed service and very secure. Another popular and mature service is S3."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"The solution is serverless so it allows us to transform data while optimizing the cost and performance of Spark jobs."
"The most valuable feature for me is the visual interface of AWS Glue."
"Data catalog and triggers are the two best features for me. AWS Glue has its own data catalog, which makes it great and really easy to use. Triggers are also really good for scheduling the ETL process."
"The key role for Glue is that it hosts our metadata before rolling out our actual data. This is the major advantage of using this solution and our clients client have been very satisfied with it."
"Its user interface is quite good. You just need to choose some options to create a job in AWS Glue. The code-generation feature is also useful. If you don't want to customize it and simply want to read a file and store the data in the database, it can generate the code for you."
"The process of using the tool's scalability option is well documented."
"In terms of performance, if they can further optimize the execution time for serverless jobs, it would be a welcome improvement."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"The solution's visual ETL tool is of no use for actual implementation."
"If there's a cluster-related configuration, we have to make worker notes, which is quite a headache when processing a large amount of data."
"The solution could be cheaper. The price of the solution is an area that needs improvement."
"The technical support for this solution could be improved. In future, we would like to connect more services like Athena or Kinesis to help control more loads of data."
"The mapping area and the use of the data catalog from Glue could be better."
"I would like to see a more robust interface on the no-code side. This would be nice to be able to split cells."
"Informatica Enterprise Data Lake's setup process was complex since it doesn't support a lot of real-time systems."
More Informatica Enterprise Data Lake Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Informatica Enterprise Data Lake is ranked 41st in Data Integration with 1 review. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Informatica Enterprise Data Lake is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Enterprise Data Lake writes "A scalable tool that needs a lot of maintenance due to its unstable nature". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas Informatica Enterprise Data Lake is most compared with Palantir Foundry.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.