

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery compete in data protection and recovery. Dell seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features for comprehensive data protection.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides efficient failover and failback processes, seamless integration with AWS infrastructure, and competitive pricing. Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery offers advanced threat detection, isolated recovery environments, and strong data security and integrity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is deployed easily within AWS environments with strong service support. Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery involves a more complex deployment due to its advanced security features and tailored customer service.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is cost-effective for AWS users aiming for maximized ROI with lower initial setup costs. Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery requires higher initial investment but offers comprehensive security benefits with potential long-term ROI gains.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
The biggest return on investment for me when using Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery is that if we had an attack, we would be able to recover in hours instead of weeks or months, which is a lot of risk reduction.
It is possible to observe ROI with Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery because the costs incurred from paying ransoms or decrypting data will be much higher than the solution price itself, providing customers with confidence in their last line of defense.
The biggest return on investment when using Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery comes from its ransomware protection feature.
The customer support is amazing, and it is the best customer support I have ever had.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
I would rate technical support and customer support a 10 because honestly, their support specialists go above and beyond.
We have an account manager for enterprise solutions and local on-site support with a resident engineer positioned on-site.
Every time I have a call, they have a solution.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 10 out of 10.
The ability to recover, ability to air gap it, and ability to replicate it have all worked very well for us.
In terms of scalability with Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, it revolves around the same concept as Data Domain where you can scale up or scale out.
Currently, my Cyber Recovery satisfies my data needs, with my data domain actually sized around 40% larger than it needed to be, in order to predict the available growth of the data I am bringing into the vault.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
The stability and reliability of Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery are very good, as we have not had any outages on it.
Until now, I have not experienced any downtime, crashes, or performance issues with Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery because we have a support contract with Dell.
When we assess the stability and reliability of Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, I would rate it on a scale of zero to ten as being between nine and ten, if not nine point five.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
Because the replication is continuous and block-level, if a production server is hit by ransomware, the encrypted garbage data is often replicated to the DR site in near-real time.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to deploy an AI model inside the vault for more accuracy and faster restoration by scanning the data for any anomalies or unusual behavior.
I would like more visibility into what is going on with the individual backup images and how they are being scanned.
My main problem is with the bare-metal recovery.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
pricing is fair, and you pay for the use.
I do not consider Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery to be expensive as it provides value relative to the ransom that would need to be paid to restore data and the difficulties faced after an attack.
When you are hit by a ransomware attack, even the backup itself and the storage itself will be encrypted completely by the ransomware.
Regarding pricing, I find it a lot cheaper than Veeam.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
The second advantage is restoration, as I can guarantee that the data inside the vault will be clean and can be restored quickly using a golden copy that has been identified as clean.
The main function of cyber recovery, which I find important, is the air gap protection, and that is the most important capability we are using against ransomware protection.
It helps my IT infrastructure be more secure mainly because we have replication of the backups on two physical sites, which is a plus.


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery delivers advanced data protection and cyber resilience by isolating critical data to secure it against cyber threats.
Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery leverages an isolated recovery vault to ensure critical business data remains secure and recoverable even during cyberattacks. Its AI-driven analytics validate data integrity, allowing confidence in the reliability of backups. This approach facilitates rapid restoration of operations, helping maintain business continuity amidst cyber threats.
What are the most important features of Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery?Industries such as finance, healthcare, and government benefit significantly from Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery. These sectors require stringent data protection and are vulnerable to cyber threats. By implementing Dell's solution, they enhance data security and ensure operational continuity, mitigating risks associated with cyberattacks.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.