AWS Auto Scaling vs CA App Synthetic Monitor comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.8, while Broadcom is ranked #68. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

AWS Auto Scaling

Read 22 AWS Auto Scaling reviews

1,113 Views
1,046 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

778 Views
762 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

AWS Auto Scaling

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

CA App Synthetic Monitor and AWS Auto Scaling offer distinct benefits for tech buyers in the performance monitoring and auto-scaling category. AWS Auto Scaling generally has the upper hand due to its advanced features and overall value.

Features: CA App Synthetic Monitor provides accurate uptime monitoring, performance analytics, and detailed insights. AWS Auto Scaling offers automated scaling, seamless integration with AWS services, and resource management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CA App Synthetic Monitor could enhance integration with other tools, improve its alerting system, and focus on better tool compatibility. AWS Auto Scaling needs better documentation, a simplified user setup process, and more intuitive onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA App Synthetic Monitor is easy to deploy with responsive customer service. AWS Auto Scaling can be complex to set up but provides reliable AWS support.

Pricing and ROI: CA App Synthetic Monitor is cost-effective with a strong ROI for performance insights. AWS Auto Scaling, though potentially costlier, offers significant returns due to its scalability and integration with AWS services.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

68th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Auto Scaling	0.4%
CA App Synthetic Monitor	0.5%
Other	99.1%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe

DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech

Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency

I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.

Read full review

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."

"The automation aspect where you can automate it to whatever you want is what I value the most about Auto Scaling."

"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."

"It is a stable platform."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."

"The setup is not very complex."

"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."

"Once we moved them to AWS and created the appropriate architecture, it solved the problem."

More AWS Auto Scaling pros

"Each had strengths in one area or another, but CA covered the majority of our needs end-to-end."

"From our experience, it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data."

Cons

"There hasn't been a need for improvements."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"The tool's stability could be improved."

"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."

"The tool must include AI features."

"The solution must improve automation."

"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."

"It could be cheaper."

More AWS Auto Scaling cons

"Pricing makes little sense. We had examples where it would be cheaper to have two basic accounts than one intermediate."

"The RBMS component is limited as you can only record using Internet Explorer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."

"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."

"The product has moderate pricing."

"The product is expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?

The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?

I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 22% of the time

Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 18% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 18% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 10% of the time

More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 19% of the time

IDERA Precise vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Stackify vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download AWS Auto Scaling product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling

CA ASM

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IT organizations require full visibility into business-critical applications regardless of where they're hosted in order to maintain service levels and proactively deal with issues before the end-user is impacted. CA App Synthetic Monitor uses synthetic transactions to provide performance insight for these applications no matter where they're hosted: outside the firewall, in the cloud or delivered via a managed service provider (MSP). Delivered as software as a service, CA App Synthetic Monitor provides end-to-end transaction response time visibility into cloud, mobile and traditional web applications using synthetic transactions delivered by a network of 95 monitoring stations across six continents, 48 countries, 93 cities and 15 time zones.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Lexmark

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor

March 2026

Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.