Avanan vs Kiteworks comparison

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

5,504 Views
1,211 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Avanan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Kiteworks and Avanan are competing products in secure communication and email security. Avanan often leads due to its advanced security features and value for cost.

Features: Kiteworks offers secure file sharing, email protection, and compliance integrations. Its strengths lie in large file transfers up to 30 GB, centralized content management, and built-in antivirus protection. Avanan specializes in advanced AI-driven threat detection, easy integration with platforms like Microsoft Office 365, and comprehensive email threat protection involving sandboxing and anomaly detection.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance its content visibility tools, expand admin access controls, and improve two-factor authentication mechanisms. Avanan may benefit from refining its malware detection algorithms for old-school attack vectors, reducing false positives, and integrating more seamless updates to improve threat identification.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks provides an intuitive deployment process and strong customer support for seamless system integration. Avanan offers a cloud-based setup that prioritizes minimal disruption and rapid deployment, with responsive customer service ensuring ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks provides a cost-effective solution with competitive pricing and a clear ROI through its extensive feature set. Avanan, despite higher initial costs, offers significant ROI by enhancing email security with advanced protective measures that justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Avanan vs. Kiteworks Report (Updated: August 2026).

Avanan vs. Kiteworks

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avanan

Ranking in Email Security

22nd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (40th)

Kiteworks

Ranking in Email Security

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (17th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (8th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Avanan is 1.9%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiteworks is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Avanan	1.9%
Kiteworks	0.8%
Other	97.3%

Email Security

Featured Reviews

Robert Melendez

Vice President Information Technology at Makeready

Enhances email security and has a very simple and easy-to-use UI

Spam protection is the most valuable feature. We have implemented the tool to enhance our email security. It helps prevent phishing attacks. The anomaly detection capabilities are baked into the security platform. The product integrates wonderfully with Microsoft 365. It's built right on a cloud platform and works almost natively. The solution has a very simple and easy-to-use UI. The tool appears extremely powerful and has a good solid feature set. It catches things that are bad for my environment. The user interface is good the way it is. If the solution continues down that path, I see no problems with the way it is going. It feels like a mature product.

Read full review

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, compared to features, the cost is very reasonable and output of this tool is very good."

"The threat detection tools enable us to ascertain malware and phishing messages across the email network infrastructure."

"The customizable rules allow you to change aspects."

"Email inspection has saved many employees from spam attacks and viruses from unauthorized sources."

"Avanan is a stable software. My company hasn't faced any issues, bugs, or problems with the performance of Avanan."

"Easy to use for non-technical users."

"If we look at four to five years ago, we had close to six or eight people click a link in an email per month. Now, we are probably down to about five or six clicks a year, if not less."

"When we don't understand some functionalities, the customer support staff responds fast to our calls and provides immediate action."

More Avanan pros

"The most valuable aspect of Kiteworks is undoubtedly the private content network. This feature is particularly beneficial for us. Furthermore, it serves as a centralized platform that enables us to track and manage our information exchange."

"The solution can be used remotely, including from mobiles, and it's easy to upload and share files."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"It’s a great product that you should seriously consider and take the first step by training."

"As a file-sharing application, it's an absolute 10 out of 10."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"I like Kiteworks or Accellion because it's continuously upgraded. I also know that it probably works with a lot of clients."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

More Kiteworks pros

Cons

"The system response in a slow computing device affects performance when sending and receiving emails."

"The customer service team could come up with clear tutorials on how to use this platform to help new teams."

"The user experience must be improved."

"The cost is higher for SMEs, however, the pricing and billing criteria can be lessened to accommodate more willing customers."

"The system could be designed to give corporate emails first priority due to demands."

"They should come up with a mobile application so that it can be more flexible."

"Being cloud first and because we are in the movie business, we use a lot of Macintoshes. So, there is absolutely no reason for us to have Active Directory whatsoever. However, if you are using Office 365, you must have Active Directory in order to reset passwords. Even though we have a single sign-on provider, we must have Azure Active Directory for Office 365, which is really stupid. As a cloud application, you would think that I don't need Active Directory, which I don't need for anything else except Office 365. We have one server inside that space to help us manage Active Directory just for Office 365. This is a very sore point, but it is what it is."

"When sending bulky emails, the system slows down and takes a long time before it responds effectively to our requests."

