AWS Direct Connect vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Cisco are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.9, while Cisco is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.8% mindshare in EIV, compared to Cisco’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

AWS Direct Connect

Read 12 AWS Direct Connect reviews

1,065 Views
1,033 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Read 50 Cisco IOS SSL VPN reviews

1,730 Views
1,505 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Direct Connect

Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Cisco IOS SSL VPN and AWS Direct Connect compete in the networking solutions category. AWS Direct Connect has the upper hand due to its performance and integration capabilities.

Features: Cisco IOS SSL VPN offers comprehensive security measures, ease of access management, and strong support. AWS Direct Connect provides high reliability, seamless integration with AWS services, and superior performance features.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Cisco IOS SSL VPN should enhance its scalability options, improve user documentation, and streamline updates. AWS Direct Connect could improve the initial setup process, enhance customer support responsiveness, and refine deployment procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS SSL VPN boasts straightforward deployment processes and responsive customer service but has cumbersome updates. AWS Direct Connect is seen as more complex to deploy initially, but operates efficiently post-deployment with slower customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco IOS SSL VPN is valued for reasonable setup costs and clear ROI from enhanced security. AWS Direct Connect has higher initial costs, but offers long-term value through performance and integration, providing satisfactory ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Direct Connect vs. Cisco IOS SSL VPN Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Direct Connect vs. Cisco IOS SSL VPN

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Direct Connect

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SSL VPN (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of AWS Direct Connect is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco IOS SSL VPN is 2.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco IOS SSL VPN	2.7%
AWS Direct Connect	1.8%
Other	95.5%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

reviewer2231871

Product Manager at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees

Offers secure high-bandwidth connectivity without internet-related risks

Regarding the benefits from the multiple virtual interfaces in the product, there is no interface for the product; it is just a connection that we have. It is an ethernet connection we offer. The customer, from the customer side to AWS, receives an ethernet point-to-point connection, and that is it. The interface and everything along with the communication with AWS, the customer has to do by themselves to build the routes and everything. The connection speed that our clients are using ranges from 100 megabits up to 10 gigabits. The main concern is the port costs. Clients do not report technical problems, so it is mainly always an issue of money. The solution is nice, but sometimes they avoid it because the port costs are high. This is not a problem AWS has exclusively; Azure has the same costs, and these port costs are quite expensive. I would rate this review as an 8 out of 10.

Read full review

Viktor Masnyy

student at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Cost efficiency and ease of setup define network management while potential improvements in complexity handling are noted

Optimizing and configuring for network segmentation is the biggest thing for helping with segmenting traffic management. Configuring QoS on Linksys is pretty easy, especially compared to Cisco QoS, which I am certified in, as it helps ensure that the bandwidth for voice or other applications doesn't bleed over into the data links. In the past, Linksys has been pretty good at network protection, segmenting off that protection for unauthorized access or cyber threats. Cost savings and ease of use are the benefits I've seen from Linksys. It's a little bit less complex to set up and configure compared to Cisco switching. I utilized the VLAN support feature in the Linksys switches. A lot of the networks I have were broken up by VLAN, and I definitely configured them for different VLANs. The best feature of Linksys in my opinion is cost, as they tend to be more cost-effective compared to larger switches or Cisco switches.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most valuable feature for us is its robust network performance."

"AWS Direct Connect provides a secure and encrypted connection over the internet."

"AWS Direct Connect allows me to connect our on-premise infrastructure directly with AWS infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature of Direct Connect is its low latency to the users."

"It is a highly scalable solution."

"AWS VPN is cost-effective and affordable; it has the security regulation with 3DES protocol, and they have the security protocol required to encrypt the information in the link."

"Direct Connect provides an improved connection quality and a diversified link, which contributes to high availability and failover capabilities."

"AWS Direct Connect allows me to connect our on-premise infrastructure directly with AWS infrastructure."

More AWS Direct Connect pros

"The most valuable features are that it's reliable, convenient, and easy. It always works if configured well."

"The product is very stable."

"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is reasonably priced, and its technology is flexible."

"Cisco support has been very helpful."

"The solution is very easy to work with; this is its most valuable feature, and they also did a good job surrounding how you configure the devices."

"The solution is very stable."

"We primarily use this solution as browser and I like that you don't need a username or password to browse."

"It is very effective and I am satisfied with how it works and with its performance."

More Cisco IOS SSL VPN pros

Cons

"There is no room for improvement in Direct Connect right now."

"The platform's stability needs improvement."

"It is complicated to do additional BGP configuration for the product."

"Having more locations could improve the convenience of using the service."

"I would like to see better traffic visibility and higher throughput security, especially for organizations that require more than what the current limit allows."

"It would be good if we could connect AWS Direct Connect from different networks."

"AWS Direct Connect should support cross-cloud connections, such as migrations between Azure and AWS, for disaster recovery purposes on different cloud platforms."

"One area that needs improvement is the cost of the ports, which is a concern as these charges are quite high."

