AWS Backup vs Carbonite Server comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #44. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.1% mindshare in CB, compared to OpenText’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Backup

Read 29 AWS Backup reviews

6,225 Views
5,416 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

3,973 Views
2,384 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Backup

Carbonite Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Carbonite Server and AWS Backup are competing products in the data backup solutions category. AWS Backup appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive integration capabilities and feature set.

Features: Carbonite Server offers automatic secure cloud backup, hybrid cloud capabilities, and dependable data recovery options. For AWS Backup, the key features include centralized backup management, extensive integration with multiple AWS services, and robust compliance controls that enhance operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Carbonite Server could enhance its feature set to match more complex integration needs, offer more scalable backup options, and improve documentation accessibility. AWS Backup could improve by streamlining some of its deployment processes, offering more flexible pricing models, and expanding customer service options to cover more in-depth personalized support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server provides a straightforward deployment process and emphasizes strong customer support. AWS Backup offers extensive documentation within the AWS ecosystem, which serves as a solid foundation, though some users might find the initial integration more complex due to its comprehensive capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Carbonite Server is favored for its competitive pricing and straightforward pricing model, making it cost-effective for smaller setups. AWS Backup, while generally more expensive, offers extensive capabilities that deliver solid ROI for larger enterprises with more complex needs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Backup vs. Carbonite Server Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Backup vs. Carbonite Server

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Backup

Ranking in Cloud Backup

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (5th)

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Cloud Backup

44th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (57th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of AWS Backup is 2.1%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Carbonite Server is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Backup	2.1%
Carbonite Server	1.3%
Other	96.6%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Chukwudi Uzoma

Head Of IT, Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated backups have strengthened governance and compliance while simplifying recovery

AWS Backup offers several valuable features. I think the fact that it is an AWS organization-wide service is significant. It is a centralized management system that allows me to manage AWS Backup policies, retention periods, and monitoring from a single place instead of configuring these backups for each AWS service. This helps with governance and control. Another feature I appreciate is the integration with AWS Organization, which allows backup policies to be applied consistently across multiple accounts, which is very important for large organization environments where governance and compliance are critical. I also appreciate the automated backup plans that reduce operational overhead and ensure resources are protected without relying on manual intervention. Additionally, cross-account and cross-region backup support improves resilience against accidental deletion, ransomware, or regional outages. The compliance and reporting features help provide visibility into backup status, recovery points, and policy adherence, making audits much easier.

Read full review

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is amazing, it is the best."

"AWS is the primary platform that we use for our internal needs and we are trying to best use whatever comes with it."

"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."

"It is highly scalable for both SMEs and large enterprises."

"AWS Backup is secure and comes with a vault that ensures data is never deleted, offering great security."

"The snapshots we take through AWS Backup are very effective."

"The auto-scaling feature and the time efficiency of setting up AWS Backup are the most valuable aspects for us."

"We can directly back up EC2 instances in AWS without using any third-party applications."

More AWS Backup pros

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"The solution is very stable."

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

More Carbonite Server pros

Cons

"The initial setup of the solution is complex."

"There are some limitations to partial backup in AWS Backup."

"They should work on their visual capabilities."

"The time it takes to complete the backups could be reduced."

"This backup tool does the full backup of the entire snapshot server. I would like to have the option to not do the full server backup."

"It could be less expensive."

"The AWS Backup backend reporting is a major area that needs improvement. We would be very excited if we can see some reporting, such as trends. We do understand that there are reports available for S3 Bucket, in which the AWS backend stores the data. However, if we can receive holistic reporting, then it would be very helpful for us."

"Only the price could be improved."

More AWS Backup cons

"The stability has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

More Carbonite Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is much cheaper than some vendors but more expensive than others."

"It's a myth that Cloud is cheap. Cloud is cheap initially, but the cost over time can be equal to your own infrastructure if you consume a lot."

"The pricing is decent."

"There are no licensing costs for AWS Backup. You pay only for the amount of backup storage you use and then the data transferred between regions. Overall AWS Backup is priced reasonably."

"The clients pay for the whole AWS bundle. It is an affordable solution."

"The pricing is okay."

"Our customers pay a monthly AWS fee that includes the AWS Backup service."

"AWS is more expensive than some competitors like Azure."

More AWS Backup pricing and cost advice

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The solution is open source."

"Its price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Backup?

Pricing for AWS Backup is based on storage and backup frequency. Although it is reasonable, it requires monitoring, especially with long retention periods.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Backup?

AWS Backup is a great service, but I think there could be improvements on the reporting and dashboard side. More visibility into backup-related costs would be beneficial because I am very FinOps-mi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Backup?

I utilize AWS Backup to automate and centralize backup operations across AWS services in my AWS organization. It helps me ensure compliance with retention requirements, reduce operational overheads...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Commvault Cloud vs AWS Backup

Compared 10% of the time

N2W vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs AWS Backup

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Backup Competitors

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Backup

August 2026

Download AWS Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

August 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Carbonite Recover Backup

Overview

AWS Backup provides centralized management of backups with automated scheduling and cross-region support. It ensures easy restoration and policy-based automation for error reduction while integrating seamlessly with AWS services for efficient data management.

AWS Backup is a cloud-native solution offering a unified platform for managing backups across different AWS services. It supports lifecycle policies, point-in-time recovery, and security vaults. The service is cost-effective with a pay-as-you-go model and is designed for scalability and flexibility. Users benefit from features like snapshots, tagging, and custom plans, which enhance data management strategies. The system supports monitoring, reporting, and compliance to streamline operations, with the ability to manage multiple resources efficiently.

What are the key features of AWS Backup?

Centralized Management: Streamlines backup operations across AWS services.
Automated Scheduling: Efficiently manages backup tasks without manual intervention.
Cross-Region and Cross-Account Support: Enhances data protection and accessibility across regions.
Lifecycle Policies: Enables policy-driven automation to reduce errors.
Point-in-Time Recovery: Facilitates quick data restoration to specific timeframes.
Integration with AWS Services: Provides seamless interaction with other AWS tools.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Pay-as-you-go model reduces upfront and operational costs.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without additional infrastructure.
Data Protection: Advanced features ensure high security and compliance.
Operational Streamlining: Automated tasks and reporting improve efficiency.

AWS Backup is implemented across industries to protect EBS volumes, RDS databases, and more, focusing on data protection and compliance. Organizations utilize it in managing retention policies, disaster recovery, and encryption in hybrid environments, benefiting from tiered storage and efficient backup management.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

Sample Customers

TransferWise

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Buyer's Guide

AWS Backup vs. Carbonite Server

August 2026

Free Report: AWS Backup vs. Carbonite Server

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Backup vs. Carbonite Server and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Backup vs. Carbonite Server report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.