We performed a comparison between Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about Pulse Secure, Citrix, Cisco and others in SSL VPN.
Sangfor SSL VPN provides support for remote user to access the enterprise network from anywhere as long as you are connected to the Internet. Remote access is provided through a Secure Socket Layer (SSL) enabled by a SSL VPN gateway. The SSL VPN gateway allows remote users to establish a secure Virtual Private Network (VPN) tunnel using a web browser. This feature provides a comprehensive solution that allows easy access to a broad range of web resources and web-enabled applications (e.g.: Easy Connect) using native HTTP over SSL (HTTPS) browser support.
Sangfor SSL VPN provides SSL VPN remote-access connectivity from almost any Internet-enabled location using a web browser or a APP that natively support SSL encryption. This feature allows your Company to extend access to its secure enterprise network to any authorized user by providing remote-access connectivity to corporate resources.
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is ranked 3rd in SSL VPN with 7 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 8th in SSL VPN. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is rated 8.6, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco IOS SSL VPN writes "An excellent brand with good support". On the other hand, Cisco IOS SSL VPN is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Citrix Gateway, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, Fortinet FortiClient, Check Point Remote Access VPN and Citrix Gateway.
We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.