AWS Device Farm vs HeadSpin comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
1,384 views|756 comparisons
HeadSpin Logo
604 views|347 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Device Farm and HeadSpin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Mobile App Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. HeadSpin Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution.""I rate the stability an eight out of ten."

More AWS Device Farm Pros →

"The most valuable feature is that this is the first connected intelligence all-in-one platform.""The most valuable feature of HeadSpin it's the integration with other solutions. It is great. I can search for an element or do a quick debugging on the application right on HeadSpin. It's very useful.""It has an interesting feature called AV box testing. A lot of companies that are in the OTT segment don't really understand what their streaming is like. They can't test for streaming quality. There are restrictions where you cannot simulate live streaming. For example, on Netflix, you can't simulate how a movie is being streamed on a remote device. That's why HeadSpin has got this AV box testing feature. It is a patented feature. They send an AV box to your location, and you can test live streaming, which is something that no other company does.""The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to. We can use Zoom or Google Meet to interact with them directly, and if there is an issue in our system, they will help us by reproducing the issue in their machines and trying to figure out a solution. The support is really smooth, and we like that they're very supportive.""The most valuable features of the product are the performance parameters it gives us.""The initial setup of HeadSpin was very easy and user-friendly. It was easy to configure and write a script."

More HeadSpin Pros →

Cons
"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved.""An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

More AWS Device Farm Cons →

"They should automate their onboarding. A lot of things are still manual. They can create a video assistant or something like that to completely automate the entire process.""Sometimes, devices go offline and some features are not functioning on some devices, specifically on iOS.""If you want to do some testing or check the devices manually or check the application in a particular device manually, it is really laggy. That's a disappointment because sometimes we would like to do manual testing when our local devices are not available.""HeadSpin needs to improve the hardware. With the mobile, the battery life reduces and must be continuously charged.""HeadSpin could improve on the user interface because it is very poor. The checks that are done on the iOS devices are very difficult, but for Android, it runs great. For all iOS devices, the user interface and how it interacts with the device are very poor.""Support and pricing could be improved."

More HeadSpin Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."
  • More AWS Device Farm Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions."
  • "It has a yearly license. There is no other option. It is expensive. There are a lot of other cheaper players in the market, but it is like a Mercedes. You pay an extra premium for it, but you get the benefits. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing. Companies that are low on funds or new-age can do with pricing that is easily digestible. They can give them a pricing model for three months. They can provide a startup package."
  • "I believe the licensing cost is cheap because it's a total solution, hardware, license and software."
  • "We have a yearly license for 16 devices."
  • More HeadSpin Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I rate the stability an eight out of ten.
    Top Answer:AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot… more »
    Top Answer:It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved. Whenever we upload our Zip files to that particular platform, you know, it takes quite some time, especially if the file is… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the product are the performance parameters it gives us.
    Top Answer:We have a yearly license for 16 devices costing 35 - 40 lakhs in rupees.
    Top Answer:HeadSpin would benefit by adding code coverage. On the front end, when we execute our automation or do a manual change, we don't know what percentage of the code has been tested. If HeadSpin could… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    1,384
    Comparisons
    756
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    823
    Rating
    6.5
    7th
    Views
    604
    Comparisons
    347
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    579
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

    Headspin is a data science-driven Mobile APM platform that leverages an AI platform to combine global device infrastructure, test automation, machine learning-driven performance, and quality of experience analytics. HeadSpin was founded to answer the demand for a global testing, performance monitoring, and quality of experience (QoE) management platform to assist businesses in ensuring optimal digital experiences across mobile, audio, online, and video delivery channels.

    Headspin facilitates seamless collaboration between product managers, SREs, developers, QA/release engineers, and support staff to:

    • Quicken development times using intelligent automation in test and production.
    • Optimize digital performance across devices, networks, and apps.
    • Automate insights discovery with practical, context-aware AI and analytics.

    Headspin Features

    Headspin has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Global device infrastructure allows end-to-end monitoring and testing with thousands of devices in numerous locations on real carrier and WiFi networks around the world. SDK is not required.
    • Test automation and APIs integrate into CI/CD workflows to enable functional and performance testing pre and post release. Support for all testing frameworks.
    • Performance, QoE, and machine learning automatically expose issues and points to underlying root causes across all layers of the stack, from quantifying audio/video quality of experience to code and packet visibility.
    • Insights-to-actions delivers regression and aggregation insights throughout the digital experience lifecycle. These insights take you from planning and development to troubleticketing and operations. Trending, alerts, and analytics.

    More features include:

    • Hosted Device Cloud
    • On-prem Device Appliance
    • Performance & Experience Analytics
    • Professional Services & Support
    • Education, Certification & Training

    Headspin Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Headspin. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Use data science to identify problems and root cause analysis
    • Empower QA and DevOps teams with data science insights and test automation
    • Global teams can work together using remote access
    • Capture performance and UX issues

    Reviews from Real Users

    Headspin stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its easy setup, scalability, and robust customer support. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    Abhishek M., Associate Vice President at Onnivation, notes, “A lot of companies that are using other solutions do not get access to the kind of metrics that HeadSpin captures…HeadSpin is highly advanced. It has got all the performance structures to provide visibility into how my app is performing in the real world. It also helps to identify the gaps.”

    Shiba S., Automation Engineer at GlobalLogic India, writes, “The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to…They support multiple devices. Plus, they support distribution testing.”

    Sample Customers
    NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow
    Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, Telstra
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Insurance Company7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Device Farm vs. HeadSpin
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. HeadSpin and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Device Farm is ranked 5th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 2 reviews while HeadSpin is ranked 7th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 6 reviews. AWS Device Farm is rated 6.6, while HeadSpin is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Device Farm writes " A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HeadSpin writes "It fulfills everything from automation to manual performance". AWS Device Farm is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, Kobiton Mobile Device Testing, OpenText UFT Digital Lab and Digital.ai Continuous Testing, whereas HeadSpin is most compared with Perfecto, Sauce Labs, BrowserStack, Tricentis Tosca and Selenium HQ. See our AWS Device Farm vs. HeadSpin report.

    See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.