AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Precisely are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.4, while Precisely is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.6% mindshare in DRS, compared to Precisely’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Precisely users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 17 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

1,577 Views
473 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Read 2 Precisely Assure QuickEDD reviews

487 Views
477 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Precisely Assure QuickEDD compete in the disaster recovery market. AWS holds an upper hand with integration and scalability advantages, whereas Precisely is preferred for specialized needs.

Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides seamless cloud integration, automated recovery, and scalability. Precisely Assure QuickEDD features real-time replication, cross-platform capabilities, and specialized support for complex legacy systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers cloud-native deployment with extensive support in the AWS ecosystem. Precisely Assure QuickEDD requires more setup and expertise but provides targeted support for specific infrastructural needs.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers flexible pricing with positive ROI for cloud implementations. Precisely Assure QuickEDD has a higher upfront cost but delivers ROI in environments needing detailed data consistency and integrity, offering value in complex settings.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (25th), Cloud Backup (18th)

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 1.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Managed services with seamless integration and good reliability

Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status. I have to calculate whether my data is replicated to the Adarabad region or not. These features, if available in AWS, would be beneficial.

Read full review

reviewer2325741

Director of Information Technology at a construction company with 1-10 employees

Trustworthy and provides good availability

Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over. It could be more of a knowledge transfer situation that didn't happen, but we didn't know if it was easy to use. Precisely Assure QuickEDD is deployed on the cloud in our organization. The implementation of QLED helped us with our recovery time objective and was a seamless transition. In order to utilize the product to its fullest potential, users should be knowledgeable of what it offers. They should also form a relationship with the person who is their representative. Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides our disaster recovery solution. It works fine in our tests."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a robust and reliable solution for disaster recovery needs."

"What I like about ECR AWS is that it is a fully managed service, so I don't need to manage the underlying infrastructure or worry about scalability in AWS concerning building, maintenance, security, and high availability."

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

"I appreciate the automated orchestration of recovery processes in this solution, especially integration with Route 53 and automatically using Route 53 to switch to a different region directly."

"The solution is dependent on the network bandwidth. For example, if they have a bandwidth of 10Mbps the solution will run a little heavier. If the bandwidth is good the solution runs well."

"The initial setup is really straightforward."

"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

"Synchronous applications are valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system."

Cons

"The bandwidth is a constant upload communication to the AWS DR environment, so if you do not have the proper bandwidth, it will definitely eat up your internet line."

"The product could be improved by incorporating more AI-driven automation for deployment and additional security features. These enhancements would make the solution even more user-friendly and secure."

"The UI could be a little sleeker."

"I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time."

"The only thing I would like to see is, they don't have a formal ticketing system. There is no way I can go back and see what questions we had six months back, what issues we had, and how they were resolved."

"The failback could be improved. It should be more intuitive."

"In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull."

"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

"There should be more interactive dashboards."

"Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive. The cost varies based on your requirements. If you want to manage it, there is an extra cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Government

Computer Software Company

26%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The setup is actually managed by our partner. I have taken a rate of per user. Licensing is completely managed by the partner. I am paying per user and per GB storage cost, while the infrastructure...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

I don't think there is any bad feature in AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery as such. It's more of when you do disaster recovery, you think of it more holistically. You want flexibility in terms of opti...

See all answers

What do you like most about Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

We used Precisely Assure QuickEDD for our backups.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 30% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 15% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 12% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Compared 100% of the time

More Precisely Assure QuickEDD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

August 2025

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

August 2025

Download Precisely Assure QuickEDD product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Syncsort Assure QuickEDD, Syncsort Quick-EDD/HA, Quick-EDD/HA

Overview

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Protecting critical IBM i applications from downtime and guarding against data loss with simple, scalable, full-featured high availability and disaster recovery products

Precisely

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Toyota Material Handling Australia, Westpac Pacific Banking, Symphony Health, Wimbledon, OCBC Bank

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

July 2025

Free Report: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.