More Avanan cons

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

"The system is extremely stable, but because it is a "COTS" system access is restricted and you must use the solution's support to make even simple changes, which increases the downtime."

"I would like to see immediate releases of fixes because now it takes at least a week. If that time span can be reduced to one day or two days, that would be very helpful for users so that things are sorted and transactions work smoothly."

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"We mainly had stability issues with kiteworks, where we were pushing the limits of its capability."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

More Kiteworks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not the cheapest in the market."

"Avanan’s price is comparable to Barracuda."

"The pricing of Avanan is reasonable."

"Good pricing arrangement as an SaaS offering."

"Having the flexibility and modeling to do the pricing that best fits the needs of the organization is incredibly ideal. That is what Avanan does. They know exactly how many users are using it, etc. We can tune the invoicing associated with how we are using the product so we can charge it back to the shows appropriately."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs Avanan

Compared 11% of the time

Guardz vs Avanan

Compared 8% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs Avanan

Compared 8% of the time

INKY Email Security Platform vs Avanan

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Avanan

Compared 6% of the time

More Avanan Competitors

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

Seclore Email Encryption vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Product Reports

Avanan

Download Avanan product report

Download Kiteworks product report

Also Known As

No data available

Accellion

Overview

Avanan offers advanced threat detection for protecting against phishing and malware, utilizing strong AI algorithms and seamless integration with platforms like Office 365. Its cloud-based, customizable security rules ensure efficient data protection suitable for diverse organizational sizes.

Avanan's platform is designed for email security across cloud and on-premises environments, protecting against threats like ransomware and DDoS attacks. With features such as real-time threat detection and advanced filtering, it integrates effortlessly with Microsoft 365. Organizations appreciate its user-friendly interface that allows for easy deployment and management. While possessing cost-effective qualities, Avanan might improve in SaaS integration, AI logic, and technical support with Check Point. Some users suggest enhancements like better mobile compatibility and faster threat response. The system's documentation and querying functionalities could also see refinement, addressing concerns for SMEs.

What are Avanan's key features?

Advanced Threat Detection: Quickly identifies phishing and malware.
Anti-Malware: Supports Office 365 and Box.com with strong AI algorithms.
Sandboxing Capability: Quarantines suspicious emails efficiently.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with tools like Office 365 and Slack.
Customizable Security: Offers cloud-based, always-on protection.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-Effectiveness: Ideal for organizations of all sizes.
Ease of Implementation: Quick and easy setup process.
User-Friendly Management: Simplifies threat management and data protection.
Enhanced Data Protection: Comprehensive security across environments.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Avanan is implemented widely to protect sensitive communications and ensure compliance with data protection regulations. Its flexibility makes it suitable for sectors requiring robust security measures, leveraging cloud-based solutions for real-time threat mitigation and data leak prevention.

Avanan, a Check Point Company

Kiteworks provides secure enterprise file sharing with mobile access and collaboration tools, supporting up to 100 GB transfers. It ensures data safety with encryption and offers a smooth interface for independent data management.

Kiteworks is tailored for effective large-scale data transfers using SFTP, email, and web. It supports two-factor authentication, antivirus scanning, and seamless integration with SSO to minimize administrative tasks. Users benefit from a centralized platform that offers visibility and control over data exchanges, receiving activity notifications and managing encryption keys independently. Despite its strengths, technical support and interface stability need improvement, along with the introduction of automated LDAP syncing and expanded knowledge resources.

What features make Kiteworks stand out?

Mobile Access: Facilitates secure data handling on-the-go.
Enterprise File Sharing: Enables large file transfers with up to 100 GB limit.
Collaboration Tools: Streamlines team efforts and file sharing.
Enhanced Security: Includes two-factor authentication and antivirus scanning.
SSO Integration: Reduces administrative tasks for efficient user management.

What ROI benefits should users seek in reviews?

Data Security: High level of encryption ensures sensitive data protection.
Efficient Management: Independent data handling and activity alerts improve workflow.
Administrative Ease: SSO and centralized logs simplify oversight and reduce complexity.

Organizations in sectors like healthcare and finance utilize Kiteworks to securely share and transfer sensitive data, from medical records to credit card information, ensuring compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its automated data transfer and secure communication capabilities, critical for operations ranging from air quality monitoring to banking transactions.

Sample Customers

Bethel School District, ServiceSource, Capital Caring

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Avanan vs. Kiteworks