More AWS Direct Connect cons

"Sometimes the connection drops, and we don't like that. I'm not sure the reason, but sometimes it will take time to connect or it will disconnect fast."

"I believe Cisco could support easier configuration and having tools that allow for easier management and configuration, as Linksys switches are a little bit easier to manage and set up compared to Cisco switches."

"Cisco IOS SSL VPN doesn't support the configuration of multiple VPNs."

"The system needs to be upgraded to replace the Token Authentication software, which will no longer be supported."

"The performance could be improved."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution takes some time to log in because of some unavoidable security barriers, but it would be better if that could happen faster."

"It would be nice if we could use this not just on mobile, but on laptops and desktops as well."

More Cisco IOS SSL VPN cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"It has reasonable pricing in terms of the features offered."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Cisco IOS SSL VPN."

"The licensing cost of the solution is on a yearly basis, and it is expensive compared to other solutions in the market."

"FortiGate does not charge the client a licensing fee, although Cisco charges clients a couple of dollars per year for each license."

"The product costs less."

"My company makes payments on a quarterly basis to the vendor to cover the licensing costs attached to the product. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is an expensive product. There are no additional costs apart from the licensing costs attached to the product."

"It stands as the priciest solution available in the market."

"The solution is reasonably priced, and we have around 50% to 60% discounts from Cisco."

"The platform is expensive."

More Cisco IOS SSL VPN pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

University

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AWS Direct Connect?

One area that needs improvement is the cost of the ports, which is a concern as these charges are quite high. It is primarily a budget issue because while the solution is effective, the port costs ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Direct Connect?

Our customers primarily use AWS Direct Connect for hybrid cloud solutions. They have parts of their equipment in their on-premise data center, while also using AWS infrastructure for backups, datab...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering AWS Direct Connect?

See all answers

What do you like most about Cisco IOS SSL VPN?

The solution is pretty fast.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco IOS SSL VPN?

I am not sure about the pricing of Cisco IOS SSL VPN.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco IOS SSL VPN?

I have not found any areas that could be improved so far. I am not sure how Cisco IOS SSL VPN can continue their improvements for the future, but I think it is a great product. To stay on top, they...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Direct Connect

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs AWS Direct Connect

Compared 16% of the time

Sangfor SSL VPN vs AWS Direct Connect

Compared 9% of the time

AWS PrivateLink vs AWS Direct Connect

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs AWS Direct Connect

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS Direct Connect Competitors

OpenVPN Access Server vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Compared 20% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Compared 8% of the time

Sangfor SSL VPN vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Compared 8% of the time

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Compared 8% of the time

Array AG Series vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco IOS SSL VPN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

February 2026

Download AWS Direct Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco IOS SSL VPN

March 2026

Download Cisco IOS SSL VPN product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cisco SSL VPN

Overview

AWS Direct Connect offers low-latency, reliable connectivity with secure data transfers between on-premise infrastructures and AWS environments. It ensures high availability and cost-effectiveness for large data transfers, integrating seamlessly with existing systems.

AWS Direct Connect is recognized for its robust network and security, providing minimal latency and reliable connectivity. It seamlessly integrates with on-premise infrastructure, enabling secure and fast data transfers. Users benefit from its high availability and low maintenance, making it cost-effective for large data transfers. Multi-account environment support is a key feature. Despite a complex configuration process compared to cloud GUIs, it enhances security by avoiding public internet exposure. Room for improvement includes the setup of credentials and terminology, upgrade process, BGP configuration, multi-network connections, traffic visibility, stability, and throughput security. Expanding data center locations and cross-cloud connections can be advantageous. Promotion is necessary for awareness. Some report VPN connection issues while some are content with its performance.

What are the key features of AWS Direct Connect?

Secure Connectivity: Enhances security by avoiding public internet exposure
Low Latency: Provides minimal latency for fast data transfers
High Availability: Ensures continuous connectivity with low maintenance
Cost-Effective: Reduces costs for large data transfers and multi-account environments
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with on-premise infrastructure

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Reliability: Sturdy and consistent connectivity minimizes downtime
Efficient Data Transfers: Cost reduction and efficiency for large data volumes
Security: Avoids exposure to the public internet, enhancing data protection
Resource Integration: Facilitates hybrid cloud environments by integrating on-premises and cloud resources

In industries like finance, healthcare, and media, AWS Direct Connect is implemented to ensure secure and efficient connectivity between on-premises data centers and AWS environments. It supports operations like database management and application deployment, facilitating data and application migration while enabling hybrid cloud connectivity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cisco SSL VPN solutions help you easily and securely extend the network to users who have access to the Internet and a web browser. You can customize access and extend the reach of your corporate network to individuals based on their roles, including teleworker contractors and business partners.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

MST Systems

Buyer's Guide

AWS Direct Connect vs. Cisco IOS SSL VPN

March 2026

Free Report: AWS Direct Connect vs. Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Direct Connect vs. Cisco IOS SSL VPN and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Direct Connect vs. Cisco IOS SSL VPN report